Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T11:52:52.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Susceptibility of Four Forest Insects to a Commercial Preparation of Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

O. N. Morris
O. N. Morris
Affiliation:
Forest Entomology and Pathology Laboratory, Department of Forestry of Canada, Victoria, British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) and other entomogenous spore-formers have received increased interest in view of their great potential for insect control. These insect pathogens are generally known as “microbial insecticides” and are so-called because of a spore-associated protein crystalline inclusion which have been shown to be toxic for some insects (Angus 1956). Krieg (1961) lists some one hundred insects, mainly Lepidoptera, which are susceptible to Bacillus thuringiensis and closely related bacteria.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 94 , Issue 7 , July 1962 , pp. 686 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angus, T. A. 1956. Association of toxicity with protein-crystalline inclusions of Bacillus sotto Ishiwata. Can. J. Microbiol. 2: 122–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. 1961. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Hall, I. M., and Arakawa, K. Y. (1959). The susceptibility of the house fly, Musca domestica Linnaeus, to Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Ins. Path. 1: 351–355.Google Scholar
Hall, I. M., Hale, R. L., Shorey, H. H., and Arakawa, K. Y. (1960). Evaluation of chemical and microbial materials for control of the cabbage looper. J. Econ. Ent. 54: 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, I. M., and Dunn, Paul H.. 1958. Susceptibility of some insect pests to infection by Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner in laboratory tests. J. Econ. Ent. 51: 296–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimpel, A. M., and Angus, T. A.. 1960. Bacterial insecticides. Bacteriol. Rev. 24(3): 266–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinghorn, J. M., Fisher, R. A., Angus, T. A., and Heimpel, A. M.. Aerial spray trials against the black-headed budworm in British Columbia. Can. Dept. Forestry Bi-monthly Prog. Rept. 17: (3).Google Scholar
Krieg, A. 1961. Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner. Mitt. biol. Bundesanstalt Land. Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem. Heft 103, 79 pp.Google Scholar
McEwen, F. L., Glass, E. H., Davis, A. C., and Splittstoesser, C. M.. 1960. Field tests with Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner for control of four lepidopterous pests. J. Ins. Path. 2: 152–164.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N.Susceptibility of the black–headed budworm to Thuricide. Can. Dept. Forestry Bi-monthly Prog. Rept. 17: (3)Google Scholar
Silver, G. T., and Ross, D. A.. 1960. In Ann. Rept. Forest Insect and Disease Survey. Can Dept. Forestry. 93–105.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. E. 1957. Estimation of humidity with cobalt thiocyanate papers and permanent colour standards. Bull. Ent. Res. 48: 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar