Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T03:48:27.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE ANALOGUE OF THE PRIMARY SEX-PHEROMONE COMPONENTS OF SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. J. Silk
Affiliation:
Pheromone Research Group, Research and Productivity Council, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5H1
L. P. S. Kuenen
Affiliation:
Pheromone Research Group, Research and Productivity Council, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5H1
G. C. Lonergan
Affiliation:
Pheromone Research Group, Research and Productivity Council, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5H1

Extract

Disruption of mating and of trap capture of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), has been accomplished in recent years (reviewed in Silk and Kuenen 1984) by disseminating large quantities of the primary components (synthetic) of the female sex pheromone within a forest environment. These components (E)- and (2)-11-tetradecenal (E/Z11-14:Ald) (Sanders and Weatherston 1976) are emitted by virgin female budworm at a 95/5 E/Z ratio (Silk et al. 1980). Unsaturated aldehydes are expensive, tend to polymerize readily (Dunkelblum et al. 1984), and are susceptible to air oxidation and/or photodegradation in the field environment. Analogues, with increased stability and reduced cost, that duplicate the effects of these pheromone components would therefore be of practical value.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beevor, D. S., Hall, D. R., Nesbitt, B. F., Dyck, V. A., Arida, G., Lippold, P. C., and Oloumi-Sadeghi, H.. 1977. Field trials of synthetic sex pheromones of the striped rice borer Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), and of related compounds. Bull. ent. Res. 67: 439.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. A. and McLaughlin, J. R.. 1982 a. Diolefin analog of a sex pheromone component of Heliothis zea active in disrupting mating communication. Experientia 38: 309310.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. A. and McLaughlin, J. R.. 1982 b. Disruption of mating communication in Heliothis zea: Synthesis and tests of olefinic analogues of a sex pheromone component. Prot. Ecol. 4: 361369.Google Scholar
Dunkelblum, E., Kehat, M., Klug, J. T., and Shani, A.. 1984. Trimerization of Earias insulana sex pheromone (E,E)-10, 12-hexadecadienal. A phenomenon affecting trapping efficiency. J. Chem. Ecol. 10: 421428.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, T. D., St. Clair, A. D., Daterman, G. E., and Smith, R. G.. 1973. Slow release plastic formulation of the cabbage looper pheromone cis-7-dodecenyl acetate. Release rate and biological activity. Environ. Ent. 2: 607610.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. R., Jacobson, M., and Baumhover, A. H.. 1975. Heliothis spp. Disruption of pheromonal communication by (Z)-9-tetradecen-1-ol formate. Environ. Ent. 4: 577579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1981. Release rates and attraction of PVC lures containing synthetic sex attractant of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 113: 103111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Seabrook, W. D.. 1982. Disruption of mating in the spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens). In Kydonieus, A. F. and Beroza, M., Insect Suppression with Controlled Release Pheromone Systems, Vol. II. CRC Press. 312 pp.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Weatherston, J.. 1976. Sex pheromone of the eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Optimum blend of trans- and cis-11-tetradecenal. Can. Ent. 108: 12851290.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J., Weatherston, J., and Grant, G. G.. 1980. Effects of (E)-9-dodecen-1-yl formate on the sex pheromone response of male spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 112: 99102.Google Scholar
Shorey, H. H., Kaae, R. S., and Gaston, L. K.. 1974. Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera. Development of a method for pheromonal control of Pectinophora gossypïella in cotton. J. econ. Ent. 67: 347350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silk, P. J. and Kuenen, L. P. S.. 1984. Sex pheromones and their potential as control agents for forest Lepidoptera in eastern Canada. In Garner, W. Y. and Harvey, J. Jr., (Eds.), Chemical and Biological Controls in Forestry. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. Monogr. 238. 406 pp.Google Scholar
Silk, P. J., Tan, S. H., Wiesner, C. J., Ross, R. J., and Lonergan, G. C.. 1980. Sex pheromone chemistry of the eastern spruce budworm. Environ. Ent. 9: 640644.Google Scholar