Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:43:36.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Area of Discovery of Two Insect Parasites, Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) and Trichogramma evanescens Westwood, in an Artificial Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Roy L. Edwards
Affiliation:
Entomology Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario

Extract

Two of the most important factors that contribute to the success of a parasite population are (1) the ability to find hosts and (2) the ability to oviposit in hosts when found. The theories of Thompson (1922, 1924), Nicholson (1933) and Nicholson and Bailey (1935), which have commanded attention in the field of population dynamics for a number of years, emphasized the importance of these factors in quite different ways.

Thompson assumed that the parasites have no difficulty in finding their hosts but have a constant egg supply whereas Nicholson assumed that the egg supply is virtually unlimited but that the parasites have a fixed and limited searching ability which he called their ‘area of discovery’.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Bach, P., and Smith, H. S. 1941a. Are population oscillations inherent in the host-parasite relation? Ecology 22: 363369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bach, P., and Smith, H. S. 1941b. The effect of host density on the rate of reproduction of entomophagous parasites. J. Econ. Ent. 34: 741745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bach, P., and Smith, H. S. 1947. Effects of parasite population density on rate of change of host and parasite populations. Ecology 28: 290298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Roy L. 1954a. The host finding and oviposition behaviour of Mormoniella vitripennis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) a parasite of Muscoid flies. Behaviour 7: 88112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Roy L. 1954b. The effect of diet on egg maturation and resorption in Mormoniella vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 95: 459468.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1935. Effect of host density on parasitism. J. Econ. Ent. 288: 898900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J. 1937. Host finding by insect parasites. 1. Observations on the finding of hosts by Alysia manducator, Mormoniella vitripennis and Trichogramma evanescens. J. Anim. Ecol. 6: 298317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J. 1938. Host finding by insect parasites. 2. The chance of Trichogramma evanescens finding its hosts. J. Exp. Biol. 15: 281302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, H. O. 1938. Studies on longevity and productivity in Trichogramma evanescens. J. Agric. Res. 56: 421439.Google Scholar
Milne, A. 1957. The natural control of insect populations. Canadian Ent. 89: 193213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. 1933. The balance of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 2: 132178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. 1955. An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Australian J. Zool. 2: 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J., and Bailey, V. A. 1935. The balance of animal populations, Part 1. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. (1935): 551598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G. 1937. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. 5. The sense used by Trichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 122: 5775.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1922. Etude de quelque cas simples de parasitisme cyclique chez les insectes entomophages. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 174: 16471649.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1924. La théorie mathématique de l'action des parasites entomophagiques et le facteur du hasard. Ann. Fac. Sci. Marseille 2: 6989.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C., and Edwards, Roy L. 1957. The bearing of parasite behaviour on the dynamics of insect host and parasite populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 26: 471477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar