Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T02:37:35.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AN ANALYSIS OF GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION IN THE DAMSELFLY, ARGIA APICALIS (ZYGOPTERA: COENAGRIONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Clifford Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville

Abstract

The paper describes and maps stripe pattern variability in the damselfly Argia apicalis (Say) along the periphery of its southeastern distribution. Two major variations exist. One, the broad-striped form, has a wide, full-length humeral stripe and, in females, a well-developed middorsal thoracic stripe. Broad-striped specimens also possess larger areas of black pattern on the dorsum of the head and, in males, on the eighth and ninth abdominal segments. The second, typical form, has a reduced pattern characterizing populations west and north of southeast Georgia and northern Florida. The southeastern margin of distribution consists of broad-striped populations representing four groups of isolated populations. Isolation results from low interchange between colonies of different river systems and, within the southeast, lack of colonies on lakes, ponds, smaller streams, and river headwaters. One intergradation area between typical and broad-striped populations is known. A discussion follows relating origin of the variability to Pleistocene habitat changes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bick, G. H. and Bick, J. C.. 1965 a. Demography and behavior of the damselfly, Argia apicalis (Say), (Odonata: Coenagriidae). Ecology 46: 461472.Google Scholar
Bick, G. H. and Bick, J. C.. 1965 b. Color variation and significance of color in reproduction in the damselfly, Argia apicalis (Say) (Zygoptera: Coenagriidae). Can. Ent. 97: 3241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, C. F. 1930. A contribution to the knowledge of Florida Odonata. Univ. Fla. Publ. Biol. Sci. Ser. 1: 9327.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1945. Geology of Florida. Fla St. Geol. Surv., Geol. Bull. 29, pp. i-ix, 1339, 47 figs., 1 map.Google Scholar
Garman, P. 1917. The Zygoptera, or damsel-flies of Illinois. Bull. Ill. St. Lab. nat. Hist. 12: 411587.Google Scholar
Gloyd, L. K. 1968. The union of Argia fumipennis (Burmeister, 1839) with Argia violacea (Hagen, 1861) and the recognition of three subspecies (Odonata). Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich., No. 658, pp. 16.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. 1972. The demselflies (Zygoptera) of Texas. Bull. Fla St. Mus. 16: 55128.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. and Westfall, M. J. Jr. 1970. Diagnostic keys and notes on the damselflies (Zygoptera) of Florida. Bull. Fla St. Mus. 15: 4589.Google Scholar
MacNeill, F. S. 1951. Pleistocene shore lines in Florida and Georgia. U.S. geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 221-F, pp. 95107.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1965. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Neil, W. T. 1957. Historical biogeography of present-day Florida. Bull. Fla St. Mus. 2: 175220.Google Scholar
Walker, E. M. 1953. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Vol. 1. Univ. Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar