Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:32:58.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AMBROSIA BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: PLATYPODIDAE) OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R.A. Beaver*
Affiliation:
16112 Mu 5, Soi Wat Pranon, T. Donkaew, A. Maerim, Chiangmai 50180, Thailand

Abstract

Platypus bordenisp.nov. and Platypus namosianussp.nov. are described from the island of Viti Levu, Fiji, breeding in Syzygium ?curvistylum (Gillespie) Merr. and Perry (Myrtaceae). A key is provided to nine species of Platypodidae from the South Pacific islands. A review of the economic importance of Platypodidae in the region and possible management strategies is provided.

Résumé

On trouvera ici la description de Platypus bordenisp.nov. et Platypus namosianussp.nov. provenants de l’île de Viti Levu, Fiji. Les deux espèces se reproduisent dans Syzygium ?curvistylum (Gillespie) Merr. and Perry (Myrtaceae). On trouvera également une clef permettant de distinguer les neuf espèces de Platypodidae des îles du Pacifique Sud, de même qu’une synthèse sur l’importance économique des Platypodidae dans cette région et sur les stratégies de lutte intégrée disponsibles contre les ravageurs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaver, R.A. 1976. The biology of Samoan bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 65: 531–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, R.A. 1977. Bark and ambrosia beetles in tropical forests. BIOTROP Special Publication 2: 133–47Google Scholar
Beaver, R.A. 1989. Insect–fungus relationships in the bark and ambrosia beetles. pp. 121–43 in Wilding, N., Collins, N.M., Hammond, P., Webber, J.F. (Eds), Insect-fungus interactions. London: Academic PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, R.A. 1995. Additions and corrections to the bark and ambrosia beetle fauna of Fiji (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). South Pacific Journal of Natural Science 14: 1126Google Scholar
Borden, J.H. 1990. Use of semiochemicals to manage coniferous tree pests in Western Canada. pp. 281315in Ridgway, R.L., Silverstein, R.M., Inscoe, M.N. (Eds), Behavior-modifying chemicals for insect management. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Borden, J.H. 1993. Strategies and tactics for the use of semiochemicals against forest insect pests in North America. pp. 265–79 in Lumsden, R.D., Vaughn, J.L. (Eds), Pest management: biologically based technologies. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical SocietyGoogle Scholar
Browne, F.G. 1961. The biology of Malayan Scolytidae and Platypodidae. Malayan Forest Records 22: 1255Google Scholar
Browne, F.G. 1965. Types of ambrosia beetle attack on living trees in tropical forests. p. 680in Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Entomology, LondonGoogle Scholar
Browne, F.G. 1968. Pests and diseases of forest plantation trees. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Crowson, R.A. 1968. The natural classification of the families of Coleoptera. Hampton: E.W. ClasseyGoogle Scholar
Elliott, H.J.., Madden, J.L., Bashford, R. 1983. The association of ethanol in the attack behaviour of the mountain pinhole borer, Platypus subgranosus Schedl (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Platypodinae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 22: 299302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulds, W. 1977. A pathogenic fungus associated with Platypus attack on New Zealand Nothofagus species. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science 7: 384–96Google Scholar
Gray, B. 1972. Economic tropical forest entomology. Annual Review of Entomology 17: 313–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B. 1974. Forest insect problems in the South Pacific. Commonwealth Forestry Review 53: 3948Google Scholar
Kirkendall, L.R., Kent, D.S., Raffa, K.F. 1997. Interactions among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: the significance of living in tunnels for the evolution of social behavior. pp. 181215in Choe, J.C., Crespi, BJ. (Eds), Social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuschel, W. 1995. A phylogenetic classification of Curculionoidea to families and subfamilies. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Washington, 14: 533Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.F., Newton, A.F. 1995. Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names). pp. 7791006in Pakaluk, J., Slipinski, S.A. (Eds), Biology, phylogeny and classification of Coleoptera. Papers celebrating the 80th birthday of Roy A. Crowson. Warsaw: Museum I Instytut Zoologii PANGoogle Scholar
Madrid, F., Vité, J.P., Renwick, J.A.A. 1972. Evidence of aggregation pheromone in the ambrosia beetle, Platypus flavicornis (F.). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 72: 73–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, R.H., Ytsma, G. 1988. Pheromone dissemination by male Platypus apicalis White and P. gracilis Broun (Col., Platypodidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 106: 113–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, R.H., Osbome, G.O., Ytsma, G. 1988. Evidence for an aggregation pheromone in Platypus gracilis Broun (Col., Platypodidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 106: 20–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakashima, T. 1975. Several types of the mycetangia found in platypodid ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Platypodidae). Insecta Matsumurana (N.S.) 7: 169Google Scholar
Norris, D.M. 1976. Chemical interdependencies among Xyleborus spp. ambrosia beetles and their symbiotic microbes. Beihefte zu Material und Organismen 3: 479–88Google Scholar
Renwick, J.A.A., Vité, J.P., Billings, R.F. 1977. Aggregation pheromones in the ambrosia beetle Platypus flavicornis. Naturwissenschaften 64: 226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, H. 1960. Trachyostus ghanaensis Schedl (Col., Platypodidae), an ambrosia beetle attacking wawa, Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum. Technical Bulletin of the West African Timber Borer Research Unit 3: 117Google Scholar
Roberts, H. 1977 a. The Platypodidae (Coleoptera) of Fiji (with descriptions of two new species). Journal of Natural History 11: 555–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. 1977 b. When ambrosia beetles attack mahogany trees in Fiji. Unasylva 29(117): 25–8Google Scholar
Roberts, H. 1987. Forest insect pests of Papua New Guinea. 2. Pin-hole borers (shot hole borers) attacks on logs, lumber and living trees. Harvest 12: 91–6Google Scholar
Schedl, K.E. 1972. Monographie der Platypodidae Coleoptera. The Hague: Dr W. Junk by PublishersGoogle Scholar
Speight, M.R. 1997. Forest pests in the tropics: current status and future threats. pp. 207–27 in Watt, A.D., Stork, N.E., Hunter, M.D. (Eds), Forests and insects. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.T. 1992. Observations on the morphology and classification of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) with a key to major groups. Journal of Natural History 26: 835–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S.L. 1973. On the taxonomic status of Platypodidae and Scolytidae. Great Basin Naturalist 33: 7790Google Scholar
Wood, S.L. 1993. Revision of the genera of Platypodidae (Coleoptera). Great Basin Naturalist 53: 259–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S.L., Bright, D.E. 1987. A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), part 1: bibliography. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 11: 1685Google Scholar
Wood, S.L., Bright, D.E. 1992. A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), part 2: taxonomic index. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 13: 11553Google Scholar
Ytsma, G. 1989. Colonization of southern beech by Platypus caviceps (Coleoptera: Platypodidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 1171–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar