Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T15:24:03.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NON-RANDOM RESORPTION OF OOCYTES IN GRASSHOPPERS (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert G. Bellinger  and
Robert L. Pienkowski
Robert G. Bellinger
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA 24061
Robert L. Pienkowski
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Resorption of terminal oocytes was investigated in 3 species of grasshoppers, Melanoplus femurrubrum femurrubrum (DeGeer), M. scudderi (Uhler), and Hippiscus ocelote (Saussure). Significant differences in percentage resorption were found between species. Anterior ovarioles resorbed terminal oocytes more frequently than ovarioles in the middle and posterior regions of the ovaries. Resorption of terminal oocytes due to differences in relative ovariole age does not appear to be a factor in percentage resorption based on the lengths of developing terminal oocytes. There was no difference in percentage resorption of terminal oocytes between ovaries.

Résumé

On a investigué la résorption des oocytes terminaux chez 3 espèces de criquets, Melanoplus femurrubrum femurrubrum (DeGeer), M. scudderi (Uhler), et Hippiscus ocelote (Saussure). On a observé des différences significatives du pourcentage de résorption entre espèces. La résorption des oocytes terminaux était plus fréquente dans les ovarioles antérieures que dans les ovarioles médianes ou postérieures des ovaires. La résorption des oocytes terminaux due à des différences relatives d'âge des ovarioles n'apparait pas affecter le pourcentage de résorption d'après la longueur des oocytes terminaux en développement. On n'a observé aucune différence dans le pourcentage de résorption entre les ovaires.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 117 , Issue 9 , September 1985 , pp. 1067 - 1069
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, W.J., and Bohm, M.V.. 1975. Oosorption in insects. Biol. Rev. 50: 373–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellinger, R.G., and Pienkowski, R.L.. 1985. Interspecific variation in ovariole number in melanopline grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 78: 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blatchely, W.S. 1920. Orthoptera of Northeastern America. Nature Publ. Co., Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Chapman, R.F. 1982. The insects. Harvard Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Helfer, J.R. 1972. The grasshoppers, cockroaches, and their allies, 2nd ed. Wm. C. Brown Co. Publ., Dubuque, IA.Google Scholar
Launois-Luong, M.H. 1978. Méthode pratique d'interprétation de l'état des ovaires des acridiens du Sahel. Ann. Zool. Ecol. Anim. 10: 569–587.Google Scholar
Lusis, O. 1963. The histology and histochemistry of development and resorption in the terminal oocytes of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Quart. J. Microbiol. Sci. 104: 57–68.Google Scholar
Phipps, J. 1959. Studies on East African Acridoidea (Orthoptera), with special reference to egg-production, habitats, and seasonal cycles. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 111: 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, J. 1966. Ovulation and oocyte resorption in Acridoidea. Proc. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 41: 78–86.Google Scholar