Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T02:28:41.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LABORATORY FEEDING AND COLONIZATION OF NON-HOST LODGEPOLE PINE BY TWO POPULATIONS OF PISSODES STROBI (PECK) (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Rene I. Alfaro
Rene I. Alfaro
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, 506 West Burnside Road, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8Z 1M5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two populations of Pissodes strobi (Peck), one from Sitka spruce, Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr, and the other from Engelmann spruce, Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm., were successfully induced to oviposit on the non-host lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta Dougl. var latifolia. The number of egg punctures excavated on the non-host was smaller than that on either Sitka or Engelmann spruce. Survival from egg to adult was similar on the non-host and the host trees. The two weevil populations differed in the degree to which lodgepole pine met the nutritional requirements for weevil development, as measured by weight of weevils and developmental time from egg to adult. In choice-feeding experiments, weevils reared in lodgepole pine rejected this species and chose Sitka spruce, suggesting that feeding preference in P. strobi is genetically fixed and therefore cannot be changed by rearing the insects on the non-host tree. The importance of these findings is discussed in relation to the idea of weevil control through the development of weevil-resistant varieties.

Résumé

On a réussi à induire deux populations de Pissodes strobi Peck, l’une provenant de l’épinette de Sitka (Picea sitchensis [Bong.] Carr) et l’autre de l’épinette d’Engelmann (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), à pondre sur le pin tordu (Pinus contorta Dougl. var latifolia), une espèce non hôte de ce charançon. Toutefois, le nombre d’excavations à oeufs a été plus faible chez le pin que chez les deux épinettes. La survie de l’oeuf au stade adulte a été semblable chez les trois espèces. On a constaté une différence entre les deux populations du charançon en ce qui concerne la satisfaction des besoins nutritifs lors du développement sur le pin, telle que mesurée par la masse des charançons et le temps de développement de l’oeuf à l’adulte. Dans des expériences visant à établir les préférences alimentaires des charançons élevés sur le pin tordu, ceux-ci ont rejeté le pin tordu et choisi l’épinette de Sitka, ce qui nous porte à croire que la préférence alimentaire est un caractère génétiquement fixé chez P. strobi et ne peut donc être changée en élevant celui-ci sur un arbre qui n’est pas son hôte normal. On discute de l’importance de ces résultats par rapport à l’idée de créer des variétés résistantes au charançon pour lutter contre celui-ci.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 2 , February 1988 , pp. 167 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfaro, R.I. 1982. Fifty-year-old Sitka spruce plantations with a history of intense weevil attack. J. ent. Soc. B.C. 79: 62–65.Google Scholar
Alfaro, R.I., and Borden, J.H.. 1982. Host selection by the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi Peck: feeding bioassays using host and non-host plants. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfaro, R.I., and Borden, J.H. 1985. Factors determining the feeding of the white pine weevil on its coastal British Columbia host, Sitka spruce. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 116(Supplement): 63–66.Google Scholar
Alfaro, R.I., Pierce, H.D. Jr., Borden, J.H., and Oehlschlager, A.E.. 1979. A quantitative feeding bioassay for Pissodes strobi Peck (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 5: 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfaro, R.I., Pierce, H.D. Jr., Borden, J.H., and Oehlschlager, A.E. 1980. Role of volatile and nonvolatile components of Sitka spruce bark as feeding stimulants for Pissodes strobi Peck (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Can. J. Zool. 58: 626–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, M. 1976. Studies on the induction of food preference in alfalfa ladybird, Subcoccinella 24-punctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinelllidae). Symp. Biol. Hung. 16: 23–28.Google Scholar
Craighead, F.C. 1921. Hopkins' host selection principle as related to certain cerambicid beetles. J. Agric. Res. 22: 189–220.Google Scholar
Gara, R.I., Carlson, R.L., and Hrutfiord, B.F.. 1971. Influence of some physical and host factors on the behaviour of the Sitka spruce weevil, Pissodes sitchensis, in Southwestern Washington. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K. 1963. Concepts of Forest Entomology. Reinhold Publ. Co., New York. 388 pp.Google Scholar
Graham, S.A., and Satterlund, D.R.. 1956. White pine weevil attacking red pine. J. For. 54: 133–134.Google Scholar
Hanson, F.E. 1976. Comparative studies on induction of food choice preferences in Lepidopterous larvae. Symp. Biol. Hung. 16: 71–77.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A.D. 1917. A discussion of C.F. Hewitt's paper on “Insect behavior.” J. econ. Ent. 10: 92–93.Google Scholar
MacAloney, H.J. 1930. The white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi Peck). Its biology and control. Syracuse Univ., N.Y. State Coll. For. 3. 87 pp.Google Scholar
McMullen, L.H. 1976. Spruce weevil damage. Ecological basis and hazard rating for Vancouver Island. Can. For. Serv. Pac. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. BC-X-141.Google Scholar
McMullen, L.H., and Condrashoff, S.F.. 1973. Notes on dispersal, longevity and overwintering of adult Pissodes strobi (Peck) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Vancouver Island. J. ent. Soc. B.C. 70: 22–26.Google Scholar
Richmond, H.A. 1933. Host selection studies of Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk. in Southern British Columbia. For. Chron. 9: 60–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderSar, T.J.D. 1978. Resistance of western white pine to feeding and oviposition by Pissodes strobi Peck, in western Canada. J. Chem. Ecol. 4: 641–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderSar, T.J.D., and Borden, J.H.. 1977. Visual orientation of Pissodes strobi Peck (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in relation to host selection behaviour. Can. J. Zool. 55: 2042–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderSar, T.J.D., Borden, J.H., and McLean, J.A.. 1977. Host preference of Pissodes strobi Peck (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) reared from three native hosts. J. Chem. Ecol. 3: 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.L. 1963. Studies on host selection by Ips confusus (Le Conte) Coleoptera: Scolytidae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 27: 241–282.Google Scholar