Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jhxnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:06:51.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immature Stages and Biology of Apateticus cynicus (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. A. Jones
Affiliation:
Project Assistant and Associate Professor, respectively, Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 6, Wisconsin
H. C. Coppel
Affiliation:
Project Assistant and Associate Professor, respectively, Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 6, Wisconsin

Abstract

The egg and five nymphal stages of Apateticus cynicus (Say) are described and illustrated. The nymphal stages can be separated on the basis of head-capsule width, no overlap being encountered in the specimens studied. The overall growth rate was uniform. Varying growth rates were recorded for each antennal segment. Segment one remained the shortest throughout, whereas segment four, the longest in the first stage, became shorter than segment three by the fifth stage. The second segment increased in length from 0.25 to 2.78 mm.

Apateticus cynicus has one generation each year and overwinters in the egg stage in Wisconsin. Females deposit 1-3 egg batches with an average of 57.12 eggs per batch. Hatching in the laboratory took 14 days at approximately 22 °C. The average number of days spent in each of the five instars was 5.08, 5.27, 5.33, 5.0, and 9.5 respectively. Adult females lived up to 163 days and males to 180 days in the laboratory. The effectiveness of A. cynicus in the population reduction of Diprion similis (Htg.) larvae is unknown. Though a large insect and a voracious feeder throughout its immature and mature period, it has low egg production, is univoltine, and overwinters in the vulnerable egg stage, usually on the tree.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, A. D. 1927. Keys for the identification of the Canadian species of Pentatomidae (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Rept. Quebec Soc. Protection Plants (1926–1927) 19: 3542.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W. S. 1926. Heteroptera or true bugs of Eastern North America. The Nature Publishing Co., Indianapolis. 1116 p.Google Scholar
Coppel, H. C., and Jones, P. A.. 1963. Bionomics of Podisus spp. associated with the introduced pine sawfly Diprion similis (Htg.) in Wisconsin. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. 51: 3156.Google Scholar
DeCoursey, R. M., and Esselbaugh, C. O.. 1962. Description of the nymphal stages of some North American Pentatomidae (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 55: 323342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esselbaugh, C. O. 1946. A study of the eggs of the Pentatomidae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 39: 667691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essig, E. O. 1942. College Entomology. The MacMillan Co., New York. 900 p.Google Scholar
Kirkland, A. H. 1898. The species of Podisus occurring in the United States. Rept. Mass. State Board Agr. Appendix. 112138.Google Scholar
Parshley, H. M. 1923. Family Pentatomidae, p. 753776. In Britton, W. E.. Guide to the insects of Connecticut. Part IV. The Hemiptera or sucking insects of Connecticut. Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Survey, Hartford.Google Scholar
Prebble, M. L. 1933. The biology of Podisus serieventris Uhler. in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia. Canad. J. Res. 9: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, Thomas. 1831. Descriptions of new species of Heteropterous Hemiptera of North America. New Harmony, Ind. 39 p.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G.. 1959. Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology. Fifth ed. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa. 534 p.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1956. The structure of the eggs of the terrestrial Heteroptera and its relationship to the classification of the group. Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 180: 163221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P. C. 1939. Notes on the predacious stink bug, Apateticus cynicus Say. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 32: 228.Google Scholar
Stoner, Dayton. 1919. The Scutelleroidea of Iowa. Univ. of Iowa Studies Nat. Hist. 8: 1140.Google Scholar
Stoner, Dayton. 1922. The Scutelleroidea of the Douglas Lake region. Univ. of Iowa Studies Nat. Hist. 10: 4565.Google Scholar
Torre-Bueno, J. R. de la. 1950. A glossary of entomology. Brooklyn Entomol. Soc., Brooklyn, N.Y.345 p.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, R. D. 1916. Life-history notes on Apateticus cynicus and maculiventris. J. Econ. Entomol. 9: 5153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar