Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:12:43.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

C. E. P.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Preface
Information
Camden Third Series , Volume 24 , December 1913 , pp. vii - xv
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page xii note 1 The Dublin reprint was probably due to the fact that many of the letters refer to that city.

page xij note 1 Hallam in his Constitutional History, vol. II. p. 170–1 minimizes the effect of Jenks's imprisonment on the passing of the Act; but that Shaftesbury used the incident with telling effect there can be no doubt.

page xiij note 1 See Transactions of the R.Hist.Soc, 3rd Series, Vol. V, “The Intrigue to Deprive the Earl of Essex of the Lord Lieutenancy of Ireland.”