^{page 30 note 1} Cal. of Patent Bolls, 1292–1301, p. 108.Google Scholar

^{page 30 note 2} E. 101/232/11: Cal. of Documents, Ireland, 1293–1301, pp. 52–7.

^{page 32 note 1} Sic: recte Kyll.

^{page 32 note 2} MS. omits “et”.

^{page 35 note 1} MS. “quod”.

^{page 35 note 2} Sic.

^{page 37 note 1} Sic.

^{page 37 note 2} Hole in MS.

^{page 38 note 1} This rubric is incorrect: the petition was evidently presented by the bishop of Kildare.

^{page 40 note 1} MS. omits.

^{page 41 note 1} Sic.

^{page 42 note 1} Sic.

^{page 42 note 2} This appears from William de Vesoy's reply to be the third of three petitions, the first two having escaped enrolment.

^{page 42 note 1} Sic.