^{page 99 note 1} Parl. Writs, II. ii. 350.Google Scholar

^{page 99 note 2} The clearest statement regarding the deputation is given in the Lanercost Chronicle (p. 258) which is in part supported by the contemporary letter from a Canterbury Register printed in Parl. Writs, II. ii. 354Google Scholar. The account given by Geoffrey le Baker (Chronicon, pp. 26–7Google Scholar) is obviously inaccurate, but appears to be correct as to the number of bishops. For other accounts see Clarke, M. V., “The Deposition of Edward II” in Historical Essays in honour of James Tait, pp. 35 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 99 note 3} For this, see below, p. 101.

^{page 99 note 4} Foedera, II. ii. 684Google Scholar; Rot. Parl., II. 3.Google Scholar

^{page 100 note 1} Bull. Inst. Hist. Research, IX. 16.Google Scholar

^{page 100 note 2} Printed by Legg, J. Wickham, Three Coronation Orders (Henry Bradshaw Soc), pp. 121–4.Google Scholar

^{page 101 note 1} Chronicles of Edward I and Edward II (R.S.), I. 324.Google Scholar

^{page 101 note 2} Chronicon (R.S.), I. 441–2Google Scholar: previously printed by Twysden, Decem Scriptores, col. 2550, whence it was reprinted in Foedera, II. 650Google Scholar, and by Stubbs, Constitutional History (4th ed.), II. 380.Google Scholar

^{page 101 note 3} Literae Gantuarienses (Rolls Series), III. 414.Google Scholar

^{page 101 note 4} From Harl. E. 16, with some corrections, mainly from Parl. and Council Proc. (Chanc.) Roll 11. See also Latin version by a Bridlington writer in Chronicles of Edward I and Edward II (Rolls Series), II. 90.Google Scholar

^{page 102 note 1} Chronicon de Lanercost, p. 258Google Scholar: “duo milites ultra Trentam”.

^{page 102 note 2} Cf. Rot. Parl., III. 424Google Scholar, no. 59.

^{page 103 note 1} Below, p. 121, no. 13; Rot. Parl., II. 10Google Scholar (33).

^{page 103 note 2} Annales Paulini in Chronicles of Edward I and Edward II, I. 326–32Google Scholar; Birch, , Historical Charters of the City of London, pp. 52–8.Google Scholar

^{page 103 note 3} London unter Eduard I. and II., II. 256–60.Google Scholar

^{page 104 note 1} For these instruments see Annales Paulini, I. 325–6Google Scholar, and Cal. of Patent Rolls, 1327–30, p. 27.Google Scholar

^{page 104 note 2} Below, p. 163, no. 48.

^{page 105 note 1} Rot. Parl., II, 430–40Google Scholar. Another manuscript containing the same abstract is now in the British Museum, Additional no. 36824. We have collated it, and found it but a poor copy of the manuscript which underlay Titus E. I or of one nearly related to it.

^{page 105 note 2} Bulletin Inst. Hist. Research, IX. 16.Google Scholar

^{page 105 note 3} English Historical Review, 197–8, 381, 384 n.Google Scholar

^{page 107 note 1} Sic. MS.

^{page 108 note 1} Sic. MS.

^{page 108 note 2} Sic. MS.

^{page 108 note 3} Sic. MS.

^{page 110 note 1} MS. inserts “destre”, a false start which has been left uncancelled.

^{page 111 note 1} A.P. 5385. The verso is almost entirely illegible. The variant readings; and additions supplied by the endorsement are noted below.

^{page 111 note 2} Entered on Patent Roll, no. 66, m. 17, which has been collated.

^{page 113 note 1} A.P. 5385 is endorsed: “Viegne [deuant] le conseil ce qad este fait de ceste chose auant ces hures en parlement.” There then follows the further endorsement as in text above.

^{page 113 note 2} A.P. 5385, transcriptum.

^{page 113 note 3} A.P. 5385, ista.

^{page 113 note 4} A.P. 5385, etc. for sicut supra.

^{page 113 note 5} MS., factos: A.P. 5385, factis.

^{page 113 note 6} A.P. 5385 continues: “Ideo fiat breue de amoeione illa.”

^{page 114 note 1} Two or three words illegible.

^{page 114 note 2} Five or six words illegible.

^{page 114 note 3} Two or three words illegible.

^{page 116 note 1} Written above, but not as an original heading, are two lines in a small hand:—“Pointes de parlement. Ici commence la suite de Hugh …” The first petition corresponds to the first entry on Chancery Parliament Roll No. 1: see above p. 102.

^{page 116 note 2} MS. le.

^{page 116 note 3} Sic MS.

^{page 116 note 4} This petition corresponds to the second entry on Chancery Parliament Roll, no. 1: see above, p. 102.

^{page 117 note 1} This petition corresponds to the fifth and sixth entries on Chancery Parliament Roll no. 1: see above, p. 102.

^{page 117 note 2} MS. qi.

^{page 117 note 3} MS. omits.

^{page 118 note 1} MS. quele.

^{page 118 note 2} Rot. Parl., II. 8a, first paragraph: 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 2.

^{page 118 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 8a, second paragraph.

^{page 118 note 4} The next six words are vacated in Chancery Parliament Roll, no. 1, and are omitted in the Rotuli Parliamentorum.

^{page 118 note 5} Sic MS.

^{page 118 note 6} Rot. Parl., II. 8a (6).

^{page 119 note 1} Rot. Part., II 8a (7): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 3.

^{page 119 note 2} MS. issues.

^{page 119 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 9a (17).

^{page 119 note 4} Sic MS: Chanc. Parl. Roll, no. 1, dens.

^{page 119 note 5} A word such as granté is wanting.

^{page 119 note 6} Chanc. Parl. Roll, no. 1, inserts prelate, conies et grands.

^{page 119 note 7} Rot. Parl., II. 8a (8): 1 Edw. III. St. 2, cap. 4.

^{page 119 note 8} MS. tresores.

^{page 119 note 9} MS. omits.

^{page 120 note 1} Rot. Parl., II. 8a (9): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 5.

^{page 120 note 2} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (10): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 6, 7.

^{page 120 note 3} Recte xv.

^{page 120 note 4} Recte xx.

^{page 120 note 5} Rot. Parl., II, 8b (12): 1 Edw. III., St. 2, cap. 8.

^{page 120 note 6} MS. biens.

^{page 121 note 1} Chanc. Parl. Roll, no. 1, reads: “pleider a torns des viscuntes ne a letes”.

^{page 121 note 2} From this point the text of the paragraph is corrupt, due to a misreading of an abbreviation for viscuntes as vse and a subsequent attempt to make sense.

^{page 121 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 10b (33).

^{page 121 note 4} Repeated in MS.

^{page 121 note 5} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (13).

^{page 121 note 6} Ibid., 7a (1: lines 28–30): see above, p. 102.

^{page 121 note 7} Ibid., 7a (3: lines 6–20): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 1.

^{page 122 note 1} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (11): of. 1 Edw. III, St. 1, cap. 4.

^{page 122 note 2} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (14): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 9.

^{page 122 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 8b (15).

^{page 122 note 4} Ibid., 8b (16).

^{page 122 note 5} 24 September, 1326.

^{page 122 note 6} Rot. Parl., 9a (19).

^{page 122 note 7} MS. omits.

^{page 123 note 1} Rot. Parl., II. 9a (20).

^{page 123 note 2} MS. atrement.

^{page 123 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (21): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 11.

^{page 123 note 4} Sic MS.: rectius suent.

^{page 123 note 5} Rot. Parl., II. 10a (32): 1 Edw. III, St. 1, cap 5.

^{page 123 note 6} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (23).

^{page 123 note 7} Sic MS.: rectius prioms.

^{page 123 note 8} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (24).

^{page 123 note 9} MS., omits.

^{page 124 note 1} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (25).

^{page 124 note 2} Ibid., 9a (18).

^{page 124 note 3} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (22): 1 Edw. III, St. 1, cap. 7.

^{page 124 note 4} MS. graueff.

^{page 124 note 5} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (27): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 12.

^{page 124 note 6} Rot. Parl., II. 9b (28).

^{page 125 note 1} Rot. Parl., II. 10a (30): cf. 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 13.

^{page 125 note 2} Rot. Parl., II. 10b (34).

^{page 125 note 3} Ibid., 10b (35).

^{page 125 note 4} Ibid., 10b (37).

^{page 125 note 5} MS. omits.

^{page 125 note 6} Rot. Parl. II. 10b (36): 1 Edw. III, St. 2, cap. 15.

^{page 125 note 7} Rot. Parl., II. 10b (38: second and third paragraphs).

^{page 126 note 1} Repeated MS.

^{page 126 note 2} About ten words illegible.

^{page 126 note 3} About fifteen words illegible.

^{page 126 note 4} About six words illegible.

^{page 126 note 5} About fifteen words illegible.

^{page 126 note 6} About six words illegible.

^{page 126 note 7} About twenty words illegible.

^{page 126 note 8} One long word illegible.

^{page 126 note 9} Two or three words illegible.

^{page 126 note 10} About fifteen words illegible.

^{page 126 note 11} About ten words illegible.

^{page 127 note 1} Three or four words illegible.

^{page 127 note 2} “en les dites” erased.

^{page 127 note 3} The end of one word and the beginning of another illegible.

^{page 130 note 1} “qe nul atteint soit graunte sur gentz de la cite” struck through.

^{page 130 note 2} In cedula.

^{page 132 note 1} This article has been vacated.

^{page 132 note 2} Cf. Munimenta Gildhallae Londoniensis: Liber Custumarum, p. 254.Google Scholar

^{page 133 note 1} Against this article there is the marginal note “Fiat inde breue.”

^{page 133 note 2} Against this article there is the marginal note “Fiat carta per se”.

^{page 134 note 1} This article has been vacated.

^{page 134 note 2} Against this article there is the marginal note “Fiant inde breuia et littera patens ciuibus”.

^{page 134 note 3} Supplied by Faustina B.I, fo. 207.

^{page 135 note 1} This article has been vacated.

^{page 135 note 2} Faustina B.I, fo. 207b, gardeyns.

^{page 135 note 3} MS. maldes: Faustina B.I, malades.

^{page 135 note 4} Supplied by Faustina B.I.

^{page 135 note 5} MS. moire.

^{page 135 note 6} The reply is found in Faustina B.I only.

^{page 135 note 7} This article has been vacated.

^{page 136 note 1} The reply is found only in Faustina B.I, fo. 208.

^{page 136 note 2} This article is found only in Faustina B.I, fo. 208.

^{page 136 note 3} Against this article there is the marginal note “Fiat littera patens per se”.

^{page 136 note 4} Faustina B.I, fo. 206b, une maille.

^{page 136 note 5} Ibid., maille.

^{page 137 note 1} Against this writ there is the marginal note “Breue”.

^{page 137 note 2} Against this paragraph there is the marginal note “Aliud breue”.

^{page 137 note 3} This article has been vacated.

^{page 138 note 1} This article has been vacated, with the marginal note “Vacat quia alias”

^{page 138 note 2} This article has been vacated.

^{page 139 note 1} This article has been vacated.

^{page 139 note 2} This article has been vacated.

^{page 139 note 3} This article has been vacated.

^{page 140 note 1} Against this article there is the marginal note “Fiat inde patens”.

^{page 140 note 2} Faustina B.I, fo. 206b, reads deiuent estre.

^{page 141 note 1} Faustina B.I, fo. 208, lour.

^{page 141 note 2} Faustina B.I, seisir.

^{page 141 note 3} Faustina B.I. inserts auoir.

^{page 141 note 4} Faustina B.I. inserts si.

^{page 141 note 5} Acorde est qe struck through and Icheet …… conisaunce substituted. Faustina B.I reads: “Acorde est qe si rien soit meppris en desturbaunce de la puraille de redrescer le tort”.

^{page 143 note 1} MS. cartarunt.

^{page 143 note 2} MS. cartatam.

^{page 144 note 1} MS. omits.

^{page 144 note 2} Sic MS.

^{page 145 note 1} MS. Sulworth.

^{page 145 note 2} MS. Barford.

^{page 146 note 1} MS. Warthrop.

^{page 147 note 1} MS. Bromeham.

^{page 147 note 2} A.P. 868E.: see Appendix, p. 283.

^{page 147 note 3} MS. pendeunt.

^{page 147 note 4} Original petition supplies “super hoc premuniendi.”

^{page 148 note 1} MS. manu.

^{page 148 note 2} A note follows:—“Many petitions of this nature and the like answere.”

^{page 148 note 3} A note follows:—“Many petitions of this nature.”

^{page 149 note 1} The text has been taken from A.P. 8512 which was evidently copied on to the roll.

^{page 149 note 2} The text has been taken from A.P. 15467, which was evidently copied on to the roll.

^{page 150 note 1} A.P. 8336: see Appendix, p. 284.

^{page 153 note 1} About three words illegible.

^{page 153 note 2} MS. retornato.

^{page 153 note 3} Sic: 129l. in original petition.

^{page 155 note 1} The text has been taken from A.P. 8060, which was evidently copied on to the roll.

^{page 156 note 1} Blank in MS.

^{page 157 note 1} MS. fuit.

^{page 158 note 1} Blank in MS.

^{page 159 note 1} MS. distructi.

^{page 160 note 1} A note follows:—“Diuers peticions of this nature, vide rotulum 6 in dorso.”

^{page 160 note 2} MS. reads cartasset and similarly elsewhere.

^{page 161 note 1} A.P. 10244 is a duplicate.

^{page 161 note 2} The dorse bears also the inscription “Domino Thome de Sugd[on] per Willelmum de Broklesby”, and the impression of an oval seal. Brocklesby was a remembrancer of the exchequer.

^{page 162 note 1} MS. reads Witham and similarly below.

^{page 162 note 2} MS. omits.

^{page 162 note 3} MS. omits.

^{page 163 note 1} Sic MS.

^{page 163 note 2} A note follows:—There are many peticions of this nature for wronges donne by Hughe Spencer father and sonne.

^{page 164 note 1} MS. dentier.

^{page 165 note 1} MS. omits.

^{page 167 note 1} One or two words illegible.

^{page 167 note 2} About ten words illegible.

^{page 167 note 3} A word illegible.

^{page 167 note 4} Three or four words illegible.

^{page 168 note 1} MS. reads erroneously “Nicol”.

^{page 168 note 2} Supply “hundred”.

^{page 169 note 1} Sic.

^{page 171 note 1} Although the endorsement does not correspond with the enrolment, it seems evident that the petition was in terms identical with this.

^{page 172 note 1} A name is illegible.

^{page 172 note 2} One or two words illegible.

^{page 173 note 1} The text has been corrected by A.P. 8509.

^{page 173 note 2} Sic MS.

^{page 174 note 1} The text has been supplied from A.P. 8282.

^{page 175 note 1} Two or three words illegible.

^{page 175 note 2} Two or three words illegible.

^{page 175 note 3} One or two words illegible.

^{page 177 note 1} There is a further note endorsed: “Expectet propter traotatum h….”

^{page 177 note 2} MS. Hurgate.

^{page 178 note 1} MS. omits.