Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T16:23:21.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Table of Canterbury Archbishopric Charters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page v note 1 The reference is E36/137.

page vi note 1 The Lambeth list is referred to as L and the Record Office List as P.R.O.

page vi note 2 See Historical MSS. Commission Rep. V. p. 435Google Scholar, MS. C. 232. The note was made by W. Illingworth in Dec. 1806. His calendar of the Chapter House muniments is printed in 1837 Report on Public Records.

page vii note 1 For further details see ibid.Rep. VIII, p. 330.Google Scholar

page vii note 2 Ibid., p. 344.

page vii note 3 E.g., cf. Canterbury Chapter Library Cartae Antiquse, A 28, endorsed “Composicio inter archiepiscopum, priorem et conventum Cant' & comitem Glovernie” with the title in vas 16, p. 10 below.

page vii note 4 Register Pecham, f. 26 (ed. Rolls Series, vol. i, p. 172).

page vii note 6 Ibid., f. 112b (ed. Cant, and York Soc., p. 218). Cf. also “Some Thirteenth Century Registers” by Rev. Claude Jenkins, D.D., F.S.A., in Church Quarterly Review, 10 1924, p. 90.Google Scholar

page viii note 1 E.g. Register Langham, f. 96, 1366–7; Register Courteney, f. 182, 1390.

page viii note 2 Register Arundel, II, f. 91b–92.

page viii note 3 Ed. Battely, 1703, p. 96.

page viii note 4 Hasted, History of Kent, 1801, vol. xi, p. 376.Google Scholar

page viii note 5 Archœologia Cantiana, vol. vii, pp. 7482.Google Scholar

page viii note 6 In Register I, Chapter Library, Canterbury, is a section headed “Certa loca ubi littere et instrumenta diuersa reponuntur,” but the list contains neither the name Vestiarium, Thesauraria or Armariolum. See H. MSS. C. Rep. IX, p. 74.Google Scholar

page viii note 7 Inventories of Christ Church, Canterbury, ed. J. Wickham Legg and W. H. St John Hope, 1902, p. 234.Google Scholar

page ix note 1 The Works of Archbishop Laud, vol. vii, p. 346Google Scholar: Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology.

page ix note 2 MS. C. 232, see above p. vi, note 2.

page ix note 3 “Unde notandum quod in magno armariolo quod in duas partes diuiditur xxxa vasa veraciter continentur uidilicet in qualibet parte xv.”

page ix note 4 Cf. Cal. of Letters and Papers, Hen. VIII, 1540, No. 613 (32).

page ix note 5 Public Records Commission Report, 1837, p. 39Google Scholara. The next paragraph might contain the description of the list from which Somner copied.

page x note 1 Cal. of Letters and Papers, Hen. VIII, vol. v. No. 450.

page 2 note 1 Cf. Lambeth MS. 1212, f. 1.

page 2 note 2 This should be temp. Hen. II.

page 2 note 3 There was no archbishop of Canterbury named William during the reign of Henry II, but William de Curbellio was archbishop 1123–36, and in MS. 1212 there is a charter with this title in the list for Henry I.

page 2 note 4 Presumably, Henry the crowned son of Henry II. See p. vi.

page 3 note 1 This must be Henry III, 1216–72 (see above p. 2, n 4). Cf. Lambeth MS. 1212, where these titles appear in the list for Henry III, and also the titles themselves and archbishops mentioned in them, all pointing to this date.

page 3 note 2 The grant is dated 6 October, 1229, in Cal. of Charter Rolls, I, p. 101.

page 3 note 3 7 May, 1235. Cf. Cal. of Charter Rolls, I, p. 202. The next title in this list appears to refer to the same charter and in MS. 1212 this title is noted as being in duplicate. There is no other charter given in the Calendar of Charter Rolls.

page 3 note 4 The contents of this vase “b” should go after those of vase 7, marked with “a.”

page 3 note 5 Cf. Dugdale, , Monasticon Anglicanum, ed. 1846, I p. 110.Google Scholar

page 4 note 1 Lambeth MS. 1212 has Menyl.

page 5 note 1 Lambeth MS. 1212 has “Kingislee in foresta de Kinefare.” Cf. R.C. Rotuli Chartarum, p. 153Google Scholar, 1 June, 1205.

page 5 note 2 This title in Lambeth MS. 1212 is noted as in duplicate; here entered twice.

page 5 note 3 Possibly this is a duplicate of the title below relating to the market at Northflete. Lambeth MS. 1212 has only one such.

page 5 note 4 The name is Emericus de Caurceis in R.C. Rotuli Chartarum, p. 138Google Scholar, 6 October, 6 John [1204].

page 7 note 1 Rest of page blank.

page 8 note 1 See V.C.H. Sussex, II, p. 63.

page 9 note 1 So extended in Lambeth MS. 1212.

page 9 note 2 Cf. Dugdale, , Monasticon Anglicanum, ed. 1846, I, p. 134Google Scholar, “de divisis cuiusdem more et brochi Serle: in Lambeth MS. 1212, Broco in Scyrle.

page 9 note 3 Cf. Archbishop Pecham's Register, f. 113, printed in Wilkins, ' Concilia, II, p. 114, 1285–6.Google Scholar

page 10 note 1 Elected 20 July, 1274.

page 13 note 1 Cf. Tanner, , Notitia Monastica, p. 215Google Scholar, quitclaim of Okeneland and Heriet, 1268.

page 14 note 1 A grant to Hamo de la Marler is entered on Archbishop Reynolds' Register, f. 284b, under date 12 May, 9 Ed. II, 1316.

page 17 note 1 For an account of the Interdict. 1298–1299, see Miss Rose Graham, M.A., F.S.A., in Archœological Journal, Vol. LXXVIIIGoogle Scholar, Nos. 309–312, 2nd Series, Vol. XXVIII, Nos. 1–4, pp. 227–232, 1921.

page 17 note 2 Cf. Archbishop Winchelsey's Register, f. 286b, 1302.

page 18 note 1 Ralph of Shrewsbury's election was confirmed by Archbishop Simon de Meopham 21 July, 1329. See Le Neve, Fasti, ed. T. D. Hardy.