No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Lessons Learned in Developing and Testing a Methotrexate Case Study for Pharmacy Education
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2020
Abstract
This article describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a complex methotrexate ethics case used in teaching a Pharmacy Law and Ethics course. Qualitative analysis of student reflective writings provided useful insight into the students’ experience and comfort level with the final ethics case in the course. These data demonstrate a greater student appreciation of different perspectives, the potential for conflict in communicating about such cases, and the importance of patient autonomy. Faculty lessons learned are also described, facilitating adoption of this methotrexate ethics case by other healthcare profession educators.
- Type
- Departments and Columns
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2020
Footnotes
Acknowledgement: The authors are grateful to Joy Plein and all of our other colleagues in the University of Washington School of Pharmacy Faculty Writing Group who provided valuable feedback on manuscript revisions.
The aim of this section is to expand and accelerate advances in methods of teaching bioethics.
References
Notes
1. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Guidance For The Accreditation Standards And Key Elements For The Professional Program In Pharmacy Leading To The Doctor Of Pharmacy Degree. “Guidance For Standards 2016”; available at https://www.acpe-acredit.org/pdf/GuidanceforStandards2016FINAL.pdf (last accessed 2 Aug 2018).
2. For example, Vetach, R, Haddad, AM, English, DC. Case Studies in Biomedical Ethics: Decision-Making, Principles, and Cases, New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010 Google Scholar; and, Gettman, D, Arneson, D. PharmacoEthics: A Problem Based Approach, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Buerki, RA, Votter, LD. Pharmacy Ethics: A Foundation for Professional Practice. Washington, DC: American Pharmacists Association; 2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wingfield, J, Badcott, D. Pharmacy Ethics and Decision Making. London, Chicago: Pharmaceutical Press; 2007 Google Scholar.
3. Henning, MA, Malpas, P, Ram, S, Rajput, V, Krstić, V, Boyd, M, et al. Students’ responses to scenarios depicting ethical dilemmas: A study of pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand. Journal of Medical Ethics 2016; 42:466–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
4. The UW Doctor of Pharmacy program lasts four years. The first three years are primarily didactic and laboratory based; the fourth year is experiential.
5. See Hurd, PD. Active learning. Journal of Pharmacy Teaching 2000;7:3–4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stewart, DW, Brown, SD, Claiver, CW, Wyatt, J. Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2011;75(4):1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
6. The other five ethics case categories were linked to didactic subject areas, specifically: end-of-life, multicultural practice settings, long-term care, professionalism, and the beginning of life.
7. Barash JH, Buchanan EM, Hillson C. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. American Family Physician 2014;90(1):34–40.
8. Dickens, BM, Faundes, A, Cook, RJ. Ectopic pregnancy and emergency care: Ethical and legal issues. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2003;82:121–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
9. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Frequently Asked Questions FAQ Ectopic Pregnancy 155; available at https://www.acog.org/Patients/FAQs/Ectopic-Pregnancy (last accessed 31 Dec 2018).
10. Pacholczyk T. When Pregnancy Goes Awry: Ectopic Pregnancies; available at https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/science/ethical-issues/when-pregnancy-goes-awry-ectopic-pregnancies.html (last accessed 31 Dec 2018).
11. DiVall, MV, Alston, GL, Bird, E, Buring, SM, Kelley, KA, Murphy, NL, et al. A faculty toolkit for formative assessment in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmacy Education 2014;78(9):6 Google ScholarPubMed.
12. Root, H, Waterfield, J. An evaluation of a reflective writing assessment within the MPharm programme. Pharmacy Education 2015;15(1):142–4Google Scholar.
13. Roy, V, Collins, LG, Sokas, CM, Lim, E, Umland, E, Speakman, E, et al., Student reflections on interprofessional education: moving from concepts to collaboration. Journal of Allied Health. 2016;45(2):111 Google ScholarPubMed.
14. Drisko, J, Maschi, T. Content Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15. Saldaña, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009 Google Scholar.