Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T11:11:57.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Four Themes in Recent Swedish Bioethics Debates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2011

Extract

A wide variety of bioethical themes have recently been debated and researched in Sweden, including genetic screening, HPV vaccination strategies, end-of-life care, injustices and priority setting in healthcare, dual-use research, and the never-ending story of scientific fraud. Also, there are some new events related to Swedish biobanking that might be of general interest. Here we will concentrate on four themes: end-of-life care, dual-use research, scientific fraud, and biobanking.

Type
Special Section: Bioethics beyond Borders 2011
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See, e.g., the debate contributions gathered by Läkartidningen, journal of the Swedish Medical Association; available at http://www.lakartidningen.se/07engine.php?articleId=11190 (last accessed 20 Nov 2010) and http://www.lakartidningen.se/07engine.php?articleId=11610 (last accessed 20 Nov 2010).

2. See note 1, the second link.

3. Ohlin, E, Lövtrup, M. Astrid Lindgren-fallet: Läkaren åtalad för dråp [The Astrid Lindgren case: The physician charged for manslaughter]. Läkartidningen 2010;107(6):317.Google Scholar

4. Tarschys, D. Återhållsamhet kan skapa onödigt lidande [Restraint might cause unnecessary suffering]. Svenska Dagbladet 2009 Mar 15Google Scholar; Hammarlund, C-O. Den juridiska processen gör alla inblandade till offer [The legal process makes everyone involved a victim]. Läkartidningen 2009;106(11):728.Google Scholar

5. Forty-five intensive-care physicians. Avbruten behandling är inte dödshjälp [Withdrawal of treatment is not euthanasia]. Svenska Dagbladet 2009 Mar 10Google Scholar; Gunnarsdotter, S. För en person som är döende finns ingen anledning att snåla in på smärtlindring [There is no reason to be mean with painkillers for a dying person]. Läkartidningen 2009;106(12):866–7.Google Scholar

6. Haverdahl, A-L. Kvinna ber om hjälp att få dö [Woman asks for help to die]. Svenska Dagbladet 2010 Mar 18.Google Scholar

7. See note 6, Haverdahl 2010.

8. Haverdahl, A-L. Svårt sjuka får mer makt över sin död [The severely ill get more power over their death]. Svenska Dagbladet 2010 Apr 26.Google Scholar

9. Engström, I. När får man avbryta livsuppehållande behandling? [When is it allowed to withdraw life support treatment?] Läkartidningen 2010;107(12):808.Google Scholar

10. Lindblad, A, Löfmark, R, Lynöe, N. Would physician-assisted suicide jeopardize trust in the medical services? An empirical study of attitudes among the general public in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2009;37(3):260–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Lindblad, A, Löfmark, R, Lynöe, N. Physician-assisted suicide: A survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2008;36(7):720–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Lindblad, A, Juth, N, Fürst, CJ, Lynöe, N. Continuous deep sedation, physician-assisted suicide, and euthanasia in Huntington’s disorder. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 2010;16(11):527–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Lindblad, A, Juth, N, Fürst, CJ, Lynöe, N. When enough is enough; terminating life-sustaining treatment at the patient’s request: a survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians and the general public. Journal of Medical Ethics 2010;36(5):284–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Cohen, J, Bilsen, J, Fischer, S, Löfmark, R, Norup, M, van der Heide, A, et al. . End-of-life decision-making in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland: Does place of death make a difference? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007;61(12):1062–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cohen, J, van Delden, J, Mortier, F, Löfmark, R, Norup, M, Cartwright, C, et al. . Influence of physicians’ life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34(4):247–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; see also Hoff, L, Hermerén, G. Information from physicians and retention of information by patients: Obstacles to the awareness of patients of progressing disease when life is near the end. BMC Palliative Care 2008;28(7):2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. See note 10, Lindblad et al. 2009; Lindblad et al. 2008.

12. See note 10, Lindblad et al. 2010 on Huntington’s disease.

13. See note 10, Lindblad et al. 2009; Lindblad et al. 2008.

14. See note 10, Lindblad et al. 2010 on terminating life-sustaining treatment.

15. Swedish Society of Medicine, delegation of ethics. Etiska riktlinjer för palliativ sedering i livets slutskede [Ethical Guidelines for Palliative Sedation at the End of Life], adopted August 24, 2010.

16. Leijonhufvud, M, Lynöe, N. Sederingsterapi som förkortar livet—dråp eller adekvat behandling? [Sedation therapy that shortens life—Homicide or adequate treatment?] Läkartidningen 2010;107(45):2772–3.Google Scholar

17. Juth, N, Lindblad, A, Lynöe, N, Sjöstrand, M, Helgesson, G. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) framework for palliative sedation: An ethical discussion. BMC Palliative Care 2010;9(1):20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. The Law on control over products with dual-use and over technical assistance (SFS 2000:1064); the Ordinance on control of products with dual-use and of technical assistance (SFS 2000:1217).

19. Swedish Security Service. Att skydda svensk bioteknik [Protecting Swedish biotech]. Stockholm: Swedish Security Service; 2004. The brochure is available at the Codex Web site: http://www.codex.vr.se (last accessed 20 Nov 2010).

20. World Health Organization. Laboratory Biosecurity Guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006:iiii.Google Scholar

21. Council of the European Union. Council Joint Action 2008/307/CFSP of 14 April 2008 in support of World Health Organisation activities in the area of laboratory bio-safety and bio-security in the framework of the European Union Strategy against the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Official Journal L 106, 16/04/2008 P. 0017–0023.

22. Skeri, N. Spionaget mot forskningen ökar [Espionage on research on the increase]. Uppsala Nya Tidning 11 Nov 2009.Google Scholar

23. European Commission, CORDIS. Getting through ethics review, dual use (FP 7); available at http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ethics_en.html (last accessed 20 Nov 2010).

24. Swedish Security Service. Vad är det du exporterar? Och till vem? [What are you exporting? And to whom?] Stockholm: Swedish Security Service; 2010. (The brochure is available at the Codex Web site; see note 19.)

25. Clevestig, P. Handbook of Applied Biosecurity for Life Science Laboratories. Stockholm: SIPRI; 2009.Google Scholar

26. Kuhlau, F, Eriksson, S, Evers, K, Höglund, AT. Taking due care: Moral obligations in dual use research. Bioethics 2008;22:477–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

27. A second article focuses on the precautionary principle and its possible application to research in the life sciences. Kuhlau, F, Höglund, AT, Evers, K, Eriksson, S. A precautionary principle for dual use research in the life sciences. Bioethics 2011;25(1):1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

28. Forsman, B. Tandlöst förslag mot forskningsfusk [Toothless bill on research misconduct]. Forskning & Framsteg 2009(1); available at http://www.fof.se/tidning/2009/1/tandlost-forslag-mot-forskningsfusk (last accessed 20 Nov 2010).Google Scholar

29. Hermerén, G, Omling, P. Hårdare tag mot fuskande forskare [Tougher times for cheaters]. Svenska Dagbladet 2010 Oct 7.Google Scholar

30. See note 29, Hermerén, Omling 2010.

31. National Board of Health and Welfare. Register; available at http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/register (last accessed 20 Nov 2010).

32. LifeGene homepage; available at https://www.lifegene.se/ (last accessed 20 Nov 2010).

33. Árnason, V. Coding and consent: Moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 2004;18:27–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Caulfield, T. Biobanks and blanket consent: The proper place of the public good and public perception rationales. Kings Law Journal 2007;18:209–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarElger, B. Consent and use of samples. In: Elger, B, Biller-Andorno, N, Mauron, A, Capron, AM, eds. Ethical Issues in Governing Biobanks. Global Perspectives. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing; 2008:57–88Google Scholar; Hofmann, B. Broadening consent—and diluting ethics? Journal of Medical Ethics 2009;35:125–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

34. Nilstun, T, Hermerén, G. Human tissue samples and ethics—attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research. Medicine, Health Care & Philosophy 2006;9:81–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Melas, PA, Sjöholm, LK, Forsner, T, Edhborg, M, Juth, N, Forsell, Y, Lavebratt, C. Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: Empirical data from a Swedish population-based study. Journal of Medical Ethics 2010;36:93–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Johnsson, L, Helgesson, G, Rafnar, T, Chia, K-S, Eriksson, S, Halldorsdottir, I, Hansson, MG. Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research. European Journal of Human Genetics 2010;18:1261–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Johnsson, L, Hansson, MG, Eriksson, S, Helgesson, G. Patients’ refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: Cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal 2008;337:a345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Helgesson, G, Swartling, U. Views on data use, confidentiality, and consent in a predictive screening involving children. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34:206–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hansson, MG, Dillner, J, Bartram, CR, Carlson, JA, Helgesson, G. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncology 2006;7(3):266–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Helgesson, G, Dillner, J, Carlson, J, Bartram, CR, Hansson, MG. Ethical framework for previously collected biobank samples. Nature Biotechnology 2007;25:973–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Hansson, MG. Ethics and biobanks. British Journal of Cancer 2009;100:8–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Helgesson, G, Eriksson, S. Does informed consent have an expiry date? A critical reappraisal of informed consent as a process. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2011;20(1):85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hansson, MG. The need to downregulate: A minimal ethical framework for biobank research. Methods of Molecular Biology 2011;675:39–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

35. Hofmann, BM. Bypassing consent for research on biological material. Nature Biotechnology 2008;26(9):979–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; cf. Bexelius, C, Hoeyer, K, Lynöe, N. Will forensic use of medical biobanks decrease public trust in healthcare services? Some empirical observations. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2007;35:442–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

36. Alskog, A. PKU-biobanken öppnas inte för polisen [The PKU biobank is not opened for the police]. Riksdag & Departement, 2010 Oct 5; available at http://www.rod.se/v%C3%A5rd/pku-biobanken-%C3%B6ppnas-inte-f%C3%B6r-polisen (last accessed 20 Nov 2010).Google Scholar