Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T03:58:30.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary: Denial or Delusion?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Karen Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Ethics Committees and Consultants at Work
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 473 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Drane, JF. Competency to give an informed consent: A model for making clinical decisions. JAMA 1984 Aug 17;252(7):925–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. See note 1, Drane 1984.

3. See note 1, Drane 1984.

4. See note 1, Drane 1984.

5. Northern v. Tennessee Department of Human Services, 435 U.S. 950 (1978); available at http://law.justia.com/cases/tennessee/court-of-appeals/1978/563-s-w-2d-197-1.html (last accessed 14 February 2013).

6. See note 5, Northern v. Tennessee Department of Human Services 1978.

7. Schlimme, JE. Is acting on delusions autonomous? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2013;8(14)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; available at http://www.peh-med.com/content/8/1/14 (last accessed 3 Apr 2014).

8. See note 7, Schlimme 2013.

9. See note 7, Schlimme 2013.