Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T02:41:46.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A NORMATIVE ACCOUNT OF DEFENCES TO RESTITUTIONARY LIABILITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2008

Ross Grantham
Affiliation:
T C Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland.
Charles Rickett
Affiliation:
T C Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland.
Get access

Extract

The modern law of unjust enrichment is unique in many respects. In one sense, it is the newest and most significant development in the private law for a very long time. While it can claim ancient roots, as a discrete body of law unjust enrichment has only emerged from the long shadows of the law of contract in the last 20 years. The development and content of the law of unjust enrichment has, to a greater extent than perhaps anywhere else in the private law, been driven and shaped by academic rather than judicial influences. The law of unjust enrichment is also distinguished from the other principal heads of civil obligation in that its focus is on stripping the defendant of gains made rather than making good losses suffered by the plaintiff. Perhaps most controversially, the role or function of unjust enrichment may differ from the other principal parts of the private law in that the source of the entitlement protected is not found within the law of unjust enrichment, but in other areas of the law.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)