Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T04:24:40.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

If at First… Undue Influence and the House of Lords

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2002

Mika Oldham
Get access

Extract

The House of Lords in Royal Bank of Scotland plc v. Etridge (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 44, [2001] 3 W.L.R. 1021 refined and reformulated the principles laid down in Barclays Bank plc v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. Among other things, Etridge sets out new minimum requirements for mortgagees who take third party security from wives or partners and for solicitors whose task it is in such cases to advise the surety.

Type
Case and Comment
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , 07 March 2002 , pp. 29 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)