Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-4wks4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-04-02T10:17:24.976Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The Archaeological and Genetic Foundations of the European Population during the Late Glacial: Implications for ‘Agricultural Thinking’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2005

Clive Gamble
Centre for Quaternary Research, Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX, UK;
William Davies
Centre for Quaternary Research, Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX, UK;
Paul Pettitt
Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield, UK.
Lee Hazelwood
AHRB Centre for the Evolutionary Analysis of Cultural Behaviour, University of Southampton, Avenue Campus, Highfield, Southampton, UK.
Martin Richards
Faculty of Biological Sciences, L.C. Miall Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article presents the initial results from the S2AGES data base of calibrated radiocarbon estimates from western Europe in the period 25,000–10,000 years ago. Our aim is to present a population history of this sub-continental region by providing a chronologically-secure framework for the interpretation of data from genetics and archaeology. In particular, we define five population events in this period, using dates-as-data, and examine the implications for the archaeology of Late Glacial colonization. We contrast this detailed regional approach to the larger project which we call the cognitive origins synthesis that includes historical linguistics in the reconstruction of population history. We conclude that only archaeology can currently provide the framework for population history and the evaluation of genetic data. Finally, if progress is to be made in the new interdisciplinary field of population history then both disciplines need to refrain from inappropriate agricultural thinking that fosters distorting models of European prehistory, and they should also pay less, if any, attention to historical linguistics.

With comments from L.G. Straus, J.-P. Bocquet-Appel, P.A. Underhill & R. Housley and followed by a reply from the author.

Research Article
2005 The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research