Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T15:20:31.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cavafy’s Barbarians and their Western Genealogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Dimitris Tziovas*
Affiliation:
Centre for Byzantine Studies and Modern Greek, University of Birmingham

Extract

‘Waiting for the Barbarians’ is probably the most discussed of Cavafy’s poems after ‘The God abandons Antony’. Its sources, its date of composition and its diachronic symbolism, along with Cavafy’s unfathomable intentions, have generated a large number of interpretations and debates. Reading the poem today one cannot escape from these layers of interpretation, a kind of metadiscourse which regulates the new approaches either compliant or defiant to those already existent. It seems that the accumulated interpretations of a literary text sometimes discomfort those who seek stable and obvious meanings rather than a multiplicity of opinions and conflicting approaches. The very bulk of scholarship related to a certain poem or poet discourages a new reading and makes the critic hesitant and apprehensive. Nevertheless the diversity of interpretive approaches helps us both to realize their relativity and to ascribe them entirely to the various interpreters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Said, Edward, ‘The Text, the World, The Critic’ in Harari, Josué V., ed., Textual Strategies — Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism (London 1979) 165.Google Scholar

2. Papanoutsos, E.P., (Athens 1955) 176.Google Scholar

3. Paraschos, Kleon, 1 (8) (March 1921) 121 Google Scholar. Also, in Muriel Spark’s novel Girls of Slender Means (1963), one character quotes the last two lines of Cavafy’s poem.

4. Petridis, P.A., 5 (54) (March 1909) 204.Google Scholar

5. Ibid. 204.

6. Malanos, Timos, (Athens 1957) 300.Google Scholar

7. Ibid. 299. See also Malanos, Timos, 2 (Athens 1963) 64 Google Scholar and Yialourakis, M., (Athens 1975) 104111.Google Scholar

8. See Tsirkas, Stratis, (Athens3 1973) 89.Google Scholar

9. This note was first published in Peridis, M., (Athens 1948) 183 Google Scholar. Its final and restored form can be found in Cavafy, C.P. ed, Savidis, G.P. (Athens 1983) 61.Google Scholar

10. Agras, Tellos, (1922) in , vol. 1, ed. Kostas Stergiopoulos (Athens 1980) 4546.Google Scholar

11. Timos Malanos, op. cit., 300–301.

12. Poggioli, Renato, ‘Qualis Arifex Pereo! or Barbarian and Decadence’, Harvard Library Bulletin 13 (1959) 135159.Google Scholar

13. Savidis, G.P., 23 April 1983, p.9.Google Scholar

14. Gibbon, Edward, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, ed. Bury, J.B., IV (London 1909) 180.Google Scholar

15. Tsirkas, op. cit., 329.

16. Haas, Diana, ‘Cavafy’s Reading Notes on Gibbon’s ‘Decline and Fall’,’ Folia Neohellenica 4 (1982) 2596.Google Scholar

17. Gibbon, op. at., 176.

18. Hegel, G.W.F., The Philosophy of History (New York 1956) 103.Google Scholar

19. See Condorcet, Antoine — Nicolas de, Sketch for a historical picture of the progress of the human mind (1795), tr. Barraclough, >Jane (London 1955).Google Scholar

20. Turgot’s views on the Chinese reflect his attitude towards the Orient and its culture in general. He wrote about them “Les Chinois ont été fixés trop tôt. lis sont devenus comme ces arbres dont on a coupé la tige, et qui poussent des branches prés de terre. lis ne sortent jamais de la médiocrité” (Oeuvres de Turgot, II (Paris 1844) 662.)

21. Baumer, Franklin L., Modern European Thought — Continuity and Change in Ideas 1600–1950 (New York 1977) 266.Google Scholar

22. Lovejoy, Arthur O., in his The Great Chain of Being (Cambridge, Mass 1936)Google Scholar introduces the term ‘diversitarianism’ relating it to Romanticism (p. 294).

23. See Stocking, George W., Race, Culture and Evolution (N. York 1968) 36.Google Scholar

24. Arnold, M., Culture and Anarchy (London 1889) 63.Google Scholar

25. Burckhardt, Jakob, Force and Freedom, Reflections on History, ed. Nichols, James Hustings (N. York 1943) 259.Google Scholar

26. Nietzsche, Fr., The Gay Science, tr.Kaufmann, Walter (N. York 1974) 280.Google Scholar

27. Myers, Frederic W.H., Human Personality and its Survival of Bodily Death (London 1903) II, 27980.Google Scholar

28. “Le plus malin est de quitter ce continent, où la folie rôde pour pourvoir d’otages ces miserablés. J’entre au vrai royaume des enfants de Cham” (p. 97) “je retournais ä l’Orient et ä la sagesse première et éternelle” (p. 113) “Rien pour vous dans l’histoire des peuples orientaux. — C’est vrai; c’est ä L’Eden que je songeais! Qu’est-ce que c’est pour mon rêve, cette pureté des races antiques!

Les philosophes: Le monde n’a pas d’âge. L’humanité se déplace, simplement. Vous êtes en Occident, mais libre d’habiter dans votre Orient, quelque ancient qu’il vous le faille, — et d’y habiter bien. Ne soyez pas un vaincu. Philosophes, vous êtes de votre Occident.” (p. 113)

Rimbaud, Arthur, ‘Une Saison en Enfer’, in Oeuvres complètes (Paris 1972).Google Scholar

29. Nietzsche, Fr., ‘On the uses and disadvantages of history for life’ in Untimely Meditations, tr. Hollingdale, R.J. (Cambridge 1983) 116 Google Scholar. Another passage from Nietzsche reminds me of Cavafy’s Ithaka: “One day we reach our goal, and now point with pride to the long travels we undertook to reach it. In fact, we were not even aware of travelling. But we got so far because we fancied at every point that we were at home”. The Gay Science, op cit., 216.

30. Nietzsche, Fr., The Genealogy of Morals, tr. Golfing, Francis (New York 1956) 175.Google Scholar

31. Fr. Nietzsche, The Gay Science, 79.

32. The way the city’s officials in the poem are prepared to welcome the barbarians evokes again Nietzsche’s speculations about the results of a possible contact between a lower culture (barbarians) and a higher one: “What happens when barbarians come into contact with a higher culture — the lower culture always accepts first of all the vices, weaknesses, and excesses and only then, on that basis, finds a certain attraction in the higher culture and eventually, by way of the vices and weaknesses that it has acquired, also accepts some of the overflow of what really has value.” The Gay Science, 152.

33. Hayden White, in his attempt to reconstruct the genealogy of the Wild Man myth, argues that concepts such as barbarism and wildness “arise out of the need for men to dignify their specific mode of existence by contrasting it with those of other men, real or imagined, who merely differed from themselves” (‘The Forms of Wildness: Archaeology of an Idea’, in Dudley, E. & Novak, M.F., eds., The Wild Man within: An Image in Western Thought from the Renaissance to Romanticism (Pittsburgh 1972) 5 Google Scholar. He also points out that the Wild Man and the barbarian represented different kinds of threats especially during the Middle Ages. The former represented a threat to individual whereas the latter a threat to society to civilization and to racial excellence.

34. See Emile Durkheim’s Le Suicide (1897) and his thesis De la division du travail social (1893).