Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T05:27:07.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High Finance/Low Strategy: Corporate Collapse in the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry, 1919–1932

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

Barry E.C. Boothman
Barry E.C. Boothman
Affiliation:
BARRY E. C.BOOTHMAN is associate professor of strategic management in the Faculty of Administration atthe University of New Brunswick.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of the pulp and paper sector has been a highly controversial subject in Canadian business history. During the 1920s, there was a rapid growth of capacity (which reached twice the level of market demand) and a series of mergers as different firms sought to attain giant size. By 1928 several leading companies were experiencing difficulties, and by 1932 half of the producers were bankrupt while the remainder hovered on the brink of insolvency. These developments had their own logic and were driven by strategic issues and the formation of an institutional market for industrial securities. As corporate executives propelled their firms into dubious strategies characterized by excess production and unrealistic dividend policies, the status of the newsprint producers was obscured from investors by financial and accounting practices, thereby contributing to a flood of investment, which was followed by corporate collapse. The attempts to reorganize the companies began a complex process that lasted anywhere from several years to more than a decade.

Type
Articles
Information
Business History Review , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , Winter 2000 , pp. 611 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr , The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, 1977), 377–500Google Scholar; Du Boff, Richard B., and Herman, Edward S., “Alfred Chandler's New Business History: A Review,” Politics and Society 10 (1980): 87–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hannah, Leslie, “Scale and Scope: Towards a European Visible Hand?” Business History 33 (1991): 297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Supple, Barry, “Scale and Scope: Alfred Chandler and the Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism,” Economic History Review 54 (1991): 500–14Google Scholar; Tolliday, Steven, ed., “Scale and Scope: A Review Colloquium,” Business History Review 64 (1990): 690–735Google Scholar; Sabel, Charles and Zeitlin, Jonathan, “Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization,” Past and Present 108 (1985): 133–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See especially the balanced overview by John, Richard R., “Elaborations, Revisions, Dissents: Alfred D. Chandler Jr.' The Visible Hand After Twenty Years,” Business History Review 71 (1997): 151–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Bell, Daniel,The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism (New York, 1976), 3–30.Google Scholar See also Fukuyama, Francis, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (New York, 1995).Google Scholar

3 Canada Year Booh (Ottawa, 1930), 951–4; (Ottawa, 1935), 1033–5.

4 The best study of contemporary failures is Clarke, Frank, Dean, Graeme, and Oliver, Kyle, Corporate Collapse: Regulatory, Accounting and Ethical Failure (Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar Other useful works include: Thomas Johnson, H. and Kaplan, Robert S., Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting (Boston, 1987)Google Scholar; Hawkins, David F., “The Development of Modern Financial Reporting Practices Among American Manufacturing Companies,” Business History Review 37 (1963): 135–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brief, Richard P., ed., Corporate Financial Reporting and Analysis in the Early 1900s (New York, 1986)Google Scholar; Miranti, Paul J., Accountancy Comes of Age: The Development of an American Profession, 1886–1940 (Chapel Hill, 1990)Google Scholar; Edwards, John R., “Company Legislation and Changing Patterns of Disclosure in British Company Accounts, 1900–1940”; Edwards, John R., ed., Studies of Company Records, 1830–1940 (New York, 1984), 71–155.Google Scholar

5 McElvame, Robert S., The Great Depression: America, 1929–1941 (New York, 1993), 25–50, 138–69Google Scholar; McCraw, Thomas K., Prophets of Regutøion: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred E.Kahn (Cambridge, 1984), 149–203Google Scholar; Carosso, Vincent P., Investment Banking in America: A History (Cambridge, 1970).Google Scholar Popular images of financial practices during the “Roaring 20s” are well captured in the following: Allen, Frederick L., The Lords of Creation (New York, 1935)Google Scholar; Lowenthal, Max, The Investor Pays (New York, 1933)Google Scholar; Galbraith, John K., The Great Crash: 1929 (Boston, 1954)Google Scholar; and Cowing, Cedric B., Populists, Plungers and Progressives: A Social History of Stock and Commodity Speculation, 1890–1936 (Princeton, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Most commentaries rely upon Forsey, Eugene, “The Pulp and Paper Industry,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 1 (1935); 501–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 H. V.Nelles, The Politics of Development: Forests, Mines and Hydro-Electric Power in Ontario, 1849–1941 (Toronto, 1974); Piédalue, Gilles, “Les Groupes Financiers au Canada 1900–1930,” Revue d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française 30 (1976): 3–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Piédalue, Gilles, “Les Groupes Financiers et la Guerre du Papier au Canada, 1920–1930,” Revue d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française 30 (1976): 223–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Armstrong, Christopher, Blue Skies and Boiler Rooms: Buying and Selling Securities in Canada, 1880–1940 (Toronto, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Smith, David C., “Wood Pulp and Newspapers, 1867–1900,” Business History Review 38 (1964): 328–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McGaw, Judith A., Most Wonderful Machine: Mechanization and Social Change in Berkshire Paper Making, 1801–1885 (Princeton, 1987), ch. 7.Google Scholar

10 Cohen, J., “Technological Change as Historical Process: The Case of the U.S. Pulp and Paper Industry, 1915–1940,” Journal of Economic History 44 (1989): 779Google Scholar; Lamoreaux, Naomi R., The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904 (Cambridge, 1985), 43–5, 139–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Caves, Richard E., Fortunato, M., and Ghemawat, P., “The Decline of Dominant Firms, 1905–1929,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (1984): 523–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Niosi, Jorge, “La Laurentide (1887–1928): Pionnière du Papier Journal Au Canada,” Revue d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française 29 (1975): 375–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Charland, Jean-Pierre, Pâtes et papiers au Québec, 1880–1980: technologies, travail et travailleurs (Québec, 1990), 95–140.Google Scholar

12 PPMC, 2 Feb. 1927, 187; Nelles, The Politics of Development, 48–107; Kellogg, Royal S., Pulpwood and Woodpulp in North Anwrica (New York, 1923), 224–32.Google Scholar

13 Dick, Trevor J. O., “Canadian Newsprint, 1913–1930; National Policies and the North American Economy,” Journal of Economic History 42 (1982); 661–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, Reference Tobies (Montreal, 1954)Google Scholar, table 67: 54. See also U.S. Tariff Commission, Tariff Information (Washington, D.C., 1923), 33–6.Google Scholar The agency placed the Canadian cost advantage at $3.10 to $5.35 per ton between 1913 and 1916, owing to cheaper pulp and low-cost wood.

14 Statistics Canada, Historical Statistics of Canada, 2nd ed. (Ottawa, 1983)Google Scholar, series F334–4, F342–8, G188–202.

15 Barry E. C.Boothman, “The Foundations of Canadian Big Business,” Fifth Canadian Business History Conference (1998).

16 PPMC, 4 August 1921, 816. Discussions of the Riordan failure and the implications were extensive in newspapers from 1921 to 1925. Observers tended to blame Izaak W.Killam and Royal Securities for floating the Riordan securities and then refusing to make concessions to creditors.

17 Guthrie, John A., The Newsprint Paper Industry: An Economic Analysis (Boston, 1941), 59–60Google Scholar; Marshall, Herbert, Southard, Frank A., and Taylor, Kenneth W., Canadian-American Industry (Boston, 1936), 41–4Google Scholar; Parenteau, William, “The Woods Transformed: The Emergence of the Pulp and Paper Industry in New Brunswick,” Acadiensis 22 (1992): 22–31Google Scholar; Hillier, J., “The Politics of Newsprint: The Newfoundland Newsprint Industry, 1915–39,” Acadiensis 19 (1990): 3–39.Google Scholar

18 Most authors have related the overexpansion to American demand, and the impact of technological imperatives upon corporate strategies has been largely ignored. Reviews of mills or the introduction of new machinery were featured items in Pulp and Paper Maga zine of Canada from 1921 to 1931. See also Stevenson, Louis T., The Background and Eco nomics of American Papermaking (New York, 1940).Google Scholar

19 Guthrie, The Newsprint Paper Industry, 116–26.

20 This narrative is drawn from my essay ";Night of the Longest Day: The Receivership of Abitibi Power and Paper,” in Boothman, Barry E. C., ed., ASAC Proceedings: Business History 14, 15 (1994): 22–32.Google Scholar

21 Armstrong, Christopher and Nelles, H. V., Monopoly's Moment: The Organization and Regulation of Canadian Utilities (Toronto, 1988), 101–6, 297–9Google Scholar; McDowall, Duncan, Quick to the Frontier: Canada's Royal Bank (Toronto, 1993), 82, 239–43.Google Scholar

22 ANQ-M, consolidated Bathurst papers, minute books of directors' meetings, M-8–6, 25 Nov. 1925, 43–6; M-9–7, 9 Dec. 1925, 51.

23 Proceedings of the Select Standing Committee of the House of Commons on Banking and Commerce, 22 May 1934, 826.

24 Piédalue, “Guerre de Papier,” 240; UTA, T79–0086, Robert N. McEachern, “Corporate Reorganizations,” M.A. thesis (University of Toronto, 1934), 4; UTA T79–0083, Dell, Hubert C., “A Financial Analysis of Some Recent Consolidations in the Pulp and Paper Industry,” M.A. thesis (University of Toronto, 1934), 102.Google Scholar

25 The narrative about Backus-Brooks is derived from numerous sources, especially: AO, F9, MU 1353, env. 1, circular, E. W.Backus to Minnesota and Ontario Bondholders, 5 Jan. 1934; RG 49–19, 1922, no. 76, “English River/Backus Correspondence”; RG 49–19, 1925, no. 65, “Great Lakes Paper Correspondence.”

26 PPMC, Dec. 1912, 370.

27 PPMC, 25 May 1922, 424.

28 PPMC, 4 Jan. 1917, 1.

29 Extrapolated by the author from annual data published in Government of Canada, Report of the Superintendent of Insurance of the Dominion of Canada: Life Insurance Companies, 1901–1931.

30 Government of Canada, Report of the Superintendent of Insurance, 1923 (Ottawa, 1924), 4–7.Google Scholar

31 The exception to the trend was London Life, which expanded heavily into mortgages for urban real estate and only undertook significant newsprint investments just prior to the Wall Street crash. London Life Archives, James Campbell et al., A History of London Life Insurance (unpublished typescript), 388–447.

32 1926 address to Sun Life sales agents, quoted in Harris, George H., The President's Book: The Story of the Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (Montreal, 1928), 194.Google Scholar

33 Harris, The President's Book, 193, 196; Schull, Joseph, The Century of the Sun: The First Hundred Years of the Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (Toronto, 1971), 58.Google Scholar

34 MCLA, 81.22.152, Bond Department, “A History of the Investments of Mutual Life Assurance of Canada in Pulp and Paper Company Securities,” 23 May 1933. The company's official history minimized the selection of poor investment vehicles, noting merely that “it appears that this type of investment was given too much emphasis for many of these corporation bonds, especially those of pulp and paper companies, fell into default in the thirties.” See Mutual Life Assurance of Canada, A Century of Mutuality (Waterloo, 1970), 65.Google Scholar

35 Financial Times, quoted in PPMC, 13 Dec. 1928, 1785; Macleans, 15 Oct. 1928.

36 Canadian practices with respect to treatment of common stock closely paralleled those in the United States where the use of arbitrarily low par values emerged after 1918. See Graham, Benjamin and Dodd, David L., Security Analysis, 2nd ed. (New York, 1940), 379.Google Scholar

37 Dominion Bureau of Statistics, Historical Summaries of Consolidations in Canadian Industries (Ottawa, 1934).Google Scholar

38 Forsey, “The Pulp and Paper Industry,” 503–6. Guthrie, The Newsprint Paper Industry, ch.5.

39 MCLA, 81.23.161, In the Matter of Abitibi Power and Paper Company, Limited, Compilation of Statements and Information Obtained by the Bondholders Representative Committee, Dated Toronto, Ontario, 21 July 1937 [hereafter CSI], Exhibit A-1.

40 Sobel, Robert, The Great Bull Market: Wall Street in the 1920s (New York, 1968), 88–95.Google Scholar

41 Armstrong, Blue Skies and Boiler Rooms, 28–32. For the best summary of the Canadian treatment of disclosure, see Weganast, Frank, The Law of Canadian Companies (Toronto, 1930), chs. 26 and 29–30.Google Scholar

42 Quoted in Saywell, John T., “F. H. Deacon and Co., Investment Dealers: A Case Study of the Securities Industry, 1897–1945,” Ontario History 85 (1993): 175.Google Scholar

43 Re London and General Bank, Law Times, 106 (1912), 285.

44 Spackman v.Evans, [1868] L.R., 3 H.L. 171, 193; 37 L.J. ch. 752.

45 Re Kingston Cotton Mills Co., [1896] 2 ch. 279 at 688; 65 L.J. ch. 673.

46 Re London and General Bank, [1895] 2 ch. 682; 64 L.J. ch. 866. See also Henry Squire (Cash Chemist) Ltd v. Ball, Baker a- Co., [1911] 27 T.L.R. 269 aff d 28 T.L.R. 81, 106 Law Times 197.

47 Re London and General Bank, [1895] 2 ch. 685; 64 L.J. ch. 866.

48 Re Owen Sound Lumber Co., O.L.R, [1917] 28, 424 and D.L.R. [1917] 33, 486. Weganast, The Law of Canadian Companies, 812–3. Mitchell, Victor, Canadian Commercial Corporations (Montreal, 1916), 1139–45.Google Scholar

49 The best presentation of the proprietary theory can be found in Couchman, Charles B., The Balance-Sheet: Its Preparation, Content and Interpretation (New York, 1924).Google Scholar The entity theory was summarized by Paton, William A., Accounting Theory (New York, 1922).Google Scholar Useful reviews can be found in: Chatfield, M., A History of Accounting Thought (Hinsdale, Ill., 1974), 220–5Google Scholar; Previts, Gary J. and Merino, Barbara D., A History of Accounting in America: An Historical Interpretation of the Cultural Significance of Accounting (New York, 1979), 169–180, 220-3.Google Scholar

50 See Finney, Harry A., Consolidated Statements for Holding Companies (New York, 1923)Google Scholar, and Childs, William H., Consolidated Statements: Principles and Procedures (Ithaca, 1949).Google Scholar

51 Walker, Robert G., Consolidated Statements: A History and Analysis (New York, 1978), 77, 353.Google Scholar

52 Kierskowski v. Grand Trunk Railway, [1859] 10 L.C.R., 47; Mitchell, Canadian Commercial Corporations, 1377.

53 See Finney, Consolidated Statements for Holding Companies, chs. 2–3.

54 Smails, Reginald G. H., Accounting Principles (Toronto, 1948), 343.Google Scholar

55 Committee on Accounting Procedure, Accounting Research Bulletin no. 40 (New York, 1950).Google Scholar

56 Journal of Commerce, quoted in PPMC, 4 Jan. 1917, 1.

57 AO, RG3, 06–0–1173, circular letters of Izaak W. Killam, 20 June 1925, 23 Feb. 1926; Duncan Chisholm to Howard Ferguson, 15 April 1926; RG3, 06–0-615, Howard Ferguson to Charles Dix, 1 April 1925.

58 AO, RG22–5800, 1339/21, National Trust v.Mattagami. This summary is based upon the surviving affidavits, financial statements, and orders in the court version of the file.

59 Annual Financial Review (1928), 119. MCLA, 81.23.161, CSI, J-4.

60 MCLA, 81.20.161, CSI, J7-J11, J24.

61 Quoted in Corporation, Mead, In Quiet Ways: George H. Mead, the Man and the Company (Dayton, Ohio, 1970), 111.Google Scholar

62 PPMC, 5 Aug. 1926, 920; 12 Aug. 1926, 940; Proceedings of the Select Standing Committee on Banking, 22 May 1934, 862, 879.

63 Proceedings of the Select Committee, 815–6, 826, 864, 873.

64 Lambert, Richard S. and Pross, Paul, Renewing Nature's Wealth: A Centennial History of the Public Management of Lands, Forests and Wildlife in Ontario, 1763–1967 (Toronto, 1967), 390–423.Google Scholar

65 The key rulings were Ammonia Soda Co. v.Chamberlain, [1918] 1 ch. 266, 286; and Dovey v.Cory, [1902] A.C., 477. The best discussions of the confusion can be found in Mitchell, Canadian Corporations, 670–98; Wegenast, Canadian Companies, 611–7.

66 Pulp and Paper Association of Canada, Newsprint Data (Montreal, 1948), 16–21.Google Scholar

67 Leven, Maurice, Moulton, Harold G., and Warburton, Clark, America's Capacity to Consume (Washington, 1934), 54–6, 93–4, 103–4Google Scholar; Kuznets, Simon, National Income: A Summary of Findings (New York, 1946), 97–106Google Scholar; Galbraith, The Great Crash, 180–4. See also Romasco, Albert U., The Poverty of Abundance: Hoover, the Nation, the Depression (New York, 1965).Google Scholar

68 Globe, 4 June 1931; Financial Post Survey of Corporate Securities (1932), 215; FP, 1 Aug. 1936.

69 FP, 14 July 1934, 2 May 1936, 6 March 1937; Barrons (31 May 1937), 17.

70 AO, RG 22–5800, 2194/31, National Trust v. Great Lakes Paper, first and interim report of receiver, 30 July 1931; 11 Aug. 1931, cross-examination of Frederick MacKelcan, R., 19 Dec. 1935, 5–25; F9, MU 1353, env. 1, circular letter.Google Scholar

71 AO, RG 22–5800, 2194/31, cross-examination of MacKelcan, 2–50; affidavit of F. R. MacKelcan and order, 25 June 1936.

72 AO, RG3, boxes 260, 278, and 299 contain the extensive correspondence about the Great Lakes Paper arrangement and the renegotiations.

73 Boothman, “Night of the Longest Day,” 26–31.

74 Lower, Arthur R. M., Settlement and the Forest Frontier (Toronto, 1936), 127.Google Scholar

75 Ripley, William Z., Main Street and Wall Street (Boston, 1927), 194–207, 222-255Google Scholar; Baskin, Jonathan B. and Miranti, Paul, A History of Corporate Finance (New York, 1997), 197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Soule, George, Prosperity Decade: From Warto Depression, 1917–1929 (New York, 1947), 298–304.Google Scholar

76 Horwitz, Morton J., The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy (New York, 1992), chs. 7 and 8Google Scholar; McCraw, Thomas K., “With the Consent of the Governed: The SEC s Formative Years,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1 (1982): 346–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Nelles, The Politics of Development, 450–61.