Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T16:12:35.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why be Moral in Business? A Rawlsian Approach to Moral Motivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Richard H. Toenjes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article puts forth the thesis that the contractualist account of moral justification affords a powerful reply in business contexts to the question why a business person should put ethics above immediate business interests. A brief survey of traditional theories of business ethics and their approaches to moral motivation is presented. These approaches are criticized. A contractualist conception of ethics in the business world is developed, based on the work of John Rawls and Thomas Scanlon. The desire to justify our choices in terms that others can be reasonably expected to accept, or at least in terms that others cannot reasonably reject, is identified and differentiated from other accounts of motivation. It is this desire that constitutes the core motive to be moral in business on the contractualist conception. Implications of this contractualist conception for the theory and practice of business ethics are then discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 2002 , pp. 57 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchamp, T. L. and Bowie, N. E. 1997. Ethical Theory and Business (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Dunfee, T. W. and Donaldson, T. 1995. “Contractarian Business Ethics: Current Status and Next Steps.” Business Ethics Quarterly. 5, no 2: 173–186.Google Scholar
Duska, R. 1993. “Aristotle: A Pre-Modern Post-Modern? Implications for Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 3, no 3: 227–250.Google Scholar
Gautier, D. 1986. Morals by Agreement. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Hartman, E. M. 1996. Organizational Ethics and the Good Life. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, L. T. 1994. “Why Be Moral? A Different Rationale for Managers.” Business Ethics Quarterly. 4, no. 2: 191–204.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1970. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1982. “Contractualism and Utilitarianism.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, ed. Sen, A. and Williams, B.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–128.Google Scholar
Shaw, W. H. and Barry, V. 2001. Moral Issues in Business (8th ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. 1973. Ethics and Excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. 1994. The New World of Business. Latham, Md.: Littlefield Adams Quality Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Velasquez, M. G. 1992. Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar