Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T19:10:14.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fiduciary Duty, Risk, and Shareholder Desert

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Gordon G. Sollars  and
Sorin A. Tuluca
Gordon G. Sollars
Affiliation:
Fairleigh Dickinson University
Sorin A. Tuluca
Affiliation:
Fairleigh Dickinson University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

A common moral argument is that shareholders have a special status because of risk when considering the duties of corporate management. The privileges of this status usually include the idea that management should adopt the goal of maximizing shareholder wealth. We argue that modern financial theory demonstrates that this argument should be modified by the recognition of a principle of desert, the shareholder desert principle (SDP). Financial theory can usefully circumscribe the duty owed to shareholders and the extent to which risk bearing justifies a claim on corporate value. When combined with the SDP, the result provides management with a guideline for what is owed to shareholders before other stakeholder non-contractual claims may be satisfied. As such, our approach provides management with some guidance through the thicket of competing stakeholder claims.

Keywords

desertfiduciary dutycapital asset pricing modelshareholderstakeholder
Type
Article
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 203 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bauries, Scott R. 2012. “The Education Duty.” Wake Forest Law Review 47: 705–768.Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret M. 2015. “Of Corporations, Courts, Personhood, and Morality.” Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (4): 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatright, John R. 1994. “Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation: or, What's So Special About Shareholders?” Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Wiliam W. 2006. “Bond Covenants and Creditor Protection: Economics and Law, Theory and Practice, Substance and Process.” European Business Organization Law Review 7: 39–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderone, Julia. 2016. “Tesla and SpaceX Aren’t the Only Things Elon Musk Has Invested In.” Business Insider, April 11, 2016. http://www.businessinsider.com/companies-elon-musk-invests-in-2016-4/#1-musks-first-company-was-zip2-corporation-the-webs-first-yellow-pages-in-1995-1.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Max. 1994. “A Risk Based Model of Stakeholder Theory.” Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Toronto.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas, and Preston, Lee E.. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukeminier, Jesse, Johanson, Stanley M., Lindgren, James, and Sitkoff, Robert H.. 2005. Wills, Trusts, and Estates, 7th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H., and Fischel, Daniel R.. 1983. “Voting in Corporate Law.” Journal of Law and Economics 26: 402–6.Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F., and Jensen, Michael C.. 1983. “Agency Problems and Residual Claims.” Journal of Law and Economics 26 (June): 327–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970. Doing & Deserving; Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Irving. (1930) 1977. The Theory of Interest, as Determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest It. Philadelphia: Porcupine Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1994. “The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 409–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1999. “Divergent Stakeholder Theory.” Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 233–236.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth E. 1991. “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis.” Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1): 53–73.Google Scholar
Hasnas, John. 1998. “The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed.” Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (1): 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2006. “Business Ethics Without Stakeholders.” Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4): 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Michael, and Meckling, William. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. The Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, William A., Mark Ramseyer, J., and Bainbridge, Stephen M.. 2006. Business Associations. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Kleinig, John. 1971. “The Concept of Desert.” American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1): 71–78.Google Scholar
Lintner, John. 1965. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 47 (1): 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomasky, Loren E. 1987. Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 2008a. “A Close Read of an Exellent Commnetary on Dodge v. Ford.” Virginia Law & Business Review 3: 177–190.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 2008b. Corporate Governance: Promises Kept, Promises Broken. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, Ian. 1994. “The Morality of the Corporation: An Empirical or Normative Disagreement?” Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcoux, Alexei M. 2003. “A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory.” Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. 1959. Portfolio Selection. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayo, Herbert B. 2006. Basic Investments. Nashville, TN: Thompson/Southwestern.Google Scholar
McLeod, Owen. 2013. “Desert.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/desert/.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald K., Agle, Bradley R., and Wood, Donna J.. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossin, Jan. 1966. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica 34 (4): 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musk, Elon. 2006. “The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (Just Between You and Me).” Tesla, August 22, 2016. https://www.tesla.com/blog/secret-tesla-motors-master-plan-just-between-you-and-me.Google Scholar
Olsaretti, Serena, ed. 2003. Desert and Justice, Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Robert. 2003. “Stakeholder Legitimacy.” Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollin, Robert, Burns, Justine, and Heintz, James. 2004. “Global Apparel Production and Sweatshop Labour: Can Raising Retail Prices Finance Living Wages?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (2): 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Darryl. 2002. “Employing Normative Stakeholder Theory in Developing Countries A Critical Theory Perspective.” Business and Society 41 (2): 166–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, Edward B. 2015. “Corporate Law Doctrine and the Legacy of American Legal Realism.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 163: 2019–2053.Google Scholar
Scarborough, Ryan, and Olderman, Richard. 2015. “Why Does the FDIC Sue Bank Officers? Exploring the boundaries of the Business Judgment Rule in the Wake of the Great Recession.” Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law 20: 368.Google Scholar
Seretakis, Alexandros. 2013. “A Comparative Examination of Private Equity in the United States and Europe: Accounting for the Past and Predicting the Future of European Private Equity.” Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law 18 (3): 613–667.Google Scholar
Shanken, Jay, and Zhou, Guofu. 2007. “Estimating and Testing Beta Pricing Models: Alternative Methods and Their Performance in Simulations.” Journal of Financial Economics 84 (1): 40–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, William F. 1964. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance 19: 425–442.Google Scholar
Sher, George. 1987. Desert. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Clifford W. Jr., and Warner, Jerold B.. 1979. “On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants.” Journal of Financial Economic 7: 117–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jeremy C. 2008. “Needs Exploitation.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11: 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollars, Gordon G. 2002. “The Corporation as Actual Agreement.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (3): 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollars, Gordon G., and Englander, Fred. 2016. “Sweatshops: Economic Analysis and Exploitation as Unfairness.” Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3091-0.Google Scholar
Stout, Lynn A. 2008. “Why We Should Stop Teaching Dodge v. Ford.” Virginia Law & Business Review 3: 163–176.Google Scholar
Thomson, William. 2003. “Axiomatic and Game-Theoretic Analysis of Bankruptcy and Taxation Problems: a Survey.” Mathematical Social Sciences 45 (3): 249–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasco, Julian. 2015. “A Defense of the Corporate Law Duty of Care.” Iowa Journal of Corporation Law 40: 647–703.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1984. “Corporate Governance.” Yale Law Journal 93: 1197–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar