Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-7bjf6 Total loading time: 0.27 Render date: 2021-08-01T12:13:08.921Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Collateral Damage From the Show: Emotional Labor and Unethical Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2017

Michelle C. Hong
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University-Kingsville
Christopher M. Barnes
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Brent A. Scott
Affiliation:
Michigan State University

Abstract:

We extend the behavioral ethics literature to examining emotional labor as an antecedent to unethical behavior. We hypothesize that surface acting is positively associated with unethical behavior. In contrast, we produce competing hypotheses for the relationship between deep acting and unethical behavior. In Study 1, with a field sample of 123 full-time employees, surface acting was positively associated with unethical behavior, and emotional inauthenticity explained some of this relationship. In contrast, deep acting was not associated with unethical behavior. In Study 2, with a field sample of 117 full-time employees, we replicated the effect of surface acting in Study 1 and found a positive relationship between deep acting and unethical behavior via emotional inauthenticity. In Study 3, using a two-wave design, we replicated the results in Study 2 and found perceived fairness strengthens the relationship between surface acting and unethical behavior through emotional inauthenticity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaah, I. P. 1992. Social inclusion as a marketing ethics correlate. Journal of Business Ethics , 11: 599608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. 2009. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology , 94(2): 491500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. 1993. Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review , 18: 88115.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. M., Schaubroeck, J., Huth, M., & Ghumman, S. 2011. Lack of sleep and unethical conduct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 115: 169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsky, A. 2011. Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics , 104(1): 5975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, D. J. 2015. ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior , 2(1): 383407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, D. J., Trougakos, J. P., Weiss, H. M., & Green, S. G. 2006. Episodic processes in emotional labor: Perceptions of affective delivery and regulation strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology , 91: 10531065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. 2012. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis , 20: 351368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. 2002. Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of “people work.” Journal of Vocational Behavior , 60: 1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. 2003. Development and validation of the emotional labour scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 76: 365379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. 2011. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science , 6: 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. J. 2011. Examining the effects of sleep deprivation on workplace deviance: A self-regulatory perspective. Academy of Management Journal , 54: 913934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. 2005. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management , 31: 874900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. 2007. Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology , 92(4): 9931005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Didonato, T. E., & Krueger, J. I. 2010. Interpersonal affirmation and self-authenticity: A test of Rogers’s self-growth hypothesis. Self and Identity , 9: 322336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. 2005. The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 66: 339357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K. H. 2011. The moderating role of cognitive control deficits in the link from emotional dissonance to burnout symptoms and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , 16: 313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulmer, I. S., Barry, B., & Long, D. A. 2009. Lying and smiling: Informational and emotional deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics , 88: 691709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Fischer, D., & Hunt, J. G. 2009. Emotional labor and leadership: A threat to authenticity? Leadership Quarterly , 20: 466482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. 2009. When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 45: 708719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gino, F., Norton, M. E., & Ariely, D. 2010. The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science , 21: 712720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glomb, T. M., & Tews, T. J. 2004. Emotional labor: A conceptualization and scale development. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 64: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L. S., & Grandey, A. A. 2007. Display rules versus display autonomy: Emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and task performance in a call center simulation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , 12: 301318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandey, A. A. 2000. Emotional regulation in the work place: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , 5: 95110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandey, A. A. 2003. When “the show must go on”: Surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Academy of Management Journal , 46: 8696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandey, A. A., Chi, N. W., & Diamond, J. A. 2013. Show me the money! Do financial rewards for performance enhance or undermine the satisfaction from emotional labor? Personnel Psychology , 66: 569612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandey, A. A., & Fisk, G. M. 2004. Display rules and strain in service jobs: What’s fairness got to do with it? In Ganster, D. C. & Perrew, P. (Eds.), Exploring interpersonal dynamics : 265293. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandey, A. A., Fisk, G. M., Mattila, A. S., Jansen, K. J., & Sideman, L. A. 2005. Is “service with a smile” enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 96: 3855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandey, A. A., Fisk, G. M., & Steiner, D. D. 2005. Must “service with a smile” be stressful? The moderating role of personal control for American and French employees. Journal of Applied Psychology , 90: 893904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandey, A. A., Rupp, D., & Brice, W. N. 2015. Emotional labor threatens decent work: A proposal to eradicate emotional display rules. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 36: 770785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J. J. 1998. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74: 224237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groth, M., Hennig-Thurau, T., & Walsh, G. 2009. Customer reactions to emotional labor: The roles of employee acting strategies and customer detection accuracy. Academy of Management Journal , 52: 958974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. 2012. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling (white paper). http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
Hochschild, A. R. 1979. Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology , 85: 551575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling . Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hulsheger, U. R., & Schewe, A. F. 2011. On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , 16: 361389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, R. H. 2012. How do leaders use emotional labor? Journal of Organizational Behavior , 33: 740744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology , 67: 219229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Colquitt, J. A. 2004. Organizational justice and stress: The mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology , 89: 395404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, T. A., Wolf, E. F., & Hurst, C. 2009. Is emotional labor more difficult for some than others? A multilevel, experience-sampling study. Personnel Psychology , 62: 5788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Trevino, L. K. 2010. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology , 95: 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. 2001. Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 36(2): 249277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leavitt, K., Mitchell, T. R., & Peterson, J. 2010. Theory pruning: Strategies to reduce our dense theoretical landscape. Organizational Research Methods , 13: 644667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, R. T., & Brotheridge, C. M. 2011. Words from the heart speak to the heart: A study of deep acting, faking, and hiding among child care workers. Career Development International , 16: 401420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. 1999. A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences , 27: 405416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. 2008. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research , 45: 633644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., & Wax, A. 2012. Moving emotional labor beyond surface and deep acting: A discordance–congruence perspective. Organizational Psychology Review , 2: 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. 1996. The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review , 21(4): 9861010.Google Scholar
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. 2005. A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics , 59(4): 375413.Google Scholar
Phillipp, A., & Schupbach, H. 2010. Longitudinal effects of emotional labour on emotional exhaustion and dedication of teachers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , 15: 494504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2012. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology , 63: 539569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 42(1): 185227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pugh, S. D., Groth, M., & Hennig-Thurau, T. 2011. Willing and able to fake emotions: A closer examination of the link between emotional dissonance and employee well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology , 96: 377390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. 1991. The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics , 10(11): 805817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaubroeck, J. M., Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W., Lord, R. G., Treviño, L. K., & Peng, A. C. 2012. Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal , 55(5): 10531078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, B. A., & Barnes, C. M. 2011. A multilevel investigation of emotional labor, affect, withdrawal, and gender. Academy of Management Journal , 54: 116136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, B. A., Barnes, C. M., & Wagner, D. T. 2012. Chameleonic or consistent? A multilevel investigation of emotional labor variability and self-monitoring. Academy of Management Journal , 55: 905926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P. A., & Stroh, L. K. 2004. Gender differences: Emotional expression and feelings of personal inauthenticity. Journal of Applied Psychology , 89: 715721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. 1972. Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 28(2): 191193.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. 2014. (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology , 65: 635660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 2001. Organizational justice and ethics program “follow-through”: Influences on employees’ harmful and helpful behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly , 11: 651671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkel, S. 1974. Working . New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
VanMaanen, J., & Kunda, G., 1989. Real feelings-emotional expression and organizational culture. Research in Organizational Behavior , 11: 43103.Google Scholar
Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., & Scott, B. A. 2014. Driving it home: How workplace emotional labor harms employee home life. Personnel Psychology , 67: 487516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. 1996. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior , 18: 174.Google Scholar
Welsh, D. T., Ellis, A. P., Christian, M. S., & Mai, K. M. 2014. Building a self-regulatory model of sleep deprivation and deception: The role of caffeine and social influence. Journal of Applied Psychology , 99(6): 12681277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, D. T., Ordonez, L. D., Snyder, D. G., & Christian, M. S. 2015. The slippery slope: How small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions. Journal of Applied Psychology , 100: 144–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. 2008. The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 55(3): 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Collateral Damage From the Show: Emotional Labor and Unethical Behavior
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Collateral Damage From the Show: Emotional Labor and Unethical Behavior
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Collateral Damage From the Show: Emotional Labor and Unethical Behavior
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *