Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:53:33.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pepper D. Culpepper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay highlights productive ways in which scholars have reanimated the concept of structural power to explain puzzles in international and comparative politics. Past comparative scholarship stressed the dependence of the state on holders of capital, but it struggled to reconcile this supposed dependence with the frequent losses of business in political battles. International relation (IR) scholars were attentive to the power of large states, but mainstream IR neglected the ways in which the structure of global capitalism makes large companies international political players in their own right. To promote a unified conversation between international and comparative political economy, structural power is best conceptualized as a set of mutual dependencies between business and the state. A new generation of structural power research is more attentive to how the structure of capitalism creates opportunities for some companies (but not others) vis-à-vis the state, and the ways in which that structure creates leverage for some states (but not others) to play off companies against each other. Future research is likely to put agents – both states and large firms – in the foreground as political actors, rather than showing how the structure of capitalism advantages all business actors in the same way against non-business actors.

Type
Research articles
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 17 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Structural Power and the Study of Business: Guest Editor: Pepper D. Culpepper , October 2015 , pp. 391 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2015 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Article note: This special issue had its origin in a workshop held at the European University Institute in October 2014 and devoted to an exchange of ideas about the role of structural power in contemporary political science. I am grateful to the Europe in the World research area, part of the Global Governance Programme at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the EUI, which provided financial support for the workshop. Philip Rocco has been a great source of editorial advice and intellectual support throughout the process of pulling together this special issue. In this introductory article I have drawn on the scholarship of all the contributors to this issue, though none of them is responsible for the interpretations I have imposed on their ideas. For helpful comments on earlier versions of this article I thank Patrick Emmenegger, Tasha Fairfield, Jacob Hacker, Alan Jacobs, Thomas Paster, Paul Pierson, and Kevin Young.

References

Abdelal, Rawi. 2015. “The Multinational Firm and Geopolitics: Europe, Russian Energy, and Power.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 553–576.Google Scholar
Alfaro, Laura. 2015. “Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Evaluating the Impact of the Argentina Ruling.” Harvard Business Law Review 5 (1): 47–71.Google Scholar
Andrews, David. 1994. “Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Toward a Structural Theory of International Monetary Autonomy.” International Studies Quarterly 38: 193–218.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Stephen. 2012. “The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business.” International Studies Quarterly 56: 661–673.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1980. “Beyond Relative Autonomy: State Managers as Historical Subjects.” The Socialist Register 17: 227–241.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. and Reinke, Raphael. 2014. “Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States.” Politics & Society 42 (4): 427–454.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick. 2015. “The Long Arm of Justice: U.S. Structural Power and International Banking.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015a. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015b. “Structural Power in Comparative Political Economy: Perspectives from Policy Formulation in Latin America.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 411–441.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L. 2015. “Structuring Power: Business and Authority Beyond the Nation-State.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 527–552.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. “Global Markets and National Politics.” International Organization 52 (4): 787–824.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen, and Law, David. 1989. “Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital.” International Studies Quarterly 33 (4): 475–499.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2002. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State.” Politics & Society 30 (2): 277–325.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics. New York, London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 373–406. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric. 2014. The Status Quo Crisis: Global Financial Governance After the 2008 Meltdown. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindmoor, Andrew, and McGeechan, Josh. 2013. “Luck, Systematic Luck and Business Power: Lucky All the Way Down or Trying Hard to Get What It Wants Without Trying?” Political Studies 61 (4): 834–849.Google Scholar
Kirshner, Jonathan. 2014. American Power after the Financial Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Marsh, David. 1983. “Interest Group Activity and Structural Power: Lindblom's Politics and Markets.” West European Politics 6 (2): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2013. Political Bubbles: Financial Crises and the Failure of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miliband, Ralph. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. London, UK: Quartet Bo.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2000. “Room to Move: International Financial Markets and National Welfare States.” International Organization 54 (4): 737–773.Google Scholar
Paster, Thomas. 2015. “Bringing Power Back In: A Review of the Literature on the Role of Business in Welfare State Politics. MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/3.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Wallerstein, Michael. 1988. “Structural Dependence of the State on Capital.” American Political Science Review 82 (1): 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinke, Raphael. 2014. “The Politics of Bank Bailouts.” PhD dissertation, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2000. American Business and Political Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane. 1992. “Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations.” American Political Science Review 86 (1): 38–54.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1987. “Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom.” British Journal of Political Science 17 (4): 385–408.Google Scholar
Winecoff, William Kindred. 2015. “Structural Power and the Global Financial Crisis: A Network Analytical Approach.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 495–525.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A. 1996. Power in Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Kevin. 2012. “Transnational Regulatory Capture?” An Empirical Examination of the Transnational Lobbying of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.” Review of International Political Economy 19 (4): 663–688.Google Scholar
Young, Kevin. 2015. “Not By Structure Alone: Power, Prominence, and Agency in American Finance.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 443–472.Google Scholar