Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:07:21.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Not Just a “Second Order” Problem in a Wider Economic Crisis: Systemic Challenges for the Global Trading System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Richard Higgott
Richard Higgott*
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reform of the multilateral trade regime is not simply a second order problem within a wider economic crisis. The completion of the Doha Round may be a second order question but the global trade regime faces a series of broader systemic challenges beyond the completion of the current negotiations. This paper identifies five challenges: (i) a marked reduction in popular support for open markets in major OECD countries; (ii) the stalling of a transition from one global economic equilibrium to another; (iii) a lack of clarity and agreement on the agenda and objectives for the WTO as we move deeper into the 21st century; (iv) the demand for fairness and justice in the governance of the WTO'the ‘legitimacy’ question and (v) the rise of regional preferentialism as a challenge to multilateralism. Failure to address these challenges will represent not only a fundamental question for the future of the WTO as the guarantor of the norms and rules of the global trade regime specifically, but also the ability to establish greater coherence in global economic governance overall when its need is arguably greater than at any time since the depression years of the 20th century inter-war period.

Keywords

multilateralismtrade policyWTOpreferentialismgovernance
Type
Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , October 2009 , pp. 1 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2009 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albin, Cecilia. 2008. ‘Using Negotiation to Promote Legitimacy: An Assessment of Proposals for Reforming the WTO’. International Affairs 84 (4): 757–775.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 2006. ‘Mulilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade’. The World Economy 29 (11): 1451–1518.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, Evenett, Simon and Low, Patrick. 2007. ‘Beyond Tariffs: Multilaterising Deeper RTA Commitments’. Multilateralizing Regionalism, Geneva, 10–12 September 2007, at http://www.wto.org/english/tratope/regione/consep07e/Baldwin_evenett_low_e.pdf Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Evenett, Simon. eds. 2009. The collapse of global trade, murky protectionism, and the crisis: Recommendations for the G2. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Basu, Praesenjit et al. 2005. India as a New Global Leader, London: The Foreign Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish and Kreuger, Ann. 1995. The Dangerous Drift to Preferential Trade Agreements. Washington DC: The American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1998. Protectionism. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2004. In Defence of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blinder, Leonard. 2007. ‘How Many US Jobs Might Be Offshoreable?’ Brussels: CEPS Working Paper 142.Google Scholar
Breslin, Shaun. 2007. China and the Global Political Economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Capling, Anne. 2005. All the way with the US: Australia, United States and Free Trade. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Desker, Barry. 2004 ‘In Defence of PTAs: From Purity to Pragmatism in Southeast Asia’. The Pacific Review 17 (1): 3–26.Google Scholar
Dieter, Heribert and Higgott, Richard. 2003. ‘Exploring Alternative Theories of Economic Regionalism: From Trade to Finance in Asian Co-operation’. Review of International Political Economy 10 (3): 430–54.Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon. 2008. ‘Getting Over Those Doha Blues’, Geneva. The Graduate Institute. VoxEU.Org Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon. 2009. ‘No turning back: lock in 20 years of reform at the WTO’. In What World Leaders Must Do to Halt the Spread of Protectionism, edited by Baldwin, Richard and Evenett, Simon. Geneva: The Graduate Institute. A VoxEU.Org.Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon. 2009. ‘Aid for Trade and the “Missing Middle” of the World Trade Organisation’. Global Governance 15 (3): 359–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Peter and Stoler, A. 2009. ‘Critical Mass as an Alternative Framework for Multilateral Trade Negotiations’. Global Governance 15 (3): 375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard. 2005. ‘Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment’. Journal of International Economic Law 8 (2): 405–24Google Scholar
Higgott, Richard and Erman, Eva. 2009. ‘Deliberative Global Governance and the Question for Legitimacy: What Can We Learn from the WTO?’ Review of International Studies. forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John G., 2000. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Rewstraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., 2005. ‘The Contingent Legitimacy of Multilateralism’ Working Paper No. 9. Warwick University: EU FP6 Network of Excellence on Global Governance, Regionalisation and Regulation: The Role of the EU (GARNET) at www.garnet-eu.org Google Scholar
Lamy, Pascal. 2009. The Role of the Multilateral trade System in the Current Economic Crisis, Public Lecture. University of Warwick, July 15, 2009: 1–13.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Robert, Z. (n.d) ‘China and the Multilateral Trading System’, http://ksghome.harvard.edu/∼RLawrence/Lawrence%20China%20and%20the%20Multilateral%20Trading%20System.pdf.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Amrita. 2005. A Short History of the WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Amrita and Tussie, Diana. 2004. ‘The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial Meeting: Developing Countries and their Evolving Coalitions’. The World Economy 27 (7): 947–66.Google Scholar
Panagriya, Arvind. 2008. India: The Emerging Giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pomfret, Richard. 1997. Unequal Trade: The Economics of Regional Trading Arrangements. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Rothkopf, David. 2008. The Global Power Elite and the World they are Making. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul. 2004. ‘Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization’. Journal of Economic Perspective 18 (3) 2004: 135–146.Google Scholar
Schiller, Robert. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Robert. 2008. The Subprime Solution: How Today's Global Financial Crisis Happened and What to Do About It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert. M. and Deardoff, Alan. 2006. ‘Globalization's bystanders: Does trade liberalization hurt countries that do not participate?. World Development 34 (8): 1419–1429.Google Scholar
Stone, Diane. ed. 2001. Banking on Knowledge: The Genesis of the Global Development Network. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stone, Diane. ed. 2006. The World Bank and Governance: A Decade of Reform and Reaction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tussie, Diana. 2009. ‘Process DriveSrs in Trade Negotiations: The Role of Research in the Path to Grounding and Contextualising’. Global Governance 15 (3): 335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission, Warwick. 2007. The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward? University of Warwick, http://go.warwick.ac.uk/go/warwickcommission Google Scholar
Wolf, Martin. 2004. Why Globalization Works. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
WTO. 2007. Annual Report. Geneva. World Trade Organization.Google Scholar