Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T09:21:30.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Of similes and metaphors in Buddhist philosophical literature: poetic semblance through mythic allusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2010

Ulrich Timme Kragh
Ulrich Timme Kragh*
Affiliation:
Geumgang University, Korea
*
utkragh@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is a common supposition that to understand a philosophical writing, knowledge of the philosophical sources on which it draws suffices. Yet, abstract subtleties are often suitably dressed in poetic comparisons, whose threads are spun from a different source. While the body of logical argument appeals to the intellect, the dress of literary tropes allures the emotions. Philosophy is not simply mathematics, for it involves a sentiment, which in Mahāyāna Buddhism means susceptibility to its religious ethos embodied in its path, bodhicitta, and bodhisattvas. Through Candrakīrti's comparison of buddhas and bodhisattvas to the king of geese, I shall here examine the use of similes and metaphors in Indian Buddhist philosophical writing. The analysis illustrates the subtle influence that popular narratives eulogizing the deeds of saints had on such texts, and proposes to revisit philosophical texts as literary works.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , October 2010 , pp. 479 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bajdai, K. D. 1967. The Geographical Encyclopaedia of Ancient and Medieval India based on Vedic, Puranic, Tantric, Jain, Buddhist Literature and Historical Records. Varanasi.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Anukul Chandra. 1939. Kāvyādarśa – Tibetan and Sanskrit. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
Böhtlingk, O. 1890. Poetik (Kāvjādarça): Sanskrit und Deutsch. Leipzig: H. Haessel.Google Scholar
btsan lha ngag dbang tshul khrims. 1997. brda dkrol gser gyi me long. Beijing: mi rigs dpe skrun khang.Google Scholar
van Buitenen, J. A. B. 1973. The Mahābhārata: Book 1, The Book of the Beginning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Robert. 1895. The Jātaka or Stories of the Buddha's Former Births. Vol. I, reprint 1973. London: The Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
Chavannes, Édouard. 1911. Cinq cents contes et apologues extraits du Tripiṭaka chinois. Paris: Société Asiatique.Google Scholar
Dave, K. N. 1985. Birds in Sanskrit Literature. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Devadhar, C. R. 1984. Works of Kālidāsa. Volume 2 Poetry. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Doniger, Wendy. 1998. “Rings of rejection and recognition in ancient India”, Journal of Indian Philosophy 26, 435–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, Franklin. 1953. Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary. Vol. I–II. Reprint 1998. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1944. “The Sinduvāra tree [and the Śephālikā] in Sanskrit literature”, University of California Publications in Classical Philology, 12, 333–46. Reprinted 1988. Sanskrit Studies of M.B. Emeneau: Selected Papers. edited by B. A. van Nooten. Berkeley: University of California, 1–10.Google Scholar
Fausbøll, V. 1877. The Jātaka Together with Its Commentary Being Tales of the Anterior Births of Gotama Buddha. Vol. I. Reprint 1962. London: The Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
Fausbøll, V. 1887. The Jātaka Together with Its Commentary Being Tales of the Anterior Births of Gotama Buddha. Vol. IV. Reprint 1963. London: The Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
Fausbøll, V. 1891. The Jātaka Together with Its Commentary Being Tales of the Anterior Births of Gotama Buddha. Vol. V. Reprint 1963. London: The Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
Francis, H. T. 1895a. The Jātaka or Stories of the Buddha's Former Births. Vol. IV. Reprint 1973. London: The Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
Francis, H. T. 1895b. The Jātaka or Stories of the Buddha's Former Births. Vol. V. Reprint 1973. London: The Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
Fenner, Peter. 1990. The Ontology of the Middle Way. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gajendragadkar, A. B. and Pralayankar, Pravin. 2004. Kālidāsaviracitam abhijñānaśākuntalam: The Abhijñāna-Śākuntalam of Kālidāsa. Delhi: New Bharatiya Book Corporation.Google Scholar
Gonda, J. 1949. Remarks on Similes in Sanskrit Literature, Orientalia Rheno-Traiectina, vol. 1, edited by Gonda, J. and Obbink, H. W.. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Leslie. 1990. A Concordance of Buddhist Birth Stories. Oxford: Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
Hahn, Michael. 1992. Haribhaṭṭa and Gopadatta: Two Authors in the Succession of Āryaśūra, On the Rediscovery of Parts of Their Jātakamālās. Second edition. (Studia Philologica Buddhica Occasional Paper Series vol. 1.) Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Hirakawa, Akira et al. 1978. Index to the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya (Peking Edition): Part Three (Tibetan–Sanskrit). Tokyo: Daizō Shuppan.Google Scholar
Hultsch, E. 1911. Kālidāsa's Meghadūta. Reprint 1998. New Delhi: Munshiram manoharlal.Google Scholar
Huntington, C. W. Jr. 1989. The Emptiness of Emptiness: An Introduction to Early Indian Mādhyamika. Reprint 1992. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, Ganganatha. 2005. Kāvyaprakāsha of Mammata with English Translation. Delhi: Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. J. 2001. Kālidāsa: The Recognition of Śakuntalā. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de, Jong, J., W. 1978. “Textcritical notes on the Prasannapadā”, Indo-Iranian Journal 20, 217–52.Google Scholar
Karmarkar, R. D. 2001. Meghadūta of Kālidāsa. Delhi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan.Google Scholar
Kern, Hendrik. 1891. The Jātaka-Mālā or Bodhisattvāvadāna-mālā by Ārya-çūra. Boston: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Kragh, Ulrich Timme. 2006. Early Buddhist Theories of Action and Result: A Study of Karmaphalasambandha, Candrakīrti's Prasannapadā, Verses 17.1–20. (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde.) Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
van, der Kuijp, Leonard, W. J. 1993. “Jayānanda: a twelfth century Guoshi from Kashmir among the Tangut”, Central Asiatic Journal 37/3–4, 188–97.Google Scholar
de, LaVallée, Poussin, Louis, . 1903–1913. Mūlamadhyamikakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna avec la Prasannapadā Commentaire de Candrakīrti. Reprint 1970. Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag.Google Scholar
de, LaVallée, Poussin, Louis, . 1907–1912. Madhyamakāvatāra par Candrakīrti: traduction tibétaine. Reprint 1992. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Lalye, P. G. 2002. Mallinātha. (Makers of Indian Literature.) New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.Google Scholar
Lang, Karen C. 1986. Āryadeva's Catuḥśataka on the Bodhisattva's Cultivation of Merit and Knowledge. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Leslie, Julia. 1998. “A bird bereaved: the identity and significance of Vālmīki's Krauñca”, Journal of Indian Philosophy 26/5, 455–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Jacques. 1959. Candrakīrti: Prasannapadā Madhyamakav tti (Commentaire limpide au Traité du Milieu). Paris: Librairie d'Amérique et d'Orient. Second print 1959. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
McCrea, Lawrence. 1998. “The teleology of poetics in medieval Kashmir”, PhD dissertation. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Ichijō, 1977. Kūshō shisō no kenkyū – Nyūchū ron no kaidoku (空性思想の研究－入中論の解読) [A Study of Śūnyatā Thought: Madhyamakāvatāra – Annotated Translation]. Kyoto: Bun Eidō Shoten.Google Scholar
Radice, William. 2005. “Julia Leslie: a life in South Asian studies”, South Asia Research 25/2, 123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sakyapa Student's Union. 1995. dbu ma la ’jug pa'i rnam bshad de kho na nyid gsal ba'i sgron ma zhes bya ba bzhugs so. Varanasi: dpal sa skya'i slob gnyer lhan tshogs kyi tshogs.Google Scholar
Scherrer-Schaub, Cristina Anna. 1991. Yuktiṣaṣṭikāv tti: Commentaire à la soixantaine sur le raisonnement ou du vrai enseignement de la causalité par le Maître indien Candrakīrti. (Mélanges Chinois et Bouddhiques vol. 25.) Brussels: Institut Belge des Hautes Études Chinoises.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Richard. 1907. Appayyadīkṣita's Kuvalayānandakārikās. Berlin: Veral von H. Barsdorf.Google Scholar
Schwartberg, Joseph E. with the collaboration of Shiva G. Bajpai. 1992. A Historical Atlas of South Asia. Second impression. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shāstrī, Haraprasad. 1914. Catuḥśatikā by Ārya Deva. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Shivaramaiah, B. K. 1993. Kālidāsa's Śākuntala – A Study. Mysore: Ramya Publishers.Google Scholar
Sonam, Ruth. 1994. Yogic Deeds of Bodhisattvas: Gyel-tsap on Āryadeva's Four Hundred. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
Speyer, J. S. 1895. The Gātakamālā or Garland of Birth-Stories translated from Sanskrit. Reprint Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Stcherbatsky, Th. 1927. The Conception of Buddhist Nirvāṇa. Reprint 1999. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Daisetz T. et al. 1955–1961. The Tibetan Tripitaka: Peking Edition. Kyoto: Suzuki Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Takakusu, J. 1896. A Record of the Buddhist Religion as Practised in India and the Malay Archipelago (A.D. 671–695). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 1989. “The reader as author: collaborative interpolation in Latin poetry”, in John, M. Grant (ed.), Editing Greek and Latin Texts: Papers Given at the Twenty-Third Annual Conference on Editorial Problems. New York: Ams Press.Google Scholar
Tauscher, Helmut. 1981. Candrakīrti: Madhyamakāvatāraḥ und Madhyamakāvatārabhāṣyam (Kapitel VI, Vers 166–226). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Tauscher, Helmut. 1989. Verse-Index of Candrakīrti's Madhyamakāvatāra (Tibetan Versions). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Thieme, Paul. 1975. Kranich und Reiher im Sanskrit. (Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik, 1.) Reinbek: Albrecht und Inge Wezler Verlag.Google Scholar
Tillemans, Tom J. F. 1990. Materials for the Study of Āryadeva, Dharmapāla and Candrakīrti. (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde.) Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Vasudevaśarmā, . 1903. Śrīmadappayyadīkṣitapraṇītaḥ Kuvalayānandaḥ. Bombay.Google Scholar
Vogel, Jean Philippe. 1962. The Goose in Indian Literature and Art. (Memoirs of the Kern Institute no. 2.) Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winternitz, Morriz. 1920. Geschichte der indischen Literatur. Reprint 1968. Stuttgart: K. F. Koehler Verlag.Google Scholar
Zhāng, Yísūn et al. 1984. bod rgya tshig mdzod chen mo. Reprint 1993. Beijing: mi rigs dpe skrun khang.Google Scholar