Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T14:46:27.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coptic Texts in the University of Michigan Collection Edited by William H. Worrell Collaborators: Elinor M. Husselman, Louise A. Shier, Herbert C. Youtie, Orsamus M. Pearl, Werner Vycichl. With a Study in the Popular Traditions of Coptic, by William H. Worrell. pp. xiv + 376. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. London: Humphrey Milford. 1942. 11 pls. $5.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Battiscombe Gunn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews of Books
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1947 , pp. 262 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 263 note 1 It is a surprise to find on p. 217 a distinction made between ostraca (i.e. here potsherds) and fragments of limestone. This is against the usage of Egyptologists and also that of Crum (e.g. Coptic Ostraca, pp. x, xi), all of whom employ the word ostraea for both materials.

page 265 note 1 The position of sene in No. 62 is against its being the status constrnctus of an imperative.