Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T17:12:25.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barlow Trecothick

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2011

Get access

Extract

American colonists who clung to the British standard when the final break with the mother country came have long been christened Loyalists, and have been extensively studied. Protagonists of the colonies in the mother country, however, have been comparatively neglected, and there were a considerable number of these individuals. Although mainly of secondary importance, there were a number of merchants and others whose sympathies, for various reasons, lay with the American colonies, and who worked on behalf of the colonial interest in this country often as close associates with the Rockingham Whigs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for American Studies 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.The classic work on the Loyalists is The Loyalists of the American Revolution by Sabine, L., Boston, 1864. For other works see the bibliography to my Barlow Trecothick and other Associates of Lord Rockingham during the Stamp Act Crisis 1765–1766. (Unpublished thesis in Sheffield University Library, 1958).Google Scholar
2.See my Barlow TrecothickGoogle Scholar
3.See my Barlow Trecothick, pp. 20–74.Google Scholar
4.See Trecothick's evidence before the Stamp Act Committee in Wentworth Woodhouse Muniments, Sheffield City Library, Rockingham Papers, R. 27, p. 21Google Scholar
5.See Trecothick's evidence before the Stamp Act Committee in Wentworth Woodhouse Muniments, Sheffield City Library, Rockingham Papers, R. 27, p. 21.Google Scholar
6.See The Ingersoll Papers, Papers of the New Haven Colony Historical Society Vol. IX, New Haven, 1918, p. 332.Google Scholar
7.See The House of Hancock by Baxter, W. T., Cambridge, Mass. 1945, p. 81 et passim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Notes and Queries 11th Series, Vol. IV p. 11, London, 1930.Google Scholar
9.See my Barlow Trecothick pp. 75–99.Google Scholar
10.See below.Google Scholar
11.Rockingham Papers R. 27, p. 21Google Scholar
12.England in the Age of the American Revolution by Namier, L.B. London, 1930 p. 289.Google Scholar
13.For a fuller account of this see my Barlow Trecothick pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
14.See British Museum Add.Mss. 36218 f. 151 for the case of Trecothick v. Wentworth also Acts of the Privy Council (Colonial Series), Vol. IV, p. 393.Google Scholar
15.See my Barlow Trecothick, p. 25.Google Scholar
16.See The Aldermer of the City of London by Beavan, A., London, 19081913, Vol. 1, p. 142 et passim.Google Scholar
17.See The Ingersoll Papers p. 331, Jared Ingersoll's letter to Connecticut Gazette, 13 September, 1765.Google Scholar
18.See The Ingersoll Papers p. 331. See also my Barlow Trecothick, p. 27.Google Scholar
19.See “Public Record Office” Treasury Papers, T/1 Bundle 439 f26. Bundle 440 f63, 65.Google Scholar
20.Ingersoll Papers, p. 332.Google Scholar
21.See The Committee of the Whole House to Consider the American Papers by Smith, B. R.. (Unpublished thesis in Sheffield University Library. 1965), pp. 269–70.Google Scholar
22.See “Benjamin Franklin and the Stamp Act” by Crane, V.W. in Proceedings of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts Vol. XXXII, Boston, 1937. p. 60.Google Scholar
23.For this incident see my Barlow Trecothick, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
24.For this incident see my Barlow Trecothick, p. 32.Google Scholar
25.R. 24: Trecothick to Rockingham, 7 November, 1765.Google Scholar
26.The time lag was Trecothick's calculation based on the time it would take to get any measure through Parliament and the time it would take for a ship to carry the news to America.Google Scholar
27.R. 81–181: Rockingham to Trecothick, undated.Google Scholar
28.See my Barlow Trecothick, p. 34.Google Scholar
29.New Hampshire Provincial Papers, Vol. VII, 1764–66, ed. by Boulton, N.. Nashua, 1873, p. 592.Google Scholar
30.See my Barlow Trecothick p. 35.Google Scholar
31.R. 1–309: “Copy of a letter to Leeds from Mr. Trecothick relating to the American trade.”Google Scholar
32.R. 1–309. For a fuller account of this see my Barlow Trecothick, p. 35 et seq.Google Scholar
33.R. 1.–310.Google Scholar
34.Crane, loc. cit., p. 68.Google Scholar
35.British Opinion and the American Revolution by Clark, Dora M.. Yale Historical Publications, 1930, p. 41.Google Scholar
36.See my Barlow Trecothick, pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
37.See my Barlow Trecothick, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar