Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T09:53:16.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantum logic as an implication algebra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

P.D. Finch
Affiliation:
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For the purpose of this paper a logic is defined to be a non-empty set of propositions which is partially ordered by a relation of logical implication, denoted by “≤”, and which, as a poset, is orthocomplemented by a unary operation of negation. The negation of the proposition x is denoted by NX and the least element in the logic is denoted by 0, we write NO = 1.

A binary operation “→” is introduced into a logic, the operation is interpreted as material implication so that “x → y” is a proposition of the logic and is read as “x materially implies y”. If material implication has the properties

11. (x → 0) = NX, 12. if xy then (zx) ≤ (zy), 13. if xy then x ≤ (yz)= xz, 14. x ≤ {yN(yNx)}, then the logic is an orthomodular lattice. The lattice operations of join and meet are given by xy = NxN(NxNy) xy = N(XN(xy)) and, in terms of the lattice operations, the material implication is given by (xy) = (yx) ∨ NX.

Moreover the logic is a Boolean algebra if, and only if, in addition to the properties above, material implication satifies 15. (xy) = (NyNx).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1970

References

[1]Abbot, J.C. and Kleindorfer, P.R., “A new characterisation of Boolean algebras”, Amer. Math. Monthly 68 (1961), 697698.Google Scholar
[2]Birkhoff, Garrett, Lattice theory (Colloquium Publ. 25, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 3rd ed., 1967).Google Scholar
[3]Finch, P.D., “On the structure of quantum logic”, J. Symbolic Logic 34 (1969), 275282.Google Scholar
[4]Finch, P.D., “Sasaki projections on orthocomplemented posets”, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 1 (1969), 319324.Google Scholar
[5]Finch, P.D., “On the lattice structure of quantum logic”, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 1 (1969), 333340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar