Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T15:52:34.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Harmonic characteristic vector fields on contact metric three-manifolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Domenico Perrone
Domenico Perrone
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica, Universitá degli Studi di Lecce, Via Provinciale Lecce-Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italy e-mail: demenico.perrone@unile.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we show that a contact metric three-manifold is a generalised (k, μ)-space on an everywhere dense open subset if and only if its characteristic vector field ξ determines a harmonic map from the manifold into its unit tangent sphere bundle equipped with the Sasaki metric. Moreover, we classify the contact metric three-manifolds whose characteristic vector field ξ is strongly normal (or equivalently, is harmonic and minimal).

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 305 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

[1]Blair, D.E., Riemannian geometry of contact and sympletic manifold, Progress in Math. 203 (Birkhäuser, Boston, Basel, Berlin, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Blair, D.E., Koufogiorgos, T. and Papantoniou, B.J., ‘Contact metric manifolds satisfying a nullity condition’, Israel J. Math. 91 (1995), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Calvaruso, G., Perrone, D. and Vanhecke, L., ‘Homogeneity on three-dimensional contact metric manifolds’, Israel J. Math. 114 (1999), 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Chern, S.S. and Hamilton, R.S., On Riemannian metrics adapted to three-dimensional contact manifolds, Lecture Notes in Math. 1111 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
[5]Geiges, H., ‘Normal contact structure on 3-manifolds’, Tôhoku Math. J. 49 (1997), 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Gil-Medrano, O., ‘Relationship between volume and energy of unit vector fields’, Differential Geom. Appl. 15 (2001), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]González-Dávila, J.C. and Vanhecke, L., ‘Examples of minimal unit vector fields’, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 18 (2000), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]González-Dávila, J.C. and Vanhecke, L., ‘Minimal and harmonic characteristic vector fields on three-dimensional contact metric manifolds’, J. Geom. 72 (2001), 65–76.Google Scholar
[9]Han, S.D. and Yim, J.W., ‘Unit vector fields on spheres which are harmonic maps’, Math. Z. 227 (1998), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Koufogiorgos, T. and Tsichlias, C., ‘On the existence of a new class of contact metric manifolds’, Canad. Math. Bull. 43 (2000), 440–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Milnor, J., ‘Curvature of left invariant metrics on Lie groups’, Adv. Math. 21 (1976), 293–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Perrone, D., ‘Contact Riemannian manifolds satisfying R (X, ξ)R=0’, Yokohama Math. J. 39 (1992), 141–149.Google Scholar
[13]Perrone, D., ‘Ricci tensor and spectral rigidity of contact Riemannian three-manifolds’, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica 24 (1996), 127–138.Google Scholar
[14]Perrone, D., ‘Homegeneous contact Riemannian three-manifolds’, Illinois Math. J. 42 (1998), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Perrone, D., ‘Contact metric manifolds whose characteristic vector field is a harmonic vector field’, (in preparation).Google Scholar
[16]Tricerri, F. and Vanhecke, L., Homogeneous structures on Riemannian manifolds, London Math. Soc. Lect. Note Series 83 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Wiegmink, G., ‘Total bending of vector fields on Riemannian manifolds’, Math. Ann. 303 (1995), 325–344.Google Scholar
[18]Wood, C.M., ‘On the energy of a unit vector field’, Geom. Dedicata 64 (1997), 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar