Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T00:09:21.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tendency for upwind movement in the sibling fruit fly species, Bactrocera tryoni and B. neohumeralis and their hybrids (Diptera: Tephritidae): influence of time of day, sex and airborne pheromone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

N. Pike  and
A. Meats
N. Pike*
Affiliation:
Fruit Fly Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
A. Meats
Affiliation:
Fruit Fly Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
*
*Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France Fax: + 33 1 44 32 38 85 E-mail: Nathan.Pike.1998@pem.cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communication
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 173 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, M. & Prokopy, R.J. (1992) Host search behaviour by Rhagoletis pomonella flies: inter-tree movement patterns in response to wind-borne fruit volatiles under field conditions. Physiological Entomology 14, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Browne L. (1957) The effect of light on the mating behaviour of the Queensland fruit fly Strumeta tryoni (Frogg.). Australian Journal of Zoology 5, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, M.A. (1967) Adaptations to temperature in geographic races of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus (Strumeta) tryoni. Australian Journal of Zoology 15, 1141–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellas, T.E. & Fletcher, B.S. (1979) Identification of the major components in the secretion from the rectal pheromone glands of the Queensland fruit flies Dacus tryoni and Dacus neohumeralis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 5, 795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J., Gibson, G. & Packer, M.J. (1989) Odour movement, wind direction, and the problem of host-finding by tsetse flies. Physiological Entomology 14, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. (1989) The tropical fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae; Dacinae) of the Australasian and Oceanian regions. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 26, 1–521.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (1981) Responses by female Dacinae to 'male' lures and their relationship to patterns of mating behaviour and pheromone response. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 29, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, B.S. (1968) Storage and release of a sex pheromone by the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni (Diptera: Trypetidae). Nature 219, 631–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, B.S. (1969) The structure and function of the sex pheromone glands of the male Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni. Journal of Insect Physiology 15, 1309–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, B.S. (1987) The biology of dacine fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 32, 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, B.S. (1989) Chapter 8.1. Life history strategies of tephritid fruit flies. In Fruit flies: their biology, natural enemies and control. pp 195–208. [Robinson, A.S. and Hooper, G., editors]. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fletcher, B.S. & Giannakakis, A. (1973) Factors limiting the response of females of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni, to the sex pheromone of the male. Journal of Insect Physiology 19, 1147–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.H. (1969) Effect of daily synchronisation of sexual activity and mating success in laboratory populations of two species of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 17, 619–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakakis, A. & Fletcher, B.S. (1978) An improved bioassay technique for the sex pheromone of male Dacus tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae). Canadian Entomologist 110, 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, G.W. (1968) The frequency of interbreeding between two sibling species of Dacus (Diptera) in wild populations. Evolution 22, 667–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, N., Paynter, Q. & Brady, J. (1995) Rates of progress up odour plumes by tsetse flies: a mark release video study of the timing of odour source location by Glossina pallidipes. Physiological Entomology 20, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, O.T., Lomer, R.A. & Howse, P.E. (1981) Responses of male Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata, to trimedlure in a wind tunnel of novel design. Physiological Entomology 6, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuba, H. & Koyama, J. (1985) Mating behavior of wild melon flies, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a field cage: courtship behavior. Applied Entomology and Zoology 20, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuba, H. & Sokei, Y. (1988) The production of pheromone clouds by spraying in the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Ethology 6, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, P.J., Heath, R.R. & King, J.R. (1985) Behavioral responses of female papaya fruit flies, Toxotrypana curvicauda (Diptera: Tephritidae), to male-produced sex pheromone. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78, 751–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meats, A. & Hartland, C.L. (1999) Upwind anemotaxis in response to cue-lure by the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni. Physiological Entomology 24, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meats, A. & Osborne, A. (2000) Dose-related upwind anemotaxis and movement up odour gradients in still air by the wild tobacco fly, Bactrocera cacuminata. Physiological Entomology 25, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monro, J. (1953) Stridulation in the Queensland fruit fly Dacus (Strumeta) tryoni Frogg. Australian Journal of Science 16, 60–62.Google Scholar
Murlis, J., Willis, M.A. & Cardé, R.T. (2000) Spatial and temporal structure of pheromone plumes in fields and forests. Physiological Entomology 25, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.H. (1979) Genetic manipulation of the circadian clock's timing of sexual behaviour in the Queensland fruit flies, Dacus tryoni and Dacus neohumeralis. Physiological Entomology 4, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tychsen, P.H. (1977) Mating behaviour of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae), in field cages. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 16, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tychsen, P.H. & Fletcher, B.S. (1971) Studies on the rhythm of mating in the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni. Journal of Insect Physiology 17, 2139–2156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolda, H. (1967) Reproductive isolation between two closely related species of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni (Frogg.) and D. neohumeralis Hardy (Diptera: Tephritidae). II. Genetic variation in humeral callus pattern in each species as compared with laboratory-bred hybrids. Australian Journal of Zoology 15, 515–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar