Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:31:18.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predation risk effects on larval development and adult life of Aedes aegypti mosquito

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2022

G. D. Cozzer Open the ORCID record for G. D. Cozzer [Opens in a new window] ,
R. de S. Rezende Open the ORCID record for R. de S. Rezende [Opens in a new window] ,
T. S. Lara ,
G. H. Machado ,
J. Dal Magro Open the ORCID record for J. Dal Magro [Opens in a new window]  and
D. Albeny-Simões Open the ORCID record for D. Albeny-Simões [Opens in a new window]
G. D. Cozzer*
Affiliation:
Community University of the Chapecó Region – Postgraduate Program in Environmental Sciences – Laboratory of Ecological Entomology, Chapecó, SC, Brazil
R. de S. Rezende
Affiliation:
Community University of the Chapecó Region – Postgraduate Program in Environmental Sciences – Laboratory of Ecological Entomology, Chapecó, SC, Brazil
T. S. Lara
Affiliation:
Community University of the Chapecó Region – Veterinary Medicine, Chapecó, SC, Brazil
G. H. Machado
Affiliation:
Community University of the Chapecó Region – Veterinary Medicine, Chapecó, SC, Brazil
J. Dal Magro
Affiliation:
Community University of the Chapecó Region – Postgraduate Program in Environmental Sciences – Laboratory of Ecological Entomology, Chapecó, SC, Brazil
D. Albeny-Simões
Affiliation:
BioVectors Vector Control Solutions, Chapecó, SC, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: G. D. Cozzer, Email: pinocozzer.ps@unochapeco.edu.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biological control is one of the methods available for control of Aedes aegypti populations. We used experimental microcosms to evaluate the effects of actual predation and predation risk by dragonfly larvae (Odonata) on larval development, adult longevity, and adult size of Ae. aegypti. We used six treatments: control, removal, variable density cues (Cues VD), fixed density cues (Cues FD), variable density predator (Predator VD), and fixed density predator (Predator FD) (n = 5 each). Predator treatments received one dragonfly larva. Cue treatments were composed of crushed Ae. aegypti larvae released into the microcosm. For the FD treatments, we maintained a larval density of 200 individuals. The average mortality of Ae. aegypti larvae in the Predator VD treatment was used as the standard mortality for the other treatments. Mosquitoes from the Predator VD and Cues VD treatments developed faster, and adults were larger and had greater longevity compared to all other treatments, likely due to the higher food availability from larval density reduction. High larval density negatively affected larval developmental time, adult size, and longevity. Males were less sensitive to density-dependent effects. Results from this study suggest that the presence of predators may lead to the emergence of adult mosquitoes with greater fitness, causing an overall positive effect on Ae. aegypti population growth rates.

Keywords

Denguelife historyOdonatapredator–prey interactionvector ecology
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 29 - 36
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, PA (2009) When does greater mortality increase population size? The long history and diverse mechanisms underlying the hydra effect. Ecology Letters 12, 462–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, PA and Matsuda, H (2005) The effect of adaptive change in the prey on the dynamics of an exploited predator population. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62, 758–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akram, W and Ali-Khan, HA (2016) Odonate nymphs: generalist predators and their potential in the management of dengue mosquito, Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases 10, 253–258.Google ScholarPubMed
Albeny-Simões, D, Murrell, EG, Elliot, SL, Andrade, MR, Lima, E, Juliano, SA and Vilela, EF (2014) Attracted to the enemy: Aedes aegypti prefers oviposition sites with predator-killed conspecifics. Oecologia 175, 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almadiy, AA (2020) Chemical composition, insecticidal and biochemical effects of two plant oils and their major fractions against Aedes aegypti, the common vector of dengue fever. Heliyon 6, e04915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alto, BW, Lounibos, LP, Higgs, S and Juliano, SA (2005) Larval competition differentially affects arbovírus infection in Aedes mosquitoes. Ecology 86, 3279–3288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altwegg, R (2003) Multistage density dependence in an amphibian. Oecologia 136, 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, MR, Albeny-Simões, D, Breaux, JA, Juliano, SA and Lima, E (2017) Are behavioural responses to predation cues linked across life cycle stages? Ecological Entomology 42, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrese, EL and Soulages, JL (2010) Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annual Review of Entomology 55, 207–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrera, R, Amador, M and Clark, GG (2006) Ecological factors influencing Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) productivity in artificial containers in Salinas, Puerto Rico. Journal of Medical Entomology 43, 484–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, N, Petric, D, Zgomba, M, Boase, C, Madon, M, Dahl, C and Kaiser, A (2010) Mosquitoes and their control. In Rangeland Ecology & Management, vol. 2. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, pp. 1–594. https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0684:br]2.0.co;2.Google Scholar
Bellamy, SK and Alto, BW (2018) Mosquito responses to trait- and density-mediated interactions of predation. Oecologia 187, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bevins, SN (2008) Invasive mosquitoes, larval competition, and indirect effects on the vector competence of native mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae). Biological Invasions 10, 1109–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, S, Basedow, T and Becker, N (1997) Culicidae (Diptera) in the Diet of Predatory Stages of Anurans (Amphibia) in Humid Biotopes of the Rhine Valley in Germany. Journal of Vector Ecology 22, 23–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Briegel, H, Knusel, I and Timmermann, SE (2001) Aedes aegypti: Size, reserves, survival, and flight potential. Journal of Vector Ecology 26, 21–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Bybee, S, Córdoba-Aguilar, A, Duryea, MC, Futahashi, R, Hansson, B, Lorenzo-Carballa, MO, Schilder, R, Stoks, R, Suvorov, A, Svensson, EI, Swaegers, J, Takahashi, Y, Watts, PC and Wellenreuther, M (2016) Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) as a bridge between ecology and evolutionary genomics. Frontiers in Zoology 13, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canty, A and Ripley, B (2016) Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1, 3–4.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, LPdG, Pontes, RJS, Regazzi, ACF, de Paula Júnior, FJ, Frutuoso, RL, Sousa, EP, Dantas Filho, FF and Lima, JWdO (2007) Competência de peixes como predadores de larvas de Aedes aegypti, em condições de laboratório. Revista de Saúde Pública 41, 638–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasegaran, K, Rao Kandregula, S, Quader, S and Juliano, SA (2018) Context-dependent interactive effects of nonlethal predation on larvae impact adult longevity and body composition. PLoS ONE 13, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coelho, WMD, de Carvalho Apolinário Coêlho, J, Bresciani, KDS and Buzetti, WAS (2017) Biological control of Anopheles darlingi, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus larvae using shrimps. Parasite Epidemiology and Control 2, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CoreTeam, R. (2008). R: a language and environment for statistical computing (Vol. 2). Available at https://www.r-project.org/.Google Scholar
Costanzo, KS, Muturi, EJ and Alto, BW (2011) Trait-mediated effects of predation across life-history stages in container mosquitoes. Ecological Entomology 36, 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, MJ (2007) The R Book. In The R Book. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creel, S, Christianson, D, Liley, S and Winnie, JA (2007) Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk. Science 315, 960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creel, S, Becker, M, Dröge, E, M'soka, J, Matandiko, W, Rosenblatt, E, Mweetwa, T, Mwape, H, Vinks, M, Goodheart, B, Merkle, J, Mukula, T, Smit, D, Sanguinetti, C, Dart, C, Christianson, D and Schuette, P (2019) What explains variation in the strength of behavioral responses to predation risk? A standardized test with large carnivore and ungulate guilds in three ecosystems. Biological Conservation 232, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, WR, Soares-da-Silva, J, Ferreira, FAdS, Rodrigues, IB, Tadei, WP and Zequi, JAC (2018) Oviposition of Aedes aegypti Linnaeus, 1762 and Aedes albopictus Skuse, 1894 (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory and field conditions using ovitraps associated to different control agents, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 62, 304–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, AC and Hinkley, DV (1997) Bootstrap Methods and their Application, Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Carvalho, G, Cozzer, GD, Rezende, RDS, Dal Magro, J and Simões, DA (2020) EFEITO SINERGÉTICO DO BTI E PREDAÇÃO SOBRE A MORTALIDADE DE LARVAS DO MOSQUITO Aedes aegypti (LINNAEUS, 1762). Revista Acta Ambiental Catarinense 17, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmer, J and Gabrieli, P (2020) Transstadial metabolic priming mediated by larval nutrition in female Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. Journal of Insect Physiology 123, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104053CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dutra, HLC, Rocha, MN, Dias, FBS, Mansur, SB, Caragata, EP and Moreira, LA (2016) Wolbachia blocks currently circulating Zika virus isolates in Brazilian Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Cell Host and Microbe 19, 771–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincke, OM, Yanoviak, SP and Hanschu, RD (1997) Predation by odonates depresses mosquito abundance in water-filled tree holes in Panama. Oecologia 112, 244–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govindarajan, M, Rajeswary, M, Senthilmurugan, S, Vijayan, P, Alharbi, NS, Kadaikunnan, S, Khaled, JM and Benelli, G (2018) Larvicidal activity of the essential oil from Amomum subulatum Roxb. (Zingiberaceae) against Anopheles subpictus, Aedes albopictus and Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae), and non-target impact on four mosquito natural enemies. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 101, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, K, Dujardin, JP, Mouline, K, Dabiré, RK, Renault, D and Simard, F (2015) Seasonal variation in wing size and shape between geographic populations of the malaria vector, Anopheles coluzzii in Burkina Faso (West Africa). Acta Tropica 143, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleckner, CA, Hawley, WA, Bradshaw, WE, Christina, M, Holzapfel, CM and Fisher, IJ (2016) Protandry in Aedes sierrensis: the significance of temporal variation in female fecundity. Ecology 76, 1242–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koricheva, J, Gurevitch, J and Mengersen, K (2013) eds. Handbook of meta-analysis in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princenton. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691137285.001.0001Google Scholar
Lea, AO, Briegel, H and Lea, HM (1978) Arrest, resorption, or maturation of oöcytes in Aedes aegypti: dependence on the quantity of blood and the interval between blood meals. Physiological Entomology 3, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marten, GG and Reid, JW (2007) Cyclopoid copepods. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 23(2 Suppl.), 65–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcintire, KM and Juliano, SA (2018) How can mortality increase population size? A test of two mechanistic hypotheses. Ecology 99, 1660–1670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merritt, RW, Dadd, RH and Walker, ED (1992) Feeding behavior, natural food, and nutritional relationships of larval mosquitoes. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 349–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Multerer, L, Smith, T and Chitnis, N (2019) Modeling the impact of sterile males on an Aedes aegypti population with optimal control. Mathematical Biosciences 311, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakazawa, MM, Araújo, AP, Melo-Santos, MAV, Oliveira, CMF and Silva-Filha, MHNL (2020) Efficacy and persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis (Bti) and pyriproxyfen-based products in artificial breeding sites colonized with susceptible or Bti-exposed Aedes aegypti larvae. Biological Control 151, 104400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlberger, J, Langangen, Ø, Edeline, E, Claessen, D, Winfield, IJ, Stenseth, NC and Vøllestad, LA (2011) Stage-specific biomass overcompensation by juveniles in response to increased adult mortality in a wild fish population. Ecology 92, 2175–2182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ower, GD and Juliano, SA (2019) The demographic and life-history costs of fear: trait-mediated effects of threat of predation on Aedes triseriatus. Ecology and Evolution 9, 3794–3806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padmanabha, H, Correa, F, Legros, M, Nijhout, HF, Lord, C and Lounibos, LP (2012) An eco-physiological model of the impact of temperature on Aedes aegypti life history traits. Journal of Insect Physiology 58, 1597–1608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pamplona, LdGC, Lima, JWdO, Cunha, JCdL and Santana, EWdP (2004) Avaliação do impacto na infestação por Aedes aegypti em tanques de cimento do município de Canindé, Ceará, Brasil, após a utilização do peixe Betta splendens como alternativa de controle biológico. Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 37, 400–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaistow, SJ, Lapsley, CT, Beckerman, AP and Benton, TG (2004) Age and size at maturity: sex, environmental variability and developmental thresholds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271, 919–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preisser, EL, Bolnick, DI and Benard, MF (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86, 501–509. http://www.esajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1890/04-0719%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/040F9073-624F-43EA-8E10-9FB1CFAFCF04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preisser, EL, Bolnick, DI and Grabowski, JH (2009) Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey. Ecology Letters 12, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiskind, MH and Lounibos, LP (2009) Effects of intraspecific larval competition on adult longevity in the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Bone 23, 62–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Relyea, RA (2000) Trait-mediated indirect effects in larval anurans: reversing competition with the threat of predation. Ecology 81, 2278–2289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, HDR (2014). Perfil de susceptibilidade da população de Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) da ilha de Santiago, Cabo Verde, a inseticidas. Dissertação de Mestrado 1, 15–63. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/saglikli-beslenme-hareketli-hayat-db/Yayinlar/kitaplar/diger-kitaplar/TBSA-Beslenme-Yayini.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rosa, CS and DeSouza, O (2011) Spiders, ants and an Amazonian myrmecophyte: a tale of trophic cascades. Sociobiology 58, 403–418.Google Scholar
Santos, VSV, Limongi, JE and Pereira, BB (2020) Association of low concentrations of pyriproxyfen and spinosad as an environment-friendly strategy to rationalize Aedes aegypti control programs. Chemosphere 247, 125795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schröder, A, van Leeuwen, A and Cameron, TC (2014) When less is more: positive population-level effects of mortality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 29, 614–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slice, DE (2007) Geometric morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology 36, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares-da-Silva, J, Queirós, SG, de Aguiar, JS, Viana, JL, Neta, MdRAV, da Silva, MC, Pinheiro, VCS, Polanczyk, RA, Carvalho-Zilse, GA and Tadei, WP (2017) Molecular characterization of the gene profile of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner isolated from Brazilian ecosystems and showing pathogenic activity against mosquito larvae of medical importance. Acta Tropica 176, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, MR and Reznick, DN (2009) Phenotypic diversification across an environmental gradient: a role for predators and resource availability on the evolution of life histories. Evolution 63, 3201–3213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2012) Global strategy for dengue prevention and control 2012–2020. WHO Library Cataloguing 1, 8–31.Google Scholar
WHO (2016) Test procedures for insecticide resistance – technical update 2016. WHO Library Cataloguing 1, 2–20.Google Scholar
Wormington, JD and Juliano, SA (2014) Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Evolutionary Ecology Research 16, 223–234.Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Image

Cozzer et al. supplementary material

Cozzer et al. supplementary material 1

Download Cozzer et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 260.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Cozzer et al. supplementary material

Cozzer et al. supplementary material 2

Download Cozzer et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13 KB
Supplementary material: File

Cozzer et al. supplementary material

Cozzer et al. supplementary material 3

Download Cozzer et al. supplementary material(File)
File 42 KB