Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:47:02.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Persistence and Fate of DDT on Foliage. II.—Comparative Rates of Loss of DDT Deposits from Glass Plates and Growing Leaves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Insecticides and Fungicides, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
P. E. Burt
Affiliation:
Department of Insecticides and Fungicides, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.

Extract

A method is described of applying even deposits of insecticide to leaves without detaching the leaves from the plants. The insecticide is sprayed by hand from an air-operated paint-spray gun under controlled conditions. Using this method for applying the insecticide, the persistence of DDT on living leaves and on glass plates was investigated.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bliss, C. I. (1934). The method of probits.—Science, 79, pp. 3839, 409–110.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. F. & Sweetman, H. L. (1949). The residual property of DDT as influenced by temperature and moisture.—J. econ. Ent., 42, pp. 420423.Google Scholar
Burt, P. E. & Ward, J. (1955). The persistence and fate of DDT on foliage. I. The influence of plant wax on the toxicity and persistence of deposits of DDT crystals.—Bull. ent. Res., 46, pp. 3956.Google Scholar
Decker, G. C., Weinman, C. J. & Bann, J. M. (1950). A preliminary report on the rate of insecticide residue loss from treated plants.—J. econ. Ent., 43, pp. 919927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1947). Probit analysis.—256 pp. Cambridge, Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, F. A., Lindgren, D. L., Elliot, M. I. & Ladue, J. P. (1946). Persistence of certain DDT deposits under field conditions.—J. econ. Ent., 39, pp. 624627.Google Scholar
Hadaway, A. B. & Barlow, F. (1949). Further studies on the loss of insecticides by absorption into mud and vegetation.—Bull. ent. Res., 40, pp. 323343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, A. H. (1947). Relation between particle size and shape of insecticidal suspensions and their contact toxicity. I. D.D.T. suspensions against Tribolium castaneum Hb.—Ann. appl. Biol., 34, pp. 586610.Google Scholar
Martin, J. T. & Batt, R. F. (1954). Spray application problems: VII. The determination of DDT in plant materials.—Rep. agric. hort. Res. Sta. Bristol, 1953, pp. 121128.Google Scholar
Mistric, W. J. Jr., & Gaines, J. C. (1953). Effect of wind and other factors on the toxicity of certain insecticides.—J. econ. Ent., 46, pp. 341349.Google Scholar
Pradhan, S. (1949 a). Studies on the toxicity of insecticide films. II. Effect oftemperature on the toxicity of DDT films.—Bull. ent. Res., 40, pp. 239265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradhan, S. (1949 b). Studies on the toxicity of insecticide films. III. Effect of relative humidity on the toxicity of films. Bull. ent. Res., 40, pp. 431444.Google Scholar
Satyanarayana, P. (1954). The insecticidal efficiency of DDT deposits applied to apple foliage as solutions or emulsions.—J. hort. Sci., 29, pp. 112125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, E. M. & Hinkley, H. S. (1946). DDT and related compounds for control of Black Scale on olives.—Circ. Calif, agric. Exp. Sta., no. 365, pp. 9193.Google Scholar
Symes, C. B., Hadaway, A. B., Barlow, F. & Galley, W. (1948). Field experiments with DDT and benzene hexachloride against Tsetse (Glossina palpalis).—Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 591612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teotia, T. P. S. & Dahm, P. A. (1950). The effect of temperature, humidity and weathering on the residual toxicities to the House Fly of five organic insecticides.—J. econ. Ent., 43, pp. 864876.Google Scholar