Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:56:29.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oviposition behaviour and host colony size discrimination in Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J.P. Sutherland ,
M.S. Sullivan  and
G.M. Poppy
J.P. Sutherland
Affiliation:
Behavioural and Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, the Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK Department of Entomology and Nematology, IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK
M.S. Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Behavioural and Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, the Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK
G.M. Poppy
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Nematology, IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK
*
*Fax: + 44 (0)161 247 6325 E-mail: M.Sullivan@mmu.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three bioassays were used to examine the oviposition behaviour of the hoverfly, Episyrphus balteatus (Degeer) in which various stimuli purported to influence host assessment and choice were tested. Episyrphus balteatus failed to exhibit enhanced behavioural responses, terms of approaches and landings, to artificial leaves with the highest numbers of aphids, suggesting that females are merely responding to the colour of the artificial leaves. A density-dependent oviposition response was reported in a second bioassay using whole bean plants, although there an asymptotic relationship. Syrphid responses, which were measured by oviposition over a five-day period, were greatest towards those plants with the highest number of aphids. In a final series of trials, gravid female E. balteatus showed a behavioural preference for filter papers with the greatest honeydew concentrations (0.26 mg μl−1 honeydew). More time was spent in the treated areas and syrphids demonstrated more proboscis and ovipositor extensions in these treatments. These bioassays provided an opportunity to isolate some of the individual of decision-making by female E. balteatus during egg-laying behaviour. A greater understanding of natural enemy behaviour is essential before enhanced control of pest populations in the field can be established.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 91 , Issue 5 , October 2001 , pp. 411 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ankersmit, G.W., Dijkman, H., Keuning, N.J., Mertens, H., Sins, A. & Tacoma, H.M. (1986) Episyrphus balteatus as a predator of the aphid Sitobion avenae on winter wheat. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 42, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargen, H., Saudhof, K. & Poehling, H.M. (1998) Prey finding by larvae and adult females of Episyrphus balteatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 87, 245– 254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Saad, A.A. & Bishop, G.W. (1976) Effect of artificial honeydews on insect communities in potato fields. Environmental Entomology 5, 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bombosch, S. & Volk, S.T. (1966) Selection of the oviposition sites by Syrphus corollae Fabr. pp. 117–119 in Hodek, I. (Ed.) Ecology of aphidophagous insects. Symposium Proceedings. Prague, 1965.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Y. & Cloutier, C. (1984) Honeydew as a source of host-searching kairomones for the aphid parasitoid, Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 62, 1513–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budenberg, W.J. & Powell, W. (1992) The role of honeydew as an ovipositional stimulant for two species of syrphids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 64, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R.J. & Adams, T.H.L. (1986) Quantification of the impact of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) on cereal aphids in winter wheat: an analysis of field populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 23, 895–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A.E.F. (1966) Some aspects of host plant selection in aphidophagous Syrphidae pp. 113–115 in Hodek, I. (Ed.) Ecology of aphidophagous insects. Symposium Proceedings, Prague. 1965.Google Scholar
Chandler, A.E.F. (1968) Some host-plant factors affecting oviposition by aphidophagous Syrphidae (Diptera). Annals of Applied Biology 61, 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A.E.F. (1968) The relationship between aphid infestations and oviposition by aphidophagous Syrphidae (Diptera). Annals of Applied Biology 61, 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, T.J. (1959) Studies on the oviposition behaviour of Syrphidae (Diptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 111, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E.W. & Swallow, J.G. (1993) Numerical responses of natural enemies to artificial honeydew in Utah alfalfa. Environmental Entomology 22, 1392–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geusen-Pfister von, H. (1987) Untersuchungen zur Biologie und zum Reproduktionsvermögen von Episyrphus balteatus Deg. (Dipt., Syrphidae) unter Gewächshausbedingungen. Journal of Applied Entomology 104, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, P.J. (1984) Oviposition strategies of aphidophagous syrphids. Unpublished PhD thesis, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.Google Scholar
Hagen, K.S., Sawall, E.F. & Tassan, R.L. (1971) The use of food sprays to increase effectiveness of entomophagous insects. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Conference of Ecological Control by Habitat Management 2, 59–81.Google Scholar
Hagen, K.S., Greany, P., Sawall, E.F. & Tassan, R.L. (1976) Tryptophan in artificial honeydews as a source of an attractant for adult Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environmental Entomology 5, 458–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemptinne, J.-L., Dixon, A.F.G., Doucet, J.-L. & Petersen, J.-E. (1993) Optimal foraging by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) and ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): mechanisms. European Journal of Entomology 90, 451–455.Google Scholar
Hemptinne, J.-L., Doucet, J.-L. & Gaspar, C. (1994) How do ladybirds and syrphids respond to aphids in the field? Bulletin IOBC/WPRS (Integrated Control in Cereals) 17, 101–111.Google Scholar
Hood-Henderson, D.E. (1982) Fine structure and neurophysi- ology of a gustatory sensillum on the ovipositors of Metasyrphus venablesi and Eupeodes volucris (Diptera: Syrphidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 3187–3195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood-Henderson, D.E. & Wellington, W.G. (1982) Antennal sensilla of some aphidophagous Syrphidae (Diptera): fine structure and electroanntennogramme study. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 3172–3286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, K. & Iwao, S. (1977) Oviposition behavior of a syrphid, Episyrphus balteatus, in relation to aphid density on the plant. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomological Zoology 21, 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, E. (1988) Assessment of aphid colonies by hoverflies. I. Maple aphids and Episyrphus balteatus (de Geer) (Diptera: Syrphidae). Journal of Ethology 6, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, E. (1988) Assessment of aphid colonies by hoverflies. II. Pea aphids and 3 syrphid species; Betasyrphus serarius (Weidemann) Metasyrphus frequens (Matsumura) and Syrphus vitripennis (Meigen) (Diptera: Syrphidae). Journal of Ethology 6, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, E. (1989) Assessment of aphid colonies by hoverflies. III. Pea aphids and Episyrphus balteatus (de Geer) (Diptera: Syrphidae). Journal of Ethology 7, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, E. & Sasakawa, M. (1986) Assessment of the maple aphid colony by the hoverfly, Episyrphus balteatus (de Geer) (Diptera: Syrphidae). Journal of Ethology 4, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, P.K., Jervis, M.A. & Kidd, N.A.C. (1994) Use of sprayed L-tryptophan solution to concentrate numbers of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea in an olive tree canopy. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 70, 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, C. (1910) Oviposition of Baccha. Entomologists' Monthly Magazine 46, 192–193.Google Scholar
Sadeghi, H. & Gilbert, F. (2000) Oviposition preferences of aphidophagous hoverflies. Ecological Entomology 25, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, W. (1979) Der Eiablageverhalten der Schwebfliege Syrphus corollae Fabr. in Abhängigkeit von der Grosse der Blattlauskolonie. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoologie 66, 217–232.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. (1982) Der Einfluß von Farbe und Beleuchtung des Umfeldes auf die Eiablagehandlung der Schwebfliege Syrphus corollae Fabr. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoologie 69, 283–297.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. (1983) Das Suchverhalten legebereiter Syrphus corollae Fabr. (Dipt., Syrphidae) in Abhängigkeit von optischen Marken. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoologie 70, 235–247.Google Scholar
Scholz, D. & Poehling, H.M. (2000) Oviposition site selection of Episyrphus balteatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 94, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shonouda, M.L. (1996) Crude aqueous-extract (kairomone) from Aphis fabae Scop. (Hom., Aphidae) and its effect on the behaviour of the predator Metasyrphus corollae (Dipt., Syrphidae) female. Journal of Applied Entomology 120, 489–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.G. (1969) Some effects of crop background on populations of aphids and their natural enemies on Brussels sprouts. Annals of Applied Biology 63, 326–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.G. (1976) Influence of crop background on aphids and other phytophagous insects on Brussels sprouts. Annals of Applied Biology 83, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, J.P., Sullivan, M.S. & Poppy, G.M. (1999) The influence of floral character on the foraging behaviour of the hoverfly, Episyrphus balteatus (Degeer) (Diptera: Syrphidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 93, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, G., Landis, B.J. & Weeks, R.E. (1967) Autumn populations of green peach aphid on peach trees and the role of syrphid flies in their control. Journal of Economic Entomology 60, 433–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenhumberg, B. & Poehling, H.-M. (1991) Studies on the efficiency of syrphid larvae, as predators of aphids on winter wheat. pp. 281–288 in Polgár, L., Chambers, R.J., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hodek, I. (Eds) Behaviour and impact of Aphidophaga. Proceedings of the 4th Meeting of the IOBC working group, SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1984) Parasitoid–host relationship pp. 205–233 in Bell, W.J. & Cardé, R.T. (Eds) Chemical ecology of insects. London, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, A. (1977) Ocena skutecznosci drapieznictwa Episyrphus balteatus (Deg.) (Diptera, Syrphidae) w ograniczaniu Aphis pomi Deg. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 47, 755–760.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. 4th edn. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar