Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T21:09:56.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The movement and distribution of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) larvae on pea plants is affected by egg placement and flowering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2010

L.E. Perkins ,
B.W. Cribb ,
J. Hanan  and
M.P. Zalucki
L.E. Perkins*
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, St Lucia, Australia, 4072
B.W. Cribb
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, St Lucia, Australia, 4072 The University of Queensland, Centre for Microscopy & Microanalysis, St Lucia, Australia, 4072
J. Hanan
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, Centre for Biological Information Technology, St Lucia, Australia, 4072
M.P. Zalucki
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, St Lucia, Australia, 4072
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +61 7 3365 1655 E-mail: l.perkins@uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The distribution and movement of 1st instar Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae on whole garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants were determined in glasshouse trials. This economically-important herbivore attacks a wide variety of agricultural, horticultural and indigenous plants. To investigate the mechanisms underlying larval intra-plant movement, we used early-flowering and wild-type plant genotypes and placed eggs at different vertical heights within the plants, one egg per plant. Leaf water and nitrogen content and cuticle hardness were measured at the different plant heights. Of 92 individual larvae, 41% did not move from the node of eclosion, 49% moved upwards and 10% moved downwards with the distance moved being between zero and ten plant nodes. Larvae from eggs placed on the lower third of the plant left the natal leaf more often and moved further than larvae from eggs placed in the middle or upper thirds. The low nutritive value of leaves was the most likely explanation for more movement away from lower plant regions. Although larvae on flowering plants did not move further up or down than larvae on non-flowering plants, they more often departed the leaflet (within a leaf) where they eclosed. The final distribution of larvae was affected by plant genotype, with larvae on flowering plants found less often on leaflets and more often on stipules, tendrils and reproductive structures. Understanding intra-plant movement by herbivorous insects under natural conditions is important because such movement determines the value of economic loss to host crops. Knowing the behaviour underlying the spatial distribution of herbivores on plants will assist us to interpret field data and should lead to better informed pest management decisions.

Keywords

behaviourfirst instarsintra-plant movementplant attributes
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 100 , Issue 5 , October 2010 , pp. 591 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernays, E., Woodhead, S. & Haines, L. (1985) Climbing by newly hatched larvae of the spotted stalk borer Chilo partellus to the top of sorghum plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 39, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisane, K.D. & Katole, S.R. (2008) Life table studies of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) on pidgeon pea. Indian Journal of Entomology 70, 350–355.Google Scholar
Callahan, P.S. (1957) Oviposition response of the corn earworm to differences in surface texture. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 30, 59–63.Google Scholar
Hassan, S.T. (1983) Distribution of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) and Heliothis punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs and larvae, and insecticide spray droplets on cotton plants. PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Hochberg, M.E. (1987) The within-plant distribution and feeding behaviour of Heliothis armigera Hübner (Lep., Noctuidae) on greenhouse tomatoes. Journal of Applied Entomology 104, 256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.-L. & Zalucki, M.P. (2005) Foraging behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera first instar larvae on crop plants of different developmental stages. Journal of Applied Entomology 129, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.-L. & Zalucki, M.P. (2007) Feeding and foraging behaviour of a generalist caterpillar: are third instars just bigger versions of firsts? Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M.-L., Merritt, D.J., Cribb, B.W., Trent, C. & Zalucki, M.P. (2006) Hidden trails: The visualization and use of silk in relation to movement by lepidopteran larvae on differing substrates. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 121, 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, R., Getz, W.M., Revilla, E., Holyoak, M., Kadmon, R., Saltz, D. & Smouse, P.E. (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 19052–19059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, L.E., Cribb, B.W., Hanan, J., Glaze, E., Beveridge, C. & Zalucki, M.P. (2008) Where to from here? The mechanisms enabling the movement of first instar caterpillars on whole plants using Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Arthropod-Plant Interactions 2, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, L.E., Cribb, B.W., Hanan, J. & Zalucki, M.P. (2009) The role of two plant-derived volatiles in the foraging movement of 1st instar Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner): time to stop and smell the flowers. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 3, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perovic, D.J., Johnson, M.-L., Scholz, B. & Zalucki, M.P. (2008) The mortality of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) neonate larvae in relation to drop-off and soil surface temperature: the dangers of bungy jumping. Australian Journal of Entomology 47, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Rajapakse, C.N.K. & Walter, G.H. (2007) Polyphagy and primary host plants: oviposition preference versus larval performance in the lepidopteran pest Helicoverpa armigera. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 1, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajapakse, C., Walter, G.H., Moore, C.J., Hull, C.D. & Cribb, B.W. (2006) Host recognition by a polyphagous lepidopteran (Helicoverpa armigera):primary host plants, host produced volatiles and neurosensory stimulation. Physiological Entomology 31, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayment, G.E. & Higginson, F.R. (1992) Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods. Melbourne Australia, Inkata Press.Google Scholar
Reed, W. & Pawar, C.S. (1982) Heliothis: A global problem. p. 9 in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Heliothis Management. ICRISAT Patancheru, 15–20 November 1981, Andhra Pradesh, India.Google Scholar
Teakle, R.E. & Jensen, J.M. (1985) Heliothis punctiger. pp. 313–322in Singh, P. & Moore, R.F. (Eds) Handbook of Insect Rearing Vol. II. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York, USA, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L.T. & Waite, G.K. (1982) Feeding pattern of Australian Heliothis on cotton. Environmental Entomology 11, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., Johnson, M.-L. & Zalucki, M.P. (2008) Possible effect of genetically modified cotton on foraging habits of early instar Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Australian Journal of Entomology 47, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalucki, M.P., Daglish, G., Firempong, S. & Twine, P. (1986) The biology and ecology of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia: What do we know? Australian Journal of Zoology 34, 779–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalucki, M.P., Murray, D.A.H., Gregg, P.C., Fitt, G.P., Twine, P.H. & Jones, C. (1994) Ecology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera in the inland areas of eastern Australia: larval sampling and host plant relationships during winter/spring. Australian Journal of Zoology 42, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalucki, M.P., Clarke, A.R. & Malcolm, S.B. (2002) Ecology and behaviour of first instar larval Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 361–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed