Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T23:51:32.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Longevity and pheromone output in stored-product Bostrichidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

P.A. Edde*
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, 127 Noble Research Center, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
T.W. Phillips
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, 127 Noble Research Center, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
*Present address and address for correspondence: Montana State University, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA Fax: 406 994 3933 E-mail: edde@montana.edu

Abstract

Information on longevity and on the effect of ageing on pheromone signalling in Bostrichidae infesting stored products is important because pheromones play a crucial role in mediating aggregation by the species in storages. The longevity of starved and unstarved Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) and Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabricius) were determined at 28±1°C, 65±2% RH and L12:D12 cycle. Additionally, the effects of ageing on rate of pheromone emission were investigated in R. dominica by comparing emission rates of the aggregation pheromones Dominicalure-1 (DL1) and Dominicalure-2 (DL2) released by adult males ranging from 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 weeks of age. Mean survival time of starved male and female P. truncatus was 8.6±0.6 and 9.1±0.4 days, respectively. Starved R. dominica males lived for 5.7±0.2 days, and females for 4.7±0.1 days. However, mean survival times were not significantly different for starved males vs. females of either species. Mean survival time of unstarved male and female P. truncatus was 27.5±2.0 and 18.0±3.3 weeks, respectively, and for unstarved male and female R. dominica was 26.1±2.8 and 16.7±2.9 weeks, respectively. Difference in mean survival times of unstarved males vs. females in both P. truncatus and R. dominica were significant. Between species, no significant difference was observed in mean survival time between unstarved males of P. truncatus or R. dominica, nor between females of both species. Rate of pheromone emission in R. dominica was higher when the insects were relatively young (4, 8 and 12 weeks old), but declined by almost 55% in treatments where the insect were at about 24 or 48 weeks old, suggesting that recruitment potential of R. dominica might reduce substantially as the insects age.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, J. (1997) Animal behavior. 640 pp. 6th edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (1994) Sexual selection. 624 pp Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcay, S.J. & Bennett, G.W. (1991) Influence of starvation and light on the movement behavior of the German cockroach. Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 15201524.Google ScholarPubMed
Bell, R.J. & Watters, F.L. (1982) Environmental factors influencing the development and rate of increase of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), on stored maize. Journal of Stored Products Research 18, 131142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, L.A. & Smith, R.H. (2000) Function of the aggregation pheromone in the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus: variation in response to individuals as evidence for a role in sexual selection. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 13251339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkholder, W.E. & Ma, M. (1985) Pheromones for monitoring and control of stored-product insects. Annual of Review of Entomology 30, 257272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J.R. (1993) Applied demography for biologists with special emphasis on insects. 224 pp. New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogburn, R.R., Burkholder, W.E. & Williams, H.J. (1984) Field test with aggregation pheromone of the lesser grain borer (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) (Rhyzopertha dominica, pest of stored grain). Environmental Entomology 13, 162166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cork, A., Hall, D.R., Hodges, R.J. & Pickett, J.A. (1991) Identification of major components of the male produced aggregation pheromones of the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 17, 789803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crombie, A.C. (1941) On oviposition, olfactory conditioning and host selection in Rhyzopertha dominica Fab. (Insecta, Coleoptera). Journal of Experimental Biology 18, 6279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendy, J., Dobie, P., Smith, J.A. & Urono, J.L. (1991) Trials to assess the effectiveness of new synthetic pheromone mixtures for trapping Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in maize stores. Journal of Stored Products Research 27, 6974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edde, P.A. (2005) Studies with the aggregation pheromones of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae): habitat affinities, seasonal flight activity, and pheromone-mediated host selection behavior. PhD dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Edde, P.A. & Amatobi, C.I. (2003) Seed coat has no value in protecting cowpea seed against attack by Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Journal of Stored Products Research 39, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edde, P.A. & Phillips, T.W. (2006) Potential host affinities for the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae): behavioral responses to host odors and pheromones and reproductive ability on non-grain hosts. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 119, 255263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edde, P.A., Phillips, T.W. & Toews, M.D. (2005) Responses of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) to its aggregation pheromones as influenced by trap design, trap height and habitat. Environmental Entomology 34, 15491557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W.S. (1950) A revision of the North American species of beetles belonging to the family Bostrichidae. Miscellaneous Publication No. 698. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C.W., Dublin, L. & Pollitt, S.J. (2003) Gender differences in lifespan and mortality rates in two seed beetles species. Functional Ecology 17, 619626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, D.L. (1935) The temperature and humidity relations of the cockroach, III. A comparison of temperature preference, and rates of desiccation and respiration of Periplaneta americana, Blatta orientalis and Blatella germanica. Journal of Experimental Biology 12, 185190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, R.J. (1986) The biology and control of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) – a destructive storage pest with an increasing range. Journal of Stored Products Research 22, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, R.J., Cork, A. & Hall, D.R. (1984) Aggregation pheromones for monitoring the greater grain borer Prostephanus truncatus, pp. 255 – 260 in Proceedings British Crop Protection Conference. Pests and Diseases.November 1984,Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Khorramshahi, A. & Burkholder, W.E. (1981) Behavior of the lesser grain borer Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 7, 3338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotiaho, J.S., Alatalo, R.V., Mappes, J., Nielsen, M.G., Parri, S. & Rivero, A. (1998) Energetic cost of size and sexual signalling in a wolf spider. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, Biological Science 265, 22032209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotiaho, J.S. & Simmons, L.W. (2003) Longevity cost of reproduction for males but no longevity cost of mating or courtship for females in the male-dimorphic dung beetle Onthophagus binodis. Journal of Insect Physiology 49, 817822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linn, C.E., Bjostad, L.B., Du, J.W. & Roelofs, W.L. (1984) Redundancy in a chemical signal: behavioral responses of male Trichoplusia ni to a 6-component sex pheromone blend. Journal of Chemical Ecology 10, 16351658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, T.J. (1994) Pheromone production and behavioral response to pheromones in the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). MS thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.Google Scholar
McBrien, H.L., Millar, J.G., Rice, R.E., McElfresh, J.S., Cullen, E. & Zalom, F.G. (2002) Sex attractant pheromone of the red-shouldered stink bug Thyanta pallidovirens: a pheromone blend with multiple redundant components. Journal of Chemical Ecology 28, 17971818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papadopoulos, N.T., Katsoyannos, B.L., Kouloussis, N.A., Carey, J.R., Müller, H.-G. & Zhang, Y. (2004) High sexual signalling rates of young individuals predict extended life span in male Mediterranean fruit flies. Oecologia 138, 127134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, L., Green, A. & Fowler, K. (1987) Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology 30, 745749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, C. (1935) The biology and distribution of Rhyzopertha dominica (Fab.). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society 83, 449482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, C.R., Hagstrum, D.W., Flinn, P.W. & Allen, R.F. (2003) Wheat in bins and discharge spouts, and grain residue on floors of empty bins in concrete grain elevators as habitats for stored-grain beetles and their natural enemies. Journal of Stored Products Research 96, 9961004.Google ScholarPubMed
Ringo, J. (1996) Sexual receptivity in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 41, 473494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute (2001) SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Scholz, D.C., Borgemeister, C., Meikle, W.E., Markham, R.H. & Poehling, H.M. (1997) Infestation of maize by Prostephanus truncatus initiated by male-produced pheromone. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83, 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shires, S.W. (1980) Life history of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) at optimum conditions of temperature. Journal of Stored Products Research 16, 147150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D.W.E. & Warner, H.R. (1989) Does genotypic sex have a direct effect on longevity? Experimental Gerontology 24, 277288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J.L., Cork, A., Hall, D.R. & Hodges, R.J. (1996) Investigation of the effect of female larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), and their residue on the production of aggregation pheromone by males. Journal of Stored Products Research 32, 171181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H.J., Silverstein, R.M., Burkholder, W.E. & Khorramshahi, A. (1981) Dominicalure 1 and 2: components of aggregation pheromone from male lesser grain borer Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 7, 759781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, E.R. & Lewis, N. (1957) The longevity of starved cockroaches. Journal of Economic Entomology 50, 430440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar