Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:16:10.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Laboratory Method for testing Residual Insecticides against Anopheline Mosquitos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. A. Reid
J. A. Reid
Affiliation:
Institute for Medical Research, Malaya.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three interconnecting cages, the largest of which was about 2 feet square, were used in experiments with Anopheles vagus bred from wild-caught larvae.

Variations in the arrangement of these cages showed that:

1. The mosquitos are quiescent by day, if not disturbed, whether kept in the light or in darkness.

2. If they are in complete darkness by night, as in a photographic darkroom, they fly vertically upwards. They will readily escape from a cage about one foot square, with a hold half an inch in diameter in the top, in their continued attempts to fly upwards.

3. They are attracted by a dim light at night and will fly sideways or to a lesser extent slightly downwards, in opposition to the tendency to vertical upward flight. In this way they can pass through openings which they would miss if in complete darkness. Light will not cause them to fly vertically downwards.

4. Anopheles maculatus is less responsive to light under these conditions, than A. vagus.

Using A. vagus, tests were made of the toxicity and residual effect of DDT, BHC and Chlordane as wettable powders on plywood panels. The order of toxicity when fresh was found to be BHC, Chlordane, DDT; the order of the residual effectiveness was DDT, BHC, Chlordane.

A considerable mortality occurred amongst mosquitos surviving the overnight tests with DDT and BHC, if they were kept for a further 48 housrs.

A larger proportion of females was killed than of males, especially by DDT and Chlordane.

BHC was shown to have a marked repellent effect, comparable with that of citronella, but whereas citronella repelled without killing, BHC repelled, but also caused a high subsequent mortality.

A. maculatus was tested once against DDT, and once against BHC in the main series of tests, and was much more readily killed than A. vagus, presumably because of its weaker response to light causing it to remain longer in the main cage in contact with the treated panels.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , May 1951 , pp. 761 - 777
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide.—J. econ. Ent., 18, pp. 265–267.Google Scholar
Bertram, D. M. (1950). Malaria control by residual insecticides.—Brit. med. J., 05 20th, 1950, p. 1, 200.Google Scholar
Busvine, J. R. & Kennedy, J. S. (1949). Experiments with insecticidal smokes for indoor use.—Ann. appl. Biol., 36, pp. 76–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christophers, S. R. (1947). Mosquito repellents.—J. Hyg., 45, pp. 176–231.Google Scholar
Cutkomp, L. K. (1947). Residual sprays to control Anopheles quadrimaculatus.—J. econ. Ent., 40, pp. 328–333.Google Scholar
David, W. A. L. & Bracey, P. (1946). Factors influencing the interaction of insecticidal mists on flying insects. Part III. Biological factors.—Bull. ent. Res., 37, pp. 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustan, G. G., Armstrong, T. & Putnam, W. L. (1947). The influence of air currents on the insecticidal action of DDT, benzene hexachloride, Hercules Toxicant 3956, and Velsicol 1068.—Canad. Ent., 79, pp. 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, R. W., Cole, E. L. & Buckner, A. J. (1947). Comparative residual effectiveness of organic insecticides against house flies and malaria mosquitos.—J. econ. Ent., 40, pp. 635–640.Google Scholar
Field, J. W. (1950). Fumigant and repellent effects of BHC (Gammexane) and DDT upon Anopheles.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 43, pp. 547–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaldon, A. (1949). The nation-wide campaign against malaria in Venezuela.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 43, pp. 113–160.Google Scholar
Gahan, J. B., Gilbert, I. H., Peffley, R. L. & Wilson, H. G. (1948). Comparative toxicity of four chlorinated organic compounds to mosquitos, house flies and cockroaches.—J. econ. Ent., 41, pp. 795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebert, S. (1948). Notes on certain aspects of the action of DDT residual sprays, and on the partial treatment of dwellings as a means of anti-anopheline protection.–Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 42, pp. 295–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, R. A. & Lindquist, A. W. (1949). Fumigating properties of several new insecticides.—J. econ. Ent., 42, pp. 436–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, J. S. (1947). The excitant and repellent effects on mosquitos of sub-lethal contacts with DDT.—Bull. ent. Res., 37, pp. 593–607.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. C. M. (1947). The effects of house spraying with pyrethrum and with DDT on Anopheles gambiae and A. melas in West Africa.—Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 449–464.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. C. M. (1948). Studies on Anopheles gambiae and A. melas in and around Lagos.—Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 527–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. C. M. (1950). DDT and Gammexane as residual insecticides against Anopheles gambiae in African houses.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 43, pp. 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R. H. & Reid, J. A. (1950). DDT and Gammexane as residual insecticides against Anopheles maculatus in Malaya.—Nature, 165, pp. 28–29.Google Scholar