Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T15:03:02.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of a Difference in Temperature and Humidity on certain Reactions of Female Aëdes aegypti (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Alec H. Parker
Alec H. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham*.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sir Rickard Christophers (1947) working at 25°C. and a relative humidity of 80–90 per cent. found female Aëdes aegypti to be attracted by a warm dry surface at 40°C., and to be unaffected by a moist surface at room temperature. The writer (1948), working at 28°C. and 50–70 per cent. R.H. (usually near 50 per cent.) found the opposite: a warm dry surface at temperatures from 36°C. to 40°C. had no effect, while a moist surface at room temperature exerted a quite definite attraction. The purpose of the present experiments was to test the hypothesis that the difference between the results obtained in these two investigations was due to the difference in the ambient temperature and humidity.

Repetition of the relevant experiments at 25°C, 85–90 per cent. R.H., and 28°C, 50–55 per cent. R.H., gave results indicating that temperature and humidity difference operating at the time of the experiment could account for part but not all of the discrepancy. There are indications that the remainder may have been a result of the conditioning effect of temperature and humidity differences operating on the insect prior to the experiment.

The results emphasise the need for a full description of the climatic conditions under which behaviour work of the type discussed is performed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 1952 , pp. 221 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Refernces

Brown, A. W. A. (1951). Factors in the attractiveness of bodies for mosquitoes.—Nature, Lond., 167, p. 202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christophers, S. R. (1947). Mosquito repellents, being a report of the work of the Mosquito Repellent Enquiry, Cambridge, 1943–5.—J. Hyg., Camb., 45, pp. 176–231.Google Scholar
Gutzevich, A. V. (1931). The reproduction and development of the Yellow Fever Mosquito under experimental conditions.—Mag. Parasit, Leningr., 2, pp. 35–54. [In Russian with German summary.] (Rev. appl. Ent. (B), 21, pp. 2–3).Google Scholar
Macfie, J. W. S. (1915). Observations on the bionomics of stegomyia fasciata.—Bull. ent. Res., 6, pp. 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, A. H. (1948). Stimuli involved in the attraction of Aëdes aegypti, L., to man.—Bull. ent Res., 39, pp, 397–397.Google Scholar
Seaton, D. R. & Lumsden, W. H. R. (1941). Observations on the effects of age, fertilization and light on biting by Aëdes aegypti (L.) in a controlled microclimate. — Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 35, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar