Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T20:41:42.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative toxicity of foliar and systemic applications of acetamiprid and imidacloprid against the cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A.R. Horowitz ,
Z. Mendelson ,
P.G. Weintraub  and
I. Ishaaya
A.R. Horowitz*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Agricultural Research Organization, Gilat Experiment Station, M.P. Negev, 85280, Israel
Z. Mendelson
Affiliation:
The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
P.G. Weintraub
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Agricultural Research Organization, Gilat Experiment Station, M.P. Negev, 85280, Israel
I. Ishaaya
Affiliation:
The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
*
* Fax: +972 7 992 6485 E-mail: hrami@netvision.net.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparative bioassays of two chloronicotinyl insecticides, acetamiprid and imidacloprid, against the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), using foliar and systemic applications, were conducted under laboratory conditions and in field trials. Under controlled conditions, the ovicidal activity of foliar applications of acetamiprid on cotton seedlings was much higher than that of imidacloprid. According to LC50 and LC90 values, acetamiprid was 10- and 18-fold more potent than imidacloprid. Both compounds were effective when applied to soil against whitefly adults; however, the potency of imidacloprid was somewhat higher than that of acetamiprid 2, 7 and 14 days after application; resulting (with the concentration of 25 ml a.i./l) in adult mortality of 90, 93, and 96% and 76, 84, and 76% respectively. In an experimental cotton field, the efficacy of foliar applications of 60 g a.i./ha acetamiprid and 210 g a.i./ha imidacloprid was compared. Field residual activity of acetamiprid to whitefly adults lasted for approximately ten days, compared with three days for imidacloprid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , August 1998 , pp. 437 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bai, D. & Lummis, S.C.R. & Leicht, W. & Breer, H. & Sattelle, D.B. (1991) Actions of imidacloprid and a related nitromethylene on cholinergic receptors of an identified insect motor neurone. Pesticide Science 33, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D.N. & Bellows, T.S. Jr (1991) Whitefly biology. Annual Review of Entomology 36, 431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D.N. & Bellows, T.S. & Parrella, M.P. (1990) Whiteflies in agricultural systems. pp. 227–261in Gerling, D. (Ed.) Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management. Andover, Intercept.Google Scholar
Cahill, M.R. & Byrne, F.J. & Gorman, K. & Denholm, I. & Devonshire, A.L. (1995) Pyrethroid and organophosphate resistance in the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 85, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, M.R., Jarvis, W., Gorman, K. & Denholm, I. (1996a) Resolution of baseline responses and documentation of resistance to buprofezin in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, M.R., Gorman, K., Day, S., Denholm, I., Elbert, A. & Nauen, R. (1996b) Baseline determination and detection of resistance to imidacloprid in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. (1990) Epidemiology of whitefly-transmitted viruses. pp. 211–225in Gerling, D. (Ed.) Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest status and management. Andover, Intercept.Google Scholar
Dennehy, T.J. & Williams, L. III (1997) Management of resistance in Bemsia in Arizona cotton. Pesticide Science 51, 398–406.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denholm, I., Cahill, M., Byrne, F.J. & Devonshire, A.L (1996) Progress with documenting and combating insecticide resistance in Bemisia. pp. 577–603in Gerling, D. & Mayer, R.T.. (Eds) Bemisia: 1995 taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management. Andover, Intercept.Google Scholar
Elbert, A., Overbeck, H., Iwaya, K. & Tsuboi, S. (1990) Imidacloprid, a novel systemic nitromethylene analogue insecticide for crop protection. Proceedings Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Pests and Diseases 3, 21–28.Google Scholar
Elbert, A., Nauen, R., Cahill, M., Devonshire, A.L., Scarr, A.W., Sone, S. & Steffens, R. (1996) Resistance management with chloronicotinyl insecticides using imidacloprid as an example. Pflanzenschutz-Nachricheten Bayer 49, 5–53.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A.R. (1993) Control strategy for the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, late in the cotton-growing season. Phytoparasitica 21, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, A.R. & Ishaaya, I. (1994) Managing resistance to insect growth regulators in the sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 87, 866–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, A.R. & Ishaaya, I. (1996) Chemical control of Bemisia-management and application. pp. 537–556in Gerling, D. & Mayer, R.T. (Eds) Bemisia: 1995 taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management. Andover, Intercept.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A.R., Forer, G. & Ishaaya, I. (1994) Managing resistance in Bemisia tabaci in Israel with emphasis on cotton. Pesticide Science 42, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishaaya, I. & Horowitz, A.R. (1995) Pyriproxyfen, a novel insect growth regulator for controlling whiteflies: mechanisms and resistance management. Pesticide Science 43, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeOra Software (1987) POLO-PC. A user's guide to probit or logit analysis. LeOra Software, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Liu, M.-Y. & Casida, J.E. (1993) High affinity binding of [3H]-imidacloprid in the insect acetylcholine receptor. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 46, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed-Madjar, V., Chen, M., Rosilio, D. (1984) Screening insecticides against the tobacco whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on cotton, using a leaf cage laboratory method. Phytoparasitica 12, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauen, R., Strobel, J., Tietjen, K., Otsu, Y., Erdelen, C. & Elbert, A. (1996) Aphicidal activity of imidacloprid against a tobacco feeding strain of Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae) from Japan closely related to Myzus nicotianae and highly resistant to carbamates and organophosphates. Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhaker, N., Toscano, N.C., Castle, S.J. & Henneberry, T.J. (1997) Selection for imidacloprid resistance in silverleaf whiteflies from the Imperial Valley and development of a hydroponic bioassay for resistance monitoring. Pesticide Science 51, 419–428.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, H., Mitsui, J., Takakusa, N., Matsuda, M., Yoneda, H., Suzuki, J., Ishimitsu, K. & Kishimoto, T. (1992) NI-25, a new type of systemic and broad spectrum insecticide. Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Pests and Diseases, pp. 89–96.Google Scholar
Tomizawa, M. & Yamamoto, I. (1993) Structure-activity relationships of nicotinoids and imidacloprid analogs. Journal of Pesticide Science 18, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, I. & Yabuta, G. & Tomizawa, M. & Saito, T. & Miyamoto, T. & Kagabu, S. (1995) Molecular mechanism for selective toxicity of nicotinoids and neonicotinoids. Journal of Pesticide Science 20, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar