Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T01:46:59.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Bionomics of the Bulb Mite, Rhizoglyphus echinopus, Fumouze & Robin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. E. H. Hodson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Seale-Hayne Agricultural College, Newton Abbot, Devon.

Extract

The foregoing observations and experimental work clearly indicate that the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus echinopus, is not a primary pest of the narcissus. At the same time there is every indication that the mite does bring about the destruction of bulbs originally damaged by other organisms or by mechanical means, which would normally recover from their original injuries. Further, the mites can undoubtedly carry fungus spores from bulb to bulb. It is therefore very desirable that every effort should be made to reduce the mite population in bulb-growing areas to a minimum. This can be effected by careful attention to the points enumerated under the heading of control measures.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Buckhurst, A. S.Jl. Min. Agric., xxxii, no. 8, 11 1925, pp. 734735.Google Scholar
(2)Buckhurst, A. S.Jl. Min. Agric., xxxiv, no. 1, 04 1927, pp. 46, 1 pl.Google Scholar
(3)Hodson, W. E. H.Bull. Ent. Res., xvii, pt. 4, 06 1927, p. 382.Google Scholar
(4)Michael, A. D.British Tyroglyphidae, ii, 1903, pp. 8496, pls. xxx, xxxi.Google Scholar
(5)Ogilvie, L.Rept. Dept. Agric. for 1925, Bermuda, 1926, pp. 3663.Google Scholar
(6)Welsford, E. J.Ann. App. Biol., iv, nos. 1 & 2, 11 1917, pp. 3646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Yagi, N.Berichte Ohara Inst. landwirtschftl. Forschungen, i, no. 3, 1918, pp. 349360, 8 figs., pl. i.Google Scholar