Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:56:34.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arthropod-induced mortality in immature stages of the bush fly, Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Tyndale-Biscoe ,
M. M. H. Wallace  and
R. Morton
M. Tyndale-Biscoe
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Canberra, P.O. Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
M. M. H. Wallace
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Canberra, P.O. Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
R. Morton
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Mathematics and Statistics, P.O. Box 1965, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory and field experiments were carried out in Australia to determine the effect of arthropods in cattle dung on the survival of the eggs and larvae of Musca vetustissima Wlk. They were tested in the numbers in which they came to dung pads near Canberra, during the 1978–79 and 1979–80 seasons. Laboratory tests indicated that the mite Macrocheles glaber (Müll.), the hydrophilid Cercyon sp. and the histerid Saprinus sp. were all very effective predators. The native dung beetles Onthophagus granulatus Boh. and O. australis Guér. exerted only a marginal controlling effect; and the staphylinid and aphodiine beetles were found to be largely ineffective. The control exerted by the total field fauna when brought into the laboratory was considerable when one or more of the three species of effective predators was present. In the field trials, the control of M. vetustissima was further enhanced by the adverse influence of weather.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 681 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Gawaad, A. A., Ahmed, S. M., El-Berry, A. & El-Gayer, F. H. (1976). The suppressing effect of three predators on the immature stages of the house fly Musca domestica L. on its population in a breeding site in Alexandria.—Z. angew. Ent. 80, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, R. R., Matter, J. J. & Eschle, J. L. (1973). Onthophagus gazella: effect on survival of horn flies in the laboratory.—Environ. Entomol. 2, 811–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornemissza, G. F. (1970). Insectary studies on the control of dung breeding flies by the activity of the dung beetle, Onthophagus gazella F. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae).—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 9, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drea, J. J. (1966). Studies of Aleochara tristis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), a natural enemy of the face fly.—J. econ. Ent. 59, 1368–1373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, R. D. (1977). The population dynamics of the bushfly: the elucidation of population events in the field.—Aust. J. Ecol. 2, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. & Nicholas, W. L. (1974). The spring migration of the bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walk.): evidence of displacement provided by natural population markers including parasitism.—J. Anim. Ecol. 43, 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D., Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Walker, J. (1978).—Effects of introduced dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on the breeding and abundance of the Australian bush fly, Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legner, E. F. (1978). Natural enemies imported in California for the biological control of face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer, and horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.).—Proc. Calif. Mosquito Vector Control Ass. Ann. Conf. no. 46, 77–79.Google Scholar
Macqueen, A. & Beirne, B. P. (1975). Influence of other insects on production of horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae), from cattle dung in south-central British Columbia.—Can. Ent. 107, 1255–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, R. D., Loomis, E. C. & Anderson, J. R. (1980). Influence of two species of dung beetles on larvae of face fly.—Environ. Entomol. 9, 607–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P. & Hughes, R. D. (1976). A simulation model of seasonal changes in the value of cattle dung as a food resource for an insect.—Agric. Meteorol. 17, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowball, G. J. (1944). A consideration of the insect population associated with cow dung at Crawley, Western Australia.—J. R. Soc. West. Aust. 28, 219–245.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. D. & Morgan, C. E. (1972). Field-mortality studies of the immature stages of the horn fly in Missouri.—Environ. Entomol. 1, 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyama, G. M. & Ikeda, J. K. (1976). An evaluation of fly predators at animal farms on leeward and central Oahu.—Proc. Hawaii. ent. Soc. 22. 369–379.Google Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, M., Wallace, M. M. H. & Walker, J. M. (1981). An ecological study of an Australian dung beetle, Onthophagus granulatus Boheman (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), using physiological age-grading techniques.—Bull. ent. Res. 71, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valiela, I. (1969). An experimental study of the mortality factors of larval Musca autumnalis DeGeer.—Ecol. Monogr. 39, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, M. M. H., Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Holm, E. (1979). The influence of Macrocheles glaber on the breeding of the Australian bushfly, Musca vetustissima in cow dung.— pp. 217–222in Rodriguez, J. G. (Ed.). Recent advances in acarology. Volume II.— 569 pp. New York. Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingo, C. W., Thomas, G. D., Clark, G. N. & Morgan, C. E. (1974). Succession and abundance of insects in pasture manure: relationship to face fly survival.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 67, 386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar