Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:16:12.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The analysis and standardisation of light-trap catches of Heliothis armiger (Hübner) and H. punctiger Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. Morton ,
L. D. Tuart  and
K. G. Wardhaugh
R. Morton
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Mathematics & Statistics, P.O. Box 1965, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia
L. D. Tuart
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Myall Vale, Narrabri, N.S.W. 2390, Australia
K. G. Wardhaugh
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Cotton Research Unit, P.O. Box 59, Narrabri, N.S.W. 2390, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hourly and nightly catches of Heliothis armiger (Hb.) and H. punctiger Wllgr. at a site adjacent to 2000 ha of commercial cotton in the Namoi Valley of New South Wales, were analysed in relation to various environmental factors and showed that wind speed, temperature, night-length and (H. armiger only) moonlight exerted a significant influence on trap-catch. For H. punctiger and H. armiger respectively, these factors accounted for 80 and 60% of the deviance in hourly catches but only 70 and 40% of the variation in nightly catches. Wind speeds of more than 1·7 m/s suppressed the catch of both species but had a greater effect on H. punctiger than H. armiger. Whereas with both species, the optimum temperature for trapping was about 27°C, temperature had a greater influence on the catch of H. punctiger than of H. armiger. Bright moonlight was estimated to reduce the catch of H. armiger by 49%, but no significant effect was detected for H. punctiger. The analysis revealed a number of occasions for both species in which the hourly distribution of catch and/or the change in catch between successive nights was aberrant. With H. armiger, these inconsistencies appeared to be associated with changes in population due to adult emergence, whereas for H. punctiger the most likely cause seemed to be changes due to movement. The combined effects of wind speed, temperature, night-length and moonlight were used to adjust the nightly catches of each species according to the environmental conditions prevailing on a ‘ standard’ night. This was defined as a typical summer's night with temperatures decreasing from 28·8°C at dusk to 20·6°C at dawn and ideal catching conditions, i.e. no moon and wind speed never exceeding 1·7 m/s. As such, the adjusted catches could be taken as indices of moth abundance. These showed that H. armiger had three discrete periods of abundance, characterised by the presence of large numbers of young moths and spaced at intervals suggesting successive generations. A similar pattern was lacking in H. punctiger, which was abundant only during the first half of the season. Except during periods of emergence (H.armiger), or once when spraying occured during daylight, the aerial application of insecticides to the cotton adjecent to the light-trap resulted in marked reductions in the populations of both species.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 207 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. H., Phillips, B. F. & Webb, D. J. (1976). A method for calculating moonlight illuminance at the earth's surface.—J. Appl. Ecol. 13, 741–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, E. (1976). Forecasting infestations of tropical migrant pests: the desert locust and the African armyworm.—pp. 113–134in Rainey, R.C. (Ed.). Insect flight.—287 pp. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Blair, B. W. & Catling, H. D. (1974). Outbreaks of African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta (Walker) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), in Rhodesia, South Africa, Botswana and South West Africa from February to April 1972.—Rhod. J. agric. Res. 12, 57–67.Google Scholar
Brown, E. S., Betts, E. & Rainey, R. C. (1969). Seasonal changes in distribution of the African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta (Wlk.) (Lep., Noctuidae), with special reference to Eastern Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 58, 661–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. P. (1971). Flights after sunset by the Australian phigue locust, Chortoicetes term-inifera (Walk.), and their significance in dispersal and migration.—Aust. J. Zool. 19, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, I. F. B. (1953). The Australian species of Heliothis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and their pest status.—Aust. J. Zool. 1, 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingle, H. (1972). Migration strategies of insects.—Science, N.Y. 175, 1327–1335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douthwaite, R. J. (1978). Some effects of weather and moonlight on light-trap catches of the armyworm, Spodoptera exempta (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), at Muguga, Kenya.—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 533–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrow, R. A. (1977). First captures of the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria L., at light-traps and their ecological significance.—J. Aust. ent. Soc. 16, 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, K. J. (1978). The transoceanic migration of Lepidoptera to New Zealand—a history and a hypothesis on colonisation.—N.Z. Entomol. 6, 368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyer, G. T., Wilson, A. G. L., Attia, F. I. & Clift, A. D. (1975). Insecticide resistance in Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the Namoi Valley of New South Wales, Australia.—J. Aust. ent. Soc. 14, 171–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartstack, A. W. Jr., Hollingsworth, J. P., Ridgway, R. L. & Coppedge, J. R. (1973). A population dynamics study of the bollworm and the tobacco budworm with light traps.—Environ. Entomol. 2, 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartstack, A. W., Witz, J. A. & Hollingsworth, J. P. (1978). Environmental factors affecting catch of Heliothis spp. and Trichoplusia ni in light-traps.—Tech. Pap. Amer. Soc. Agric. Eng. no. 78–3074, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. D. (1977). The Lepidoptera of Norfolk Island, their biogeography and ecology. —291 pp. The Hague, W. Junk.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1969). Migration and dispersal of insects by flight.—763 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, T. H. (1961). Queensland distributions and host records for Heliothis species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).—Qd J. agric. Sci. 18, 195–202.Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A.Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalised linear models.—Jl R. statist. Soc. A 135, 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, B. (1976). Influence of weather and nocturnal illumination on the activity and abundance of populations of Noctuids (Lepidoptera) in south coastal Queensland.— Bull. ent. Res. 66, 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roome, R. E. (1975). Activity of adult Heliothis armigera (Hb.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) with reference to the flowering of sorghum and maize in Botswana.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 523–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D. S. (1976). Insect clocks.—280 pp. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, G. W. (1976). Radar observations of insect flight.—pp. 157–197in Rainey, R. C. (Ed.). Insect flight.—287 pp. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, K. G., Room, P. M. & Greenup, L. R. (1980). The incidence of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on cotton and other host-plants in the Namoi Valley of New South Wales.—Bull. ent. Res. 70, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1974). Quasi-likelihood functions, generalised linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method.—Biometrika 61, 439–447.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. G. L. & Greenup, L. R. (1977). The relative injuriousness of insect pests of cotton in the Namoi Valley, New South Wales.—Aust. J. Ecol. 2, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1936). The influence of moonlight on the activity of certain nocturnal insects, particularly of the family Noctuidae, as indicated by a light trap.—Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 226, 357–89.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1940). An analysis of four years captures of insects in a light trap. Part II. The effect of weather conditions on insect activity; and the estimation of forecasting of changes in the insect population.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 90, 227–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1961). Studies in the effect of weather conditions on the activity and abundance of insect populations.—Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 224, 331–378.Google Scholar