No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Age matters: variations in parasitoid diversity along a successional gradient in a dry semi-deciduous tropical forest
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 August 2023
Abstract
Parasitoids are an important group of insects because their species number is among the highest. Multiple studies have addressed the relationships between forest successional age and insect diversity by focusing on herbivorous organisms, but changes in diversity of parasitoids are still poorly known. This work analyses the diversity of parasitoids in tropical forests representing three successional stages. A total of 30 traps were placed, ten in each forest successional stages. We estimated true diversity of Ichneumonidae species and guilds and explored the relationship between their diversity and the abundance of plant species using an Indicator Species Analysis; the relationship between parasitoid species and plant richness and abundance was tested using a Redundancy Analysis. A total of 1522 individuals and 168 morpho-species were captured in four months. Species richness showed no differences; however, parasitoid abundance was higher in young forest, while intermediate forest had the highest true diversity values (1D) with 71.6 effective species. According to insect guilds, richness, abundance, and diversity were similar in the three vegetation successional stages. This finding may be explained based on the intermediate disturbance hypothesis, which postulates that moderate disturbance levels favor the highest diversity. In conclusion, successional age matters, i.e., diversity is the highest in intermediate stages, while the old forests harbors guilds unique to that successional stage, such as parasitoids of melitophagous larvae of bees. Other successional stages were characterized by a single species of parasitoid, belonging to the genera Eiphosoma and Anomalon, which may indicate altered and preserved forests, respectively.
- Type
- Research Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Basset, Y, Aberlenc, HP, Barrios, H, Curletti, G, Bérenger, JM, Vesco, JP, Causse, P, Haug, R, Hennion, AS, Lesobre, L, Marqueás, F and Omeara, R (2001) Stratification and diel activity of arthropods in a lowland rainforest in Gabon. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72, 585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, ET, Seabloom, EW and Tilman, D (2012) Plant diversity controls arthropod biomass and temporal stability. Ecology Letters 15, 1457–1464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braak, CJF and Smilauer, P (2002) CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5).Google Scholar
Chan-Canché, R, Ballina-Gómez, H, Leirana-Alcocer, J, Bordera, S and González-Moreno, A (2020) Sampling of parasitoid hymenoptera: influence of the height on the ground. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 78, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, A and Shen, TJ (2010) User's Guide for Program SPADE (Species Prediction and Diversity Estimation). Taiwan: National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar
Cifuentes-Ruiz, P and Zaragoza-Caballero, S (2014) Biodiversity of Tenebrionidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, RK and Elsensohn, JE (2014) EstimateS turns 20: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, with non-parametric extrapolation. Ecography 37, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coralreefs. Science (New York, N.Y.) 199, 1302–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, D and Packer, L (1988) Effectiveness of Malaise traps in collecting Hymenoptera: the influence of trap design, mesh size, and location. The Canadian Entomologist 120, 787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rijk, M (2016) Foraging behaviour by parasitoids in multiherbivore communities (PhD thesis). Wageningen University, Wagen-ingen, NL, 218p.Google Scholar
Dufrêne, M and Legendre, P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67, 345–366.Google Scholar
Feinsinger, P (2001) Designing Field Studies for Biodiversity Conservation. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Fonseca, MB, Silva, JO, Falcão, LAD, Dupin, MGV, Melo, GA and Espírito-Santo, MM (2018) Leaf damage and functional traits along a successional gradient in Brazilian tropical dry forests. Plant Ecology 219, 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, AA, Bagley, RK, Beer, MA, Hippee, AC and Widmayer, HA (2018) Quantifying the unquantifiable: why Hymenoptera, not Coleoptera, is the most speciose animal order. BMC Ecology 18, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, SEM, Dytham, C and Mayhew, PJ (2007) Determinants of parasitoid abundance and diversity in woodland habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 352–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauld, ID (1991) The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 1. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 47, 1–589.Google Scholar
Gauld, ID (1997) The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 2. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 57, 1–485.Google Scholar
Gauld, ID (2000) The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 3. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 63, 1–453.Google Scholar
Gauld, ID, Ugalde, JA and Hanson, P (1998) Guía de los Pimplinae de Costa Rica (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Revista de Biología Tropical. International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation 46, 1–189.Google Scholar
Gauld, ID, Godoy, C, Sithole, R and Ugalde, J (2002) The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 4. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 66, 1–768.Google Scholar
Godfray, HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton, NJ, US: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Moreno, A, Bordera, S and Delfín-González, H (2015) Spatio-temporal diversity of Cryptinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) assemblages in a protected area of southeast Mexico. Journal of Insect Conservation 19, 1153–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Moreno, A, Bordera, S, Leirana-Alcocer, J, Delfín-González, H and Ballina-Gómez, HS (2018) Explaining variations in the diversity of parasitoid assemblages in a biosphere reserve of Mexico: evidence from vegetation, land management and seasonality. Bulletin of Entomological Research 108, 602–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanan, AA and Sousa, SM (2009) Diphysa yucatanensis (Papilionoideae: Leguminosae), una especie nueva de la península de Yucatán. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 80, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, BA, Shaw, MR and Askew, RR (1992) Relations among assemblage size, host specialization, and climatic variability in North American parasitoid communities. The American Naturalist 139, 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Stefanoni, JL, Dupuy, JM, Tun-Dzul, F and May-Pat, F (2010) Influence of landscape structure and stand age on species density and biomass of a tropical dry forest across spatial scales. Landscape Ecology 26, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Stefanoni, J, Dupuy, JM, Johnson, KD, Birdsey, R, Tun-Dzul, F, Peduzzi, A, Caamal-Sosa, JP, Sánchez-Santos, G and López-Merlí, D (2014) Remote sensing improving species diversity and biomass estimates of tropical dry forests using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sensing 6, 4741–4763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, MO (1979) DECORANA a Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averanging. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Kasparyan, DR and Ruíz-Cancino, E (2005) Avispas parasíticas de plagas y otros insectos. Cryptini de México (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Cryptinae) Parte I. Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, México: UAT.Google Scholar
Kasparyan, DR and Ruíz-Cancino, E (2008) Cryptini de México (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Cryptinae) Parte II. Serie Avispas parasíticas de plagas y otros insectos. Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, México: UAT.Google Scholar
Koricheva, J, Mulder, CPH, Schmid, B, Joshi, J and Huss-Danell, K (2000) Numerical responses of different trophic groups of invertebrates to manipulations of plant diversity in grasslands. Oecologia 125, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaSalle, J and Gauld, ID (1993) Hymenoptera: Their Biodiversity, and Their Impact on the Diversity of Other Organisms. Wallingford, UK: CAB international.Google Scholar
Leal, CRO, Oliveira Silva, J, Sousa-Souto, L and de Siqueira Neves, F (2016) Vegetation structure determines insect herbivore diversity in seasonally dry tropical forests. Journal of Insect Conservation 20, 979–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, P and Legendre, L (1998) Numerical Ecology, Second English edition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Li, L, Aguilar, R and Berkov, A (2017) What shapes cerambycid beetle communities in a tropical forest mosaic? Assessing the effects of host tree identity, forest structure, and vertical stratification. Biotropica 49, 675–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohbeck, M, Poorter, L, Paz, H, Pla, L, van Breugel, M, Martínez-Ramos, M and Bongers, F (2012) Functional diversity changes during tropical forest succession. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 14, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, JT (1994) How to measure arthropod diversity in a tropical rainforest. Biology International 28, 3–13.Google Scholar
Mazón, M and Bordera, S (2008) Effectiveness of two sampling methods used for collecting Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) in the Cabañeros National Park (Spain). European Journal of Entomology 105, 879–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazón, M and Bordera, S (2014) Diversity of ichneumonidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) in a protected area of central Spain: what are we protecting? Insect Conservation and Diversity 7, 432–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B and Mefford, MJ (2016) PC-ORD: Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data [v7]. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software.Google Scholar
Moreno, CE, Barragán, F, Pineda, E and Pavón, NP (2011) Reanálisis de la diversidad alfa: alternativas para interpretar y comparar información sobre comunidades ecológicas. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82, 1249–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, FS, Silva, JO, Espírito-Santo, MM and Fernandes, GW (2014) Insect herbivores and leaf damage along successional and vertical gradients in a tropical dry forest. Biotropica 46, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyafwono, M, Valtonen, A, Nyeko, P and Roininen, H (2014) Butterfly community composition across a successional gradient in a human-disturbed afro-tropical rain forest. Biotropica 46, 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, PW, Bouton, CE, Gross, P, McPheron, BA, Thompson, JN and Weis, AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D (2015) The Braconid and Ichneumonid Parasitoid Wasps, Biology, Systematics, Evolution and Ecology. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rocha-Ortega, M, Arnan, X, Ribeiro-Neto, JD, Leal, IR, Favila, ME and Martínez-Ramos, M (2018) Taxonomic and functional ant diversity along a secondary successional gradient in a tropical forest. Biotropica 50, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubene, D, Schroeder, M and Ranius, T (2015) Diversity patterns of wild bees and wasps in managed boreal forests: effects of spatial structure, local habitat and surrounding landscape. Biological Conservation 184, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, EP (1989) Enemies hypothesis: a review of the effect of vegetational diversity on predatory insects and parasitoids. Environmental Entomology 18, 590–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sääksjärvi, IE, Haataja, S, Neuvonen, S, Gauld, ID, Jussila, R, Salo, J and Burgos, AM (2004) High local species richness of parasitic wasps (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae; Pimplinae and Rhyssinae) from the lowland rainforests of Peruvian Amazonia. Ecological Entomology 29, 735–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sääksjärvi, IE, Ruokolainen, K, Tuomisto, H, Haataja, S, Fine, PVA, Cárdenas, G, Mesones, I and Vargas, V (2006) Comparing composition and diversity of parasitoid wasps and plants in an Amazonian rain-forest mosaic. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Reyes, UJ, Niño-Maldonado, S, Clark, SM, Barrientos-Lozano, L and Almaguer-Sierra, P (2019) Successional and seasonal changes of leaf beetles and their indicator value in a fragmented low thorn forest of northeastern Mexico (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). ZooKeys 825, 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, TE and Ward, DF (2018) Variation in the diversity and richness of parasitoid wasps based on sampling effort. PeerJ 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Scherber, C, Eisenhauer, N, Weisser, WW, Schmid, B, Voigt, W, Fischer, M, Schulze, ED, Roscher, C, Weigelt, A, Allan, E, Beler, H, Bonkowski, M, Buchmann, N, Buscot, F, Clement, LW, Ebeling, A, Engels, C, Halle, S, Kertscher, I, … Tscharntke, T (2010) Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468, 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, MJ (2007) Phylogeny and classification of hymenoptera. Zootaxa 1668, 521–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, MR and Hochberg, ME (2001) The neglect of parasitic hymenoptera in insect conservation strategies: the British fauna as a prime example. Journal of Insect Conservation 5, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, W (1986) Response by specialist and generalist natural enemies to agroecosystem diversification: a selective review. Environmental Entomology 15, 456–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, JO, Espírito-Santo, MM and Melo, GA (2012) Herbivory on Handroanthus ochraceus (Bignoniaceae) along a successional gradient in a tropical dry forest. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 6, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skillen, EL, Pickering, J and Sharkey, MJ (2000) Species richness of the Campopleginae and Ichneumoninae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) along a latitudinal gradient in Eastern North American old-growth forests. Environmental Entomology 29, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, SR, Veloso, MDM, Espírito-Santo, MM, Silva, JO, Sánchez-Azofeifa, A, Souza e Brito, BG and Fernandes, GW (2019) Litterfall dynamics along a successional gradient in a Brazilian tropical dry forest. Forest Ecosystems 6, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenbacka, F, Hjältén, J, Hilszczański, J, Ball, JP, Gibb, H, Johansson, T, Pettersson, RB and Danell, K (2010) Saproxylic parasitoid (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonoidea) communities in managed boreal forest landscapes. Insect Conservation and Diversity 3, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stork, NE, Coddington, JA, Colwell, RK, Chazdon, RL, Dick, CW, Peres, CA, Sloan, S and Willis, K (2009) Vulnerability and resilience of tropical forest species to land-use change. Conservation Biology 23, 1438–1447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taki, H, Kevan, PG and Ascher, JS (2007) Landscape effects of forest loss in a pollination system. Landscape Ecology 22, 1575–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taki, H, Okochi, I, Okabe, K, Inoue, T, Goto, H, Matsumura, T and Makino, I (2013) Succession influences wild bees in a temperate forest landscape: the value of early successional stages in naturally regenerated and planted forests. PLoS One 8, e56678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teodoro, AV, Muñoz, A, Tscharntke, T, Klein, AM and Tylianakis, JM (2011) Early succession arthropod community changes on experimental passion fruit plant patches along a land-use gradient in Ecuador. Agriculture. Ecosystems & Environment 140, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Braak, CJ and Prentice, IC (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18, 271–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The jamovi project (2022) jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.Google Scholar
Townes, H (1969) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 1. Memoirs of the American entomological Institute 11, 1–300.Google Scholar
Townes, H (1970a) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 2. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 11, 1–300.Google Scholar
Townes, H (1970b) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 3. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 13, 1–307.Google Scholar
Townes, H (1971) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 4. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 17, 1–372.Google Scholar
Townes, H and Townes, M (1962) Ichneumon-Flies of America North of Mexico: 3. Subfamily Gelinae, Tribe Mesostenini. United States National Museum Bulletin 216. Part 3. Washington, D.C: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Valtonen, A, Malinga, GM, Nyafwono, M, Nyeko, P, Owiny, A and Roininen, H (2017) The successional pathway of the tree community and how it shapes the fruit-feeding butterfly community in an Afrotropical forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 33, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäschke, N, Hardge, K, Hancock, C, Hilker, M, Obermaier, E and Meiners, T (2014) Habitats as complex odour environments: how does plant diversity affect herbivore and parasitoid orientation? PLoS One 9, e85152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winfree, R, Griswold, T and Kremen, C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conservation Biology 21, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, DS, van Achterberg, K and Horstmann, K (2016) World Ichneumonoidea 2015. Taxonomy, biology, morphology and distribution. Taxapad 2016. Catalogue Database on flash drive.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y and Adams, J (2011) Top-down control of herbivores varies with ecosystem types. Journal of Ecology 99, 370–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, Y, Sang, W, Bai, F and Axmacher, JC (2013) Relationships between plant diversity and the abundance and a-diversity of predatory ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a mature Asian temperate forest ecosystem. PLoS One 8, e82792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Moreno et al. supplementary material 1
File
18.9 KB
González-Moreno et al. supplementary material 2
File
120.7 KB
González-Moreno et al. supplementary material 3
File
102.9 KB