Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:24:01.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The identification of blood-meals from Culicine mosquitos from Northern Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. W. Service
M. W. Service
Affiliation:
Malaria Unit, Ministry of Health, Kaduna, Northern Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Precipitin tests were performed on 238 blood-smears made from Culicine mosquitos collected from natural resting places at three sites, in the area surrounding a village, in uninhabited forest, and at an uninhabited rock outcrop in savannah vegetation in Northern Nigeria. In calculating the percentages of blood-meals that were positive for the various animals, the following criteria were applied: all negative results were subtracted from the totals tested; in calculating mammalian, but not avian or reptilian, percentages, all records that referred to “mammal, weak smear” were subtracted; “unidentified mammal” was included in the calculations. Results showed that Culex pipiens fatigans Wied. (taken only in the area surrounding the village) had fed mainly on man (45%) and birds (36%), and while Aedes vittatus (Big.) (taken only at the rock outcrop) fed to some extent on both man (14%) and birds (18%), the majority of blood-meals (54%) had been obtained from the porcupine (Histrix cristata). It is thought that these feeds on man from individuals of Ae. vittatus taken at an uninhabited site may have been obtained from villagers using a road about 150 yd. from the outcrop. Ae. luteocephalus (Newst.) (the majority of which were taken in forest) also fed to some extent on porcupine (11%) and birds (16%), but the principal host appeared to be Bovids (74%). It was established for the first time that Uranotaenia mashonaensis Theo. (the majority of which were taken in forest) bites man (29%); mammals other than man and birds accounted for 29 and 24 per cent., respectively. Half of the blood-smear samples obtained from females of this species did not react to any antisera, and were classified as negative.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , May 1965 , pp. 637 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davis, G. E. & Philip, C. B. (1931). The identification of the blood-meal in West African mosquitoes by means of the precipitin test. A preliminary report.—Amer. J. Hyg. 14 pp. 130–141.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1962). Rep. E. Afr. Virus Res. Inst. no. 12, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J. & Dick, G. W. A. (1948). Catches of biting Diptera in Uganda, with anaesthetised monkeys as bait.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 42 pp. 271–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddow, A. J., Van Someren, E. C. C., Lumsden, W. H. R., Harper, J. O. & Gillett, J. D. (1951). The mosquitoes of Bwamba County, Uganda. VIII. Records of occurrence, behaviour and habitat.–Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. —Ssenkubuge, Y. (1963). Studies on the biting habits of East African mosquitos in the genera Uranotaenia, Ficalbia and Hodgesia.— Bull. ent. Res. 53 pp. 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammon, W. M., Reeves, W. C. & Galindo, P. (1945). Epidemiologic studies of encephalitis in the San Joaquin valley of California, 1943, with the isolation of viruses from mosquitoes.—Amer. J. Hyg. 42 pp. 299–306.Google Scholar
Keay, R. W. J. (1953). An outline of Nigerian vegetation.—2nd edn., 55 pp. Lagos, Govt. Printer.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. J. (1943). Mosquitoes in relation to yellow fever in the Nuba Mountains, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 37 pp. 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, P. F. & others (1951). The Culex pipiens complex.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 102 pp. 331–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magoon, E. H. (1935). A portable stable trap for capturing mosquitos.—Bull, ent. Res. 26 pp. 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. & Page, W. (1953). The ecology of Glossina palpalis in Northern Nigeria.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 104 pp. 71–169.Google Scholar
Philip, C. B. (1929). Preliminary report of further tests with yellow fever transmission by mosquitoes other than Aedes aegypti.—Amer. J. trop. Med. 9 pp. 267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remington, C. L. (1945). The feeding habits of Uranotaenia lowii Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae).—.Ent. News 56 pp. 32–37, 64–68.Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (1962). Mosquito records from Northern Nigeria.—Ent. mon. Mag. 98 no. 1173 pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (1963). The ecology of the mosquitos of the northern Guinea savannah of Nigeria.—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 601–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1964). The attraction of mosquitoes by animal baits in the northern Guinea savannah of Nigeria.—J. ent. Soc. S. Afr. 27 pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (1965). The ecology of the tree-hole breeding mosquitoes in the Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria.—J. appl. Ecol. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1955). On the transmission of bancroftial filariasis on Ukara Island, Tanganyika. IV.—Host-preferences of mosquitos and the incrimination of Anopheles gambiae Giles and A. funestus Giles as vectors of bancroftial filariasis.—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A., Knight, K. L. & Starcke, H. (1959). A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, Culicidae).—358 pp. Washington, D.C., Ent. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
Weitz, B. (1956). Identification of blood meals of blood-sucking arthropods.— Bull. World Hlth Org. 15 pp. 473–490.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, M. C., Weitz, B. & Mcclelland, G. A. H. (1958). Natural hosts of some species of Taeniorhynchus Lynch Arribalzaga (Diptera, Culicidae) collected in Uganda, as determined by the precipitin test.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 52 pp. 186–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed