Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:57:49.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The utilization of fish by-products and waste in animal feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

I. H. Pike
Affiliation:
International Association of Fish Meal Manufacturers, Hoval House, Mutton Lane, Potters Bar, Herts
I. N. Tatterson
Affiliation:
Tony Research Station, Humber Laboratory, Wassand Street, Hull, Humberside
Get access

Extract

Most of the by-products from fish go into the production of fish meal and fish oil, the latter going directly to the human food chain, and therefore do not really come under the heading of industrial by-products and waste per se. Broadly speaking, fish meal made from fish offal is a by-product which otherwise would have been wasted. This paper discusses the quantities involved and the nutritional properties offish meal, and in addition, the contribution to fish meal and fish oil made from species which are not suitable for human consumption (e.g. sandeels) or where the quantities caught exceed the demand for human consumption (e.g. sprats).

Any method of utilizing fish by-products for animal feeding should minimize chemical changes in the product to avoid reduction in the nutrients which are present at the time of catching. In some respects chemical changes in fish by-products are brought about in a similar way to those in grass, cut for preservation. The fish material has a high water content, around 75%, and from the time of catching is subject to chemical changes by enzymes in the fish and also by bacterial action. Fish, however, differs from grass in that it contains oil and virtually no carbohydrates. The demersal, or lean fish, for example, cod, haddock, plaice, saithe, etc., contain high levels of oil in the liver which are removed for separate processing, but little in the flesh and in the offal produced. The ‘industrial’ fish caught are mainly pelagic species with high levels of oil in the flesh.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Luscombe, J. 1973. Feeding fish silage. Pig Farming 21: 6163.Google Scholar
Petersen, H. 1973. Acid preservation of fish and fish offal. Fisheries Bulletin, FAO, Rome 6: 12.Google Scholar
Pike, I. H. 1975. The role of fish meal in diets for poultry. Tech. Bull. No. 3. International Association of Fish Meal Manufacturers, Hoval House, Mutton Lane, Potters Bar, Herts, EN6 3AR.Google Scholar
Pike, I. H. 1976. Formulation of poultry diets for maximum profit: requirements for protein. Feedstuffs 25: 32.Google Scholar
Pike, I. H. 1978a. The role of fish meal in diets for pigs. Tech. Bull. No. 6. International Association of Fish Meal Manufacturers, Hoval House, Mutton Lane, Potters Bar, Herts, EN6 3AR.Google Scholar
Pike, I. H. 1978b. Unidentified growth factors in fish meal: possible nutritional explanations. Proc. XVI World's Poultry Congress, Brazil. 1936-1949. World Poultry Sci. Assoc., Rue Aurora, 291-1° andar, Sao Paulo, CEP 01209, Brazil.Google Scholar
Smith, P. and Adamson, A. H. 1976. Feeding trials with white fish and herring liquid protein (fish silage). Proc. Torry Res. Stn. symposium on fish silage. Torry Res. Stn., 135 Abbey Rd., Aberdeen, AB9 8DG.Google Scholar
Tatterson, I. N. 1976. The preparation and storage of fish silage. Proc. Torry Res. Stn. symposium on fish silage. Torry Res. Stn. 135 Abbey Rd., Aberdeen, AB9 8DG.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Taylor, A. G. 1976. Nutritive value to the growing pig of de-oiled liquefied herring offal preserved with formic acid (fish silage). J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 27: 239243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wignall, J. and Tatterson, I. N. 1976. Fish silage. Process Biochemistry 11: 17.Google Scholar