Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T00:02:50.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of straw and cellulosic wastes and methods of improving their value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J. F. D. Greenhalgh*
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen
Get access

Extract

The most widely-quoted estimates of straw supplies and usage in England and Wales are those of a working party of the National Farmers Union (1973). They assumed the yield of straw to be 2.8 t/ha, and hence 9.3 Mt from 3.4 M ha of cereals in 1972. (The same yield from 3.7 M ha of cereals in the UK would give 10.4 Mt.) Of the 9.3 Mt, 37% was estimated to be burned in the field or ploughed in, 36% used for bedding, 15% used for feed, and 12% used for other purposes. The figure of 2.4 t/ha (1 t/acre) may well be too low. Short (1974) found straw yields at four Experimental Husbandry Farms over several years to be as follows (t/ha): winter wheat 3.71, spring wheat 4.68, spring barley 2.71, and spring oats 4.54. Wood (1974) surveyed wheat crops in Oxfordshire in 1973 and found yields of 3.7 t/ha. The total quantity of straw available is therefore likely to be considerably in excess of 9.3 Mt and could if necessary be increased further by cutting at a lower level. The accuracy of the National Farmers Union estimate of 0.15 × 10.4 = 1.6 Mt used for animal feeding is also questionable, but this amount would — if it contained 6.5 MJ metabolizable energy (ME)/kg dry matter (DM) — be sufficient to provide only about 7% of the maintenance requirements of all cattle in Britain. On a larger scale, Balch (1977) has calculated that if all the straw grown in Europe were improved by chemical treatment it could provide 80 to 90% of the maintenance requirements of Europe's ruminant livestock. World estimates for the production of straw and other fibrous wastes are given by Owen (1976).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Balch, C.C. 1977. The potential of poor-quality agricultural roughages for animal feeding. In New Feed Resources. Proceedings of a Technical Consultation, Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome.Google Scholar
Beckmann, E. 1921. Conversion of grain straw and lupins into feeds of high nutrient value. Festschr. Kaiser Wilhelm Ges. Ford. Wiss. Zehnjahrigen Jubilaum, pp. 1826.Google Scholar
Burt, A. W.A. 1966. Nutritive value of ground and pelleted barley straw. I. Ground and pelleted versus long straw for growing Ayrshire heifers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 131137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donefer, E., Adeleye, I.O.A. and Jones, T.A.O.C. 1969. Effect of urea supplementation on the nutritive value of NaOH-treated oat straw. In Celluloses and their Application (ed. Gould, R.F.). Advances in Chemistry No. 95. American Chemical Society, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W.S. 1943. The digestibility of straw pulp. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 33: 174177.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Carmona, J. and Greenhalgh, J.F.D. 1972. The digestibility and acceptability to sheep of chopped or milled barley straw soaked or sprayed with alkali. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78: 477485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J.F.D. and Pirie, R. 1979. Alkali treatment of barley straw, hay, dried grass, bean straw and whole-crop oats. Anim. Prod. 28:431 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J.F.D., Pirie, R., Shin, H.T. and Stewart, C.S. 1978. Alkali treatment of straw for ruminants. 2. Nutritive value of straw ensiled after alkali treatment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 3: 289.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. 1968. The use of nitrogen in the management of pasture for cattle. Herb. Abstr. 38: 265277.Google Scholar
Homb, T. 1948. Feeding experiments with alkali-treated straw. Meld. Norg Landr Høgsk. 28: 277365.Google Scholar
Innes, G.M. and Kay, M. 1978. Supplementation of barley straw for castrated male cattle (steers). Anim. Prod. 26: 399400.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.G. 1977. The alkali treatment of straws. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2: 105130.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.G. 1979. Treating straw for animal feeding. FOA Animal Production and Health Papers. No. 10.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, M.C.N., and Owen, E. 1975. Sodium hydroxide treatment of straw: effect of volume and concentration of solution on digestibility and intake by sheep. Anim. Prod. 21: 313322.Google Scholar
Kellner, O. 1926. (The Scientific Feeding of Farm Animals) (translated by Goodwin, W.) 2nd ed. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Klinner, W.E. and Chaplin, R.V. 1977. Developments in straw densification. Straw Utilization Conference, Oxford. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Kristensen, V.F. et al 1978. Sodium hydroxide-treated straw as feed for Cattle and sheep. Beretn. Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, No. 464.Google Scholar
Leach, G. 1976. Energy and Food Production. IPC Business Press, Guildford, UK.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1977. Straw Utilization Conference, Oxford. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
National Farmers Union. 1973. The use and disposal of straw. Min. Rep. NFU, London.Google Scholar
Ololade, B.G. and Mowat, D.N. 1975. Influence of whole plant barley reconstituted with sodium hydroxide on digestibility, rumen fluid and plasma metabolism of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 351357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E.R. and Greenhalgh, J.F.D. 1977. Alkali treatment as a method of processing whole grain for cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 89: 253255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, E. 1976. Farm wastes: straw and other fibrous materials. In Food Production and Consumption, the Efficiency of Human Food Chains and Nutrient cycles, (ed. Duckham, A.N., Jones, J.G. W. and Foberts, E. H.). North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Palmer, F.G. 1976. The feeding value of straw to ruminants. ADASq. Rev. 21: 220234.Google Scholar
Petchey, A.M. and Mbatya, P. 1977. The intake of steers and heifers fed on mixtures of alkali-treated or untreated straw with grass silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2: 315326.Google Scholar
Pirie, R. and Greenhalgh, J.F.D. 1978. Alkali treatment of straw for ruminants. 1. Utilization of complete diets containing straw by beef cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 3: 143154.Google Scholar
Raine, H.D. 1978. On-farm treatment of cereal straws with sodium hydroxide — effect of alkali level, post treatment neutralization and concentrate supplementation upon nutritive value for sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Short, J.L. 1974. Straw disposal trials at the experimental husbandry farms. Exptl. Husb. NQ. 25: 103.Google Scholar
Sundstøl, F., Coxworth, E. and Mowat, D.N. 1978. Improving the nutritive value of straw and other low-quality roughages by treatment with ammonia. Wld. Anim. Rev. 26: 1321.Google Scholar
Swan, H. and Clarke, V.J. 1974. The use of processed straw in rations for ruminants. Proc. Univ. Nottingham Nutr. Conf Feed. Manufrs. 8: 205233.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J.M. and Gonzalez Santillana, R. 1978. Ensiled alkali-treated straw. 1. Effect of level and type of alkali on the consumption and digestibility in vitro of ensiled barley straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 3: 117132.Google Scholar
Wood, R.S. 1974. Straw production and disposal in Oxfordshire. ADAS Straw Utilization Conference, Oxford. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar