Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T06:24:59.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of molecular genetic techniques: a case study on the Iberian pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

M.A. Toro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
E. Alves
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
C. Barragán
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
C. Castellanos
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
E. Fabuel
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
A. Fernández
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
C. Ovilo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
M.C. Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
L. Silió
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera A Coruña km. 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The usefulness of molecular genetic markers as a tool for the conservation, characterisation and differentiation of domestic animal populations are shown in the following text, that summarises diverse applications to Iberian pigs.

Type
Section 4: Conservation in action
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, E., Ovilo, C., Rodríguez, M.C. and Silió, L. 2002a. Mitochondrial D-loop and Cytochrome B gene sequences as a tool to preserve the genetic diversity in an Iberian pig population. International Conference on Animal Genetics, August 2002, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Alves, E., Castellanos, C., Ovilo, C., Silió, L. and Rodríguez, M.C. 2002b. Differentiation of the raw material of the Iberian pig meat industry based on the use of amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Meat Science 61: 157162.Google Scholar
Alves, E., Ovilo, C., Rodríguez, M.C. and Silió, L. 2003. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and phylogenetic relationships among Iberian pigs and other domestic and wild pig populations. Animal Genetics 34: 319324.Google Scholar
Barker, J.S.F. 1999. Conservation of livestock breed diversity. Animal Genetic Resources Information 25: 3343.Google Scholar
Blott, S.C., Williams, J.L. and Haley, C.S. 1999. Discriminating among cattle breeds using genetic markers. Heredity 82: 613619.Google Scholar
Caballero, A. and Toro, M.A. 2000. Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations. Genetical Research 75: 331343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eding, H., Meuwissen, T.H.E. 2001. Marker based estimates of between and within population kinship for the conservation of genetic diversity. Journal Animal Breeding Genetics 118: 141159.Google Scholar
Fabuel, E., Barragán, L., Silió, L., Rodríguez, M.C. and Toro, M.A. 2004. Analysis of genetic diversity and conservation priorities in Iberian pigs based on microsatellite markers. Heredity (in press).Google Scholar
Fernández, A., Óvilo, C., Castellanos, C., Rodríguez, M.C., Toro, M.A. and Silió, L. 2002. Identification of a new haplotype for the MC1R gene in Iberian pig. International Conference on Animal Genetics, August 2002, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gandini, G. and Oldenbroek, J.K. 1999. Choosing the conservation strategy. In: Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal genetic resource. Edited by Oldenbroek, J.K., DLO Institute for Animal Sciences and Health. The Netherlands. pp. 7590.Google Scholar
Giuffra, E., Kijas, J.M.H., Armager, V., Carlborg, O., Jeon, J.T. and Anderson, L. 2000. The origin of the domestic pig: Independent domestication and subsequent introgression. Genetics 154: 17851791.Google Scholar
Kim, K.I., Lee, J.H., Li, K., Zhang, Y.P., S.S., , Gongora, J. and Moran, C. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Asian and European pig breeds determined by mitochondrial D-loop sequence polymorphism. Animal Genetics 33: 1925.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. and Ritland, K. 1999. Estimation of the pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152: 17531766.Google Scholar
MacHugh, D.E. and Bradley, D.G. 2001. Livestock genetic origins: goats buck the trend. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences USA. 98: 53825384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malécot, G. 1948. The Mathematiques de l’Heredité. Masson et Cie, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Ollivier, L. and Foulley, J-L. 2002. Some suggestions on how to preserve both within and between genetic diversity. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
Rodrigañez, J., Toro, M.A. Rodriguez, C. and Silió, L. 2000. Alleles survival from Portuguese and Spanish strains in a population of Iberian pig. In: Tradition and innovation in Mediterranean pig production, Edited by Afonso, J.A. and Tirapicos, J.L., CIHEAMUE, Zaragoza, Spain. pp. 5761.Google Scholar
Silió, L. 2000. Iberian pig breeding programme. In: Developing breeding strategies for lower input animal production environments. Edited by Galal, S., Boyazoglou, J. and Hammond, H., International Committee for Animal Recording, Roma, Italy. pp. 511520.Google Scholar
Toro, M.A. and Maki-Tanila, A. 1999. Establishing a conservation scheme. In: Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal genetic resource. Edited by Oldenbroek, J.K., DLO Institute for Animal Sciences and Health. The Netherlands. pp. 7590.Google Scholar
Toro, M.A., Silió, L., Rodrigáñez, J., Rodríguez, M.C. and Fernández, J. 1999. Optimal use of genetic markers in conservation programes. Genetics Selection Evolution 31: 255261.Google Scholar
Toro, M.A., Rodrigañez, J., Silió, L. and Rodriguez, C. 2000. Genealogical analysis of a closed herd of black hairless Iberian pigs. Conservation Biology 14: 18431851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toro, M.A., Barragán, C., Ovilo, C., Rodrigáñez, J., Rodríguez, M.C. and Silió, L. 2002a. Estimation of coancestry in Iberian pigs using molecular markers. Conservation Genetics 3: 309320.Google Scholar
Toro, M.A., Barragán, C., Ovilo, C., Rodríguez, M.C. and Silió, L. 2002b. Estimation of coancestry from genetic markers in a population with complex pedigree. Proceedings 7th Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 33: 485488.Google Scholar
Ursing, B.M. and Arnason, U. 1998. The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the pig. Journal of Molecular Evolution 47: 302306.Google Scholar
Thaon d’Arnoldi, C., Foulley, J-L. and Ollivier, L. 1998. An overview of the Weitzman approach to diversity. Genetics Selection Evolution 30: 149161.Google Scholar
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M., and Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 44074414.Google Scholar
Wang, J. 1997. More efficient breeding systems for controlling inbreeding and effective size in animal populations. Heredity 79: 591599.Google Scholar
Wang, J. 2002. Optimal marker-assisted selection to increase the effective size in small populations. Genetics 157: 867874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M.L. 1992. On diversity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 363405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar