Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T05:56:05.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current and future developments in dairy cattle breeding: a research viewpoint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT
S. Brotherstone
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT
P. M. Visscher
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

Rates of genetic improvement in dairy cattle breeding programmes have increased substantially in the last decade, not only in Europe where there has been substantial immigration of North American stock. More accurate statistical evaluation procedures, including the use of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) with the animal model, have been introduced; higher selection intensities have been achieved, particularly on production traits, through better organized and focused schemes; and developments in multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) have been both a stimulus and to some extent a cause. Continued rapid improvement can be expected as research and development enables more accurate and timely use to be made of recording data, because there is evidence that heritability values for milk production are rising, perhaps because of better cow management, and as competition among breeders internationally increases. There are a number of consequent challenges to geneticists and breeders. Attention will have to be given to maintaining the fitness of very high producing animals by recording health, fertility, longevity and parlour traits, and using the results of research to give them appropriate weight in selection decisions. Developments in molecular methods and in reproductive technologies present new opportunities, but are unlikely to do more for some time than complement progress from conventional selection on the important production traits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banos, G. 1994. International genetic evaluation of dairy cattle. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol. 17, pp. 310.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. 1993. Sires of daughters. Holstein Friesian Journal 75: 462.Google Scholar
Georges, M., Nielsen, D., Mackinnon, M., Mishra, A., Okimoto, R., Pasquino, A. T., Sargeant, L. S., Sorensen, A., Steele, M. S., Zhao, X., Womack, J. E. and Hoeschele, I. 1994. Using a complete microsatellite map and the granddaughter design to locate polygenes controlling milk production. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol. 21, pp. 8185.Google Scholar
Lugt, A. W. van der, , Janss, L. L. G. and Arendonk, J. A. M. van, . 1994. Estimation of variance components in large animal models using Gibbs sampling. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol. 18, pp. 329332.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. T., Freeman, A. E. and Kuck, A. L. 1991. Genetics of health traits in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 10921100.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E. 1991. Expectation and variance of genetic gain in open and closed nucleus and progeny testing schemes. Animal Production 53: 133141.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E. and Arendonk, J. A. M. van, . 1992. Potential improvements in rate of genetic gain from marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes. Journal of Dairy Science 75:16511659.Google Scholar
Oltenacu, P. A., Frick, A. and Lindhe, B. 1991. Relationship of fertility to milk yield in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 265268.Google Scholar
Reents, R., Dekkers, J. C. M. and Schaeffer, L. R. 1994. Genetic parameters of test day somatic cell counts and production traits. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol. 17, pp. 120123.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. and Rendel, J. M. 1950. The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle. Journal of Genetics 50: 2131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, G., Mrode, R., Winters, M., Stevens, G., Graham, N. and Leboff, S. 1994. Summary statistics for genetic evaluations (Dairy). Animal Data Centre Limited.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Brotherstone, S., Stott, A. W., Hill, W. G. and Simm, G. 1994. Combining transmitting abilities for yield and linear type in an index for selection on production and longevity. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol. 17, pp. 6972.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1995. Genotype by environment interactions — experience from Langhill. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow. British Society of Animal Science, occasional publication, no. 19, pp. 5966.Google Scholar
Wiggans, G. R. and VanRaden, P. M. 1991. Method and effect of adjustment for heterogeneous variance. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 43504357.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A., Angus, K. A. and Wilson, S. B. 1993. Endogenous pulsing and stimulated release of growth hormone in dairy calves of high and low genetic merit. Animal Production 56:18.Google Scholar