Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T04:39:39.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyses of the moisture content of hoof horn from horses, donkeys and laminitic donkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

L Hopegood ,
S N Collins ,
R J Latham  and
J D Reilly
L Hopegood
Affiliation:
The Nottingham Trent University, School of Land-based Studies, Brackenhurst, Southwell, Notts, NG25 OQF, UK. Email: lyn.hopegood@ntu.ac.uk
S N Collins
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, Email: rjlatham@dmu.ac.uk, Email: scollins@dmu.ac.uk
R J Latham
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, Email: rjlatham@dmu.ac.uk, Email: scollins@dmu.ac.uk
J D Reilly
Affiliation:
Royal Army Veterinary Corps, Defence Animal Centre, Melton Mowbray, LE13 OSP
Get access

Extract

The moisture content of keratinous materials such as hoof horn is important as the presence of moisture has an inverse relationship on the mechanical properties of hoof horn and may have a subsequent effect on the function of the hoof. Methods previously used to dehydrate samples to calculate the moisture content of hoof horn vary considerably (Hopegood, 2002). Subsequent comparison of results is therefore unreliable. A comparison of different methods of dehydrating hoof horn was therefore carried out to establish a standardised protocol for dehydrating hoof horn to assess its moisture content. The moisture content of donkey hoof horn from normal animals and those with laminitis has not been reported. Maclean (1971) established that the moisture content of cattle suffering from laminitis was significantly higher than normal hooves. The resultant standardised protocol from the first part of this study was then used to compare the moisture content of hoof horn samples taken from horses, donkeys and those donkeys that had suffered from laminitis.

Type
Posters
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 32: Emerging Equine Science , 2004 , pp. 169 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hopegood, L. (2002). Tubule Density, Moisture Content and Mechanical Properties of Donkey Hoof Horn. PhD Thesis, De Montfort University.Google Scholar
Maclean, C.W. (1971). The long term effects of laminitis in dairy cows. Veterinary Record . 89: 34–37. Google Scholar