Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T21:58:19.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4.3 Integration with Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J. B. Kilkenny*
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission P. O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley
Get access

Extract

Three obvious statements but well worth repeating: “Computers are only an aid to summarizing information for use in assisting management decisions”; “Records are only of any use if they are used — they are not an end in themselves”; and “No point having sophisticated computerized management aids if the basic information is not available and if only decisions at a simple level are to be made”.

Amongst dairy and pig producers, the need for keeping records is well established and probably over 40% of all dairy cows and pigs in Britain are involved in an enterprise recording scheme. By contrast, all too few beef and sheep producers currently keep any detailed computerized records in an organized way. It is estimated that only about 2% of all commercial beef and sheep are involved in an enterprise recording scheme. Good basic records are an essential ingredient to any more sophisticated management aid because these need to be based on relevant reliable data for individual situations. The need to use computers and their value on the individual farm is dependent upon having sufficient information to make it worthwhile employing them. The sophistication of management aids required for enterprises will be determined by the level of recording already involved. It is obvious that the requirements for beef and sheep producers are at a much more basic level than for many pig and dairy producers.

Type
4. Policies for Future Use of Computers in Animal Production
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avis, P. R. D., Pollott, G. E. and Landon, A. P. 1981. The use of an enterprise simulation program fo predict the physical and financial performance of a pig herd. Computers in animal production. Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. No. 5.Google Scholar
Bailie, J. H. and Drury, N. S. 1977. The use of computer simulation in the application of oestrus synchronization and artificial insemination in the beef herd. Anim. Prod. 24: 153 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Craven, J. A. and Warren, M. E. 1980. Economic interpretation of management information derived from milk records. EAAP Meeting, Munich, 1980.Google Scholar
MLC. 1980. Pig Improvement Service Newsletter No. 14 — Sow productivity.Google Scholar
Glover, H. 1981. A model of 18-month grass/cereal beef. Computers in animal production. Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. No. 5.Google Scholar
Pattison, H. D., Cook, G. L. and Mackenzie, S. 1980. A study of natural service farrowing rates and associated fertility parameters. Anim, Prod. 30: 452 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Richardson, H. 1977. A beef rationing model. BSAP Summer meeting, 1977. Management and economic decisions in animal production. Sutton Bonington.Google Scholar
Spedding, A. W. and Pollott, G. E. 1981. The programmable calculator as an aid to the recording and planning of beef enterprises. Computers in animal production. Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. No. 5.Google Scholar